An Intervention to Reduce Occupational Health Risk from Antibiotic Resistant Pathogens Among Dairy Farm Workers.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olivia Chao, John Shutske, Elsie Gonzalez, Danielle Veeser, Emily Diaz Vallejo, Ajay Sethi, Tony Goldberg, Ashley Kates, Mary Jo Knobloch, Juliana Leite de Campos, Pamela Ruegg, Nasia Safdar, Andrew Steinberger, Garret Suen, Amanda Young
{"title":"An Intervention to Reduce Occupational Health Risk from Antibiotic Resistant Pathogens Among Dairy Farm Workers.","authors":"Olivia Chao, John Shutske, Elsie Gonzalez, Danielle Veeser, Emily Diaz Vallejo, Ajay Sethi, Tony Goldberg, Ashley Kates, Mary Jo Knobloch, Juliana Leite de Campos, Pamela Ruegg, Nasia Safdar, Andrew Steinberger, Garret Suen, Amanda Young","doi":"10.13031/jash.16158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This intervention utilized the Health Belief Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to address the knowledge and social barriers that increase dairy farm workers' risk to antimicrobial-resistant infections. Dairy farm workers gained a significant increase in knowledge of the 8 desired outcomes, related to occupational health skills that reduce risks, from our intervention. Limited time was a major barrier as to why dairy farm workers felt like they could not make behavioral changes that would reduce their occupational health risk. Dairy farmworkers showed a strong likelihood of making workplace health-related behavioral changes, but their intention to change was weaker in areas of personal antibiotic stewardship.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study focused on developing and evaluating an educational intervention designed to mitigate occupational health risks associated with pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria among dairy farm workers. Data collected from farms and workers as part of a larger umbrella project that focused on dairy farm antibiotic use for cows and calves were used to inform elements of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior, leading to eight intervention outcomes. The intervention targeted increased knowledge and promoted behavioral changes related to worker and workplace hygiene best practices, PPE use, biosecurity, and personal antibiotic stewardship. Educational materials included instructional videos, fact sheets in English and Spanish, and supplementary printed material, including illustrated take-home points, content summaries, and posters. The intervention was conducted with 32 workers from five dairy farms, using pre- and post-intervention assessments to measure knowledge gains and behavioral intentions. Results demonstrated statistically significant increases in knowledge across all targeted outcomes (p-value ≤ .001), with most participants showing a high willingness and likelihood to implement recommended behaviors related to their workplace exposures and best practices. However, participants indicated a greater reluctance to change around issues of personal antibiotic stewardship. Time constraints were the most significant and most consistent barrier to behavior change. The study highlights the importance of ongoing research and refinement of intervention strategies to address barriers and enhance protective practices among often underserved farmworkers in agriculture. These intervention strategies contribute to improved occupational health outcomes with benefits to public health by reducing the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections to the broader population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"31 1","pages":"31-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.16158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: This intervention utilized the Health Belief Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to address the knowledge and social barriers that increase dairy farm workers' risk to antimicrobial-resistant infections. Dairy farm workers gained a significant increase in knowledge of the 8 desired outcomes, related to occupational health skills that reduce risks, from our intervention. Limited time was a major barrier as to why dairy farm workers felt like they could not make behavioral changes that would reduce their occupational health risk. Dairy farmworkers showed a strong likelihood of making workplace health-related behavioral changes, but their intention to change was weaker in areas of personal antibiotic stewardship.

Abstract: This study focused on developing and evaluating an educational intervention designed to mitigate occupational health risks associated with pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria among dairy farm workers. Data collected from farms and workers as part of a larger umbrella project that focused on dairy farm antibiotic use for cows and calves were used to inform elements of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior, leading to eight intervention outcomes. The intervention targeted increased knowledge and promoted behavioral changes related to worker and workplace hygiene best practices, PPE use, biosecurity, and personal antibiotic stewardship. Educational materials included instructional videos, fact sheets in English and Spanish, and supplementary printed material, including illustrated take-home points, content summaries, and posters. The intervention was conducted with 32 workers from five dairy farms, using pre- and post-intervention assessments to measure knowledge gains and behavioral intentions. Results demonstrated statistically significant increases in knowledge across all targeted outcomes (p-value ≤ .001), with most participants showing a high willingness and likelihood to implement recommended behaviors related to their workplace exposures and best practices. However, participants indicated a greater reluctance to change around issues of personal antibiotic stewardship. Time constraints were the most significant and most consistent barrier to behavior change. The study highlights the importance of ongoing research and refinement of intervention strategies to address barriers and enhance protective practices among often underserved farmworkers in agriculture. These intervention strategies contribute to improved occupational health outcomes with benefits to public health by reducing the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections to the broader population.

降低奶牛场工人抗生素耐药病原体职业健康风险的干预措施
重点:本干预措施利用健康信念模型和计划行为理论来解决知识和社会障碍,增加了奶牛场工人抗菌素耐药性感染的风险。从我们的干预中,奶牛场工人获得了8个期望结果的知识显著增加,这些结果与降低风险的职业健康技能有关。有限的时间是奶牛场工人感到他们无法做出行为改变以降低职业健康风险的主要障碍。奶牛场工人很有可能做出与工作场所健康相关的行为改变,但他们在个人抗生素管理方面的改变意愿较弱。摘要:本研究旨在制定和评估一项旨在减轻奶牛场工人与病原体和耐药细菌相关的职业健康风险的教育干预措施。从农场和工人那里收集的数据是一个更大的伞形项目的一部分,该项目主要关注奶牛和小牛对奶牛场抗生素的使用,这些数据被用来为健康信念模型和计划行为理论的要素提供信息,导致了八种干预结果。干预措施的目标是增加与工人和工作场所卫生最佳做法、个人防护装备使用、生物安全和个人抗生素管理相关的知识并促进行为改变。教育材料包括教学录像、英语和西班牙语实况介绍,以及补充印刷材料,包括图文并举的要点、内容摘要和海报。干预是对来自五个奶牛场的32名工人进行的,使用干预前和干预后的评估来衡量知识收获和行为意图。结果显示,在所有目标结果中,知识都有统计学上的显著增加(p值≤0.001),大多数参与者表现出高度的意愿和可能性,实施与其工作场所暴露和最佳实践相关的推荐行为。然而,参与者表示更不愿意改变个人抗生素管理问题。时间限制是行为改变的最重要和最持久的障碍。该研究强调了正在进行的研究和改进干预战略的重要性,以消除农业中往往得不到充分服务的农场工人的障碍并加强保护措施。这些干预策略有助于改善职业健康结果,通过减少抗生素耐药感染在更广泛人群中的传播,有利于公共卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信