Enablers and barriers to coalface primary care reform in England: a qualitative study.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0065
Claire Jackson Am, Caroline Nicholson, Jenny Job, Jon Sussex, Stephen Morris
{"title":"Enablers and barriers to coalface primary care reform in England: a qualitative study.","authors":"Claire Jackson Am, Caroline Nicholson, Jenny Job, Jon Sussex, Stephen Morris","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the Declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978 (1) global health policy has prioritised primary and integrated care reform to better manage chronic illness, improve health access, and prevent disease.(2) Yet internationally primary care, like the health systems it struggles to support, is currently far from strengthened; and is increasingly challenged by chronic underfunding, lack of recognition, and a diminishing and demoralised workforce.(3,4) AIM: To better understand the policy barriers responsible for the current status from the perspective of general practice in England DESIGN & SETTING: Key Informant Interviews with 12 general practice policy or practice leaders identified from publicly-available position statements, publications or innovative programs in UK primary care reform over the past decade METHOD: A qualitative deductive approach using thematic analysis to analyse informant data to understand historical barriers and explore enablers for future reform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in eight main themes. 1. Dynamics of power and autonomy 2. Under-investment in primary care 3. Aligning policy and implementation 4. Navigating complexity and change 5. Building trust through relationships and leadership 6. The revolving door of policy and leadership 7. Valuing the workforce: A key to morale and retention 8. Strategic communication and media engagement CONCLUSION: Better-targeted funding reform, more effective systems integration building on general practice and community service strengths, and better valuing the complex role of the primary care sector as central to a high-functioning health system, were seen as key to the future. Participants also called for more effective policy input from those skilled in the delivery of care, and the capacity for earned autonomy and flexibility to deliver care relevant to individual community need. Action to address these opportunities is pressing, as finalisation of the 10 Year Health Plan and more-immediate NHS restructure rapidly gathers momentum.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the Declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978 (1) global health policy has prioritised primary and integrated care reform to better manage chronic illness, improve health access, and prevent disease.(2) Yet internationally primary care, like the health systems it struggles to support, is currently far from strengthened; and is increasingly challenged by chronic underfunding, lack of recognition, and a diminishing and demoralised workforce.(3,4) AIM: To better understand the policy barriers responsible for the current status from the perspective of general practice in England DESIGN & SETTING: Key Informant Interviews with 12 general practice policy or practice leaders identified from publicly-available position statements, publications or innovative programs in UK primary care reform over the past decade METHOD: A qualitative deductive approach using thematic analysis to analyse informant data to understand historical barriers and explore enablers for future reform.

Results: The analysis resulted in eight main themes. 1. Dynamics of power and autonomy 2. Under-investment in primary care 3. Aligning policy and implementation 4. Navigating complexity and change 5. Building trust through relationships and leadership 6. The revolving door of policy and leadership 7. Valuing the workforce: A key to morale and retention 8. Strategic communication and media engagement CONCLUSION: Better-targeted funding reform, more effective systems integration building on general practice and community service strengths, and better valuing the complex role of the primary care sector as central to a high-functioning health system, were seen as key to the future. Participants also called for more effective policy input from those skilled in the delivery of care, and the capacity for earned autonomy and flexibility to deliver care relevant to individual community need. Action to address these opportunities is pressing, as finalisation of the 10 Year Health Plan and more-immediate NHS restructure rapidly gathers momentum.

英国煤工作面初级保健改革的推动因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
背景:自1978年《阿拉木图宣言》(1)以来,全球卫生政策已将初级保健和综合保健改革放在优先位置,以更好地管理慢性病、改善卫生获取和预防疾病。(2)然而,国际初级保健与其努力支持的卫生系统一样,目前远未得到加强;并且日益受到长期资金不足,缺乏认可以及劳动力减少和士气低落的挑战。(3,4)目的:从英格兰全科实践的角度更好地了解造成当前状况的政策障碍。对12位全科医生政策或实践领导者的访谈,这些领导者是从过去十年英国初级保健改革的公开立场声明、出版物或创新项目中确定的。方法:采用定性演绎法,使用主题分析来分析信息数据,以了解历史障碍并探索未来改革的推动因素。结果:分析得出八个主要主题。1. 权力与自治的动态初级保健投资不足。政策与实施的一致性。驾驭复杂性和变化通过人际关系和领导力建立信任。政策和领导的旋转门。重视员工:鼓舞士气和留住员工的关键。结论:更有针对性的筹资改革、基于全科医疗和社区服务优势的更有效的系统整合、以及更好地重视初级保健部门作为高功能卫生系统核心的复杂作用,被视为未来的关键。与会者还呼吁从提供护理的熟练人员那里获得更有效的政策投入,以及获得自主和灵活性的能力,以提供与个别社区需要相关的护理。随着《10年卫生计划》的最后定稿和更为紧迫的国民保健制度重组迅速形成势头,解决这些机会的行动迫在眉睫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信