Development of a questionnaire investigating the physical and psychological well-being and need for rehabilitative strategies in patients with pulmonary embolism.

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Caroline Sindet-Pedersen, Jenny Bjerre, Nina Nouhravesh, Mohamad El-Chouli, Simone Hofman Rosenkranz, Morten Lamberts, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Anette Arbjerg Højen, Morten Schou, Gunnar Gislason, Nina Føns Johnsen
{"title":"Development of a questionnaire investigating the physical and psychological well-being and need for rehabilitative strategies in patients with pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Caroline Sindet-Pedersen, Jenny Bjerre, Nina Nouhravesh, Mohamad El-Chouli, Simone Hofman Rosenkranz, Morten Lamberts, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Anette Arbjerg Højen, Morten Schou, Gunnar Gislason, Nina Føns Johnsen","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00933-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quantitative questionnaires can provide a deeper understanding of the health-related physical and psychological well-being in patients who have experienced a pulmonary embolism (PE). This paper describes the development of a questionnaire aiming to assess physical and psychological well-being and the need for rehabilitative strategies among patients diagnosed with PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The International Society for Quality-of-Life Research (ISO-QOL) recommendations for patient-reported outcomes were used. Conceptualization was conducted through literature review and expert interviews, followed by operationalization where items (questions) were constructed. To test content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by experts and a series of cognitive interviews were performed. Finally, the questionnaire was distributed digitally to 82 randomly selected patients with PE in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire reached a response rate of 72%. The median age of responders was 71.5 years [inter quartile range: 64.2; 77.0], with 51.9% being female. Most patients did not feel safe about being discharged, with only 9.3% responding that they felt safe to some or a high degree. Approximately 15% were offered physical therapy, 7.9% were offered educational activities addressing psychological reactions, and 3.9% received psychological support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The questionnaire showed good content validity and a high response rate. The results from the questionnaire have the potential to increase focus and awareness of the potential clinical and social impact of PE. It will facilitate optimized medical interventions and guide physicians in providing appropriate follow-up care for patients with PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00933-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Quantitative questionnaires can provide a deeper understanding of the health-related physical and psychological well-being in patients who have experienced a pulmonary embolism (PE). This paper describes the development of a questionnaire aiming to assess physical and psychological well-being and the need for rehabilitative strategies among patients diagnosed with PE.

Methods: The International Society for Quality-of-Life Research (ISO-QOL) recommendations for patient-reported outcomes were used. Conceptualization was conducted through literature review and expert interviews, followed by operationalization where items (questions) were constructed. To test content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by experts and a series of cognitive interviews were performed. Finally, the questionnaire was distributed digitally to 82 randomly selected patients with PE in Denmark.

Results: The questionnaire reached a response rate of 72%. The median age of responders was 71.5 years [inter quartile range: 64.2; 77.0], with 51.9% being female. Most patients did not feel safe about being discharged, with only 9.3% responding that they felt safe to some or a high degree. Approximately 15% were offered physical therapy, 7.9% were offered educational activities addressing psychological reactions, and 3.9% received psychological support.

Conclusion: The questionnaire showed good content validity and a high response rate. The results from the questionnaire have the potential to increase focus and awareness of the potential clinical and social impact of PE. It will facilitate optimized medical interventions and guide physicians in providing appropriate follow-up care for patients with PE.

制定一份调查肺栓塞患者生理和心理健康状况以及康复策略需求的问卷。
目的:定量问卷可以更深入地了解肺栓塞(PE)患者与健康相关的生理和心理健康状况。本文描述了一份问卷的开发,旨在评估PE患者的身心健康状况和康复策略的需求。方法:采用国际生活质量研究协会(ISO-QOL)推荐的患者报告结果。概念化是通过文献回顾和专家访谈进行的,然后是构建项目(问题)的操作化。为了检验内容效度,问卷由专家审核,并进行一系列认知访谈。最后,问卷以数字方式分发给丹麦82名随机选择的PE患者。结果:问卷回复率达72%。应答者的中位年龄为71.5岁[四分位数间距:64.2;77.0],其中51.9%为女性。大多数患者对出院感到不安全,只有9.3%的人回答说他们有一定或高度的安全感。约15%的人接受物理治疗,7.9%的人接受针对心理反应的教育活动,3.9%的人接受心理支持。结论:该问卷具有较好的内容效度和较高的回复率。问卷调查的结果有可能增加人们对体育运动潜在临床和社会影响的关注和认识。这将有助于优化医疗干预措施,并指导医生为PE患者提供适当的随访护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信