Rethinking digital and AI inclusion: participatory and intersectionality-informed methods for disability and migrant justice.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1593330
Karen Soldatic, Mikyung Lee, Eunice Tunggal, Ashley Liao, Liam Magee
{"title":"Rethinking digital and AI inclusion: participatory and intersectionality-informed methods for disability and migrant justice.","authors":"Karen Soldatic, Mikyung Lee, Eunice Tunggal, Ashley Liao, Liam Magee","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1593330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Everyday consumer technologies are increasingly integral to autonomy, mobility, and social participation among people with disabilities and migrants from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds. However, these technologies often remain inaccessible and exclusionary at the intersection of these identities. This study examined how CaLD migrants with disabilities engage with everyday consumer technologies using participatory and intersectionality-informed approaches. This article focuses on Stage Two of the Autonomy, Diversity & Disability: Everyday Practices of Technology project, funded by the Australian Research Council industry partnership grant (LP: 190900099), which involved individual interviews, creative workshops, guided discussions, post-workshop reflections, and the co-creation of AI-generated e-books. Drawing on three case studies, the analysis identified three key findings: (1) participants experienced a disproportionate burden in navigating digital accessibility and advocating for their needs; (2) generative AI perpetuated biases and misrepresentations of intersecting identities; and (3) participants actively used everyday consumer technologies to foster agency, learning, caregiving, and cultural connection. Through sustained participatory engagement, the researchers identified methodological parameters to inform future disability-inclusive, participatory, and intersectionality-informed research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1593330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1593330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Everyday consumer technologies are increasingly integral to autonomy, mobility, and social participation among people with disabilities and migrants from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds. However, these technologies often remain inaccessible and exclusionary at the intersection of these identities. This study examined how CaLD migrants with disabilities engage with everyday consumer technologies using participatory and intersectionality-informed approaches. This article focuses on Stage Two of the Autonomy, Diversity & Disability: Everyday Practices of Technology project, funded by the Australian Research Council industry partnership grant (LP: 190900099), which involved individual interviews, creative workshops, guided discussions, post-workshop reflections, and the co-creation of AI-generated e-books. Drawing on three case studies, the analysis identified three key findings: (1) participants experienced a disproportionate burden in navigating digital accessibility and advocating for their needs; (2) generative AI perpetuated biases and misrepresentations of intersecting identities; and (3) participants actively used everyday consumer technologies to foster agency, learning, caregiving, and cultural connection. Through sustained participatory engagement, the researchers identified methodological parameters to inform future disability-inclusive, participatory, and intersectionality-informed research.

重新思考数字和人工智能包容:残疾人和移民司法的参与性和交叉性方法。
日常消费技术对残疾人和来自不同文化和语言背景的移民的自主性、流动性和社会参与日益不可或缺。然而,在这些身份的交叉点,这些技术往往仍然是不可访问的和排他性的。本研究考察了残疾CaLD移民如何使用参与性和交叉性知情方法参与日常消费技术。本文重点介绍由澳大利亚研究理事会行业合作基金(LP: 190900099)资助的“自主、多样性和残疾:技术的日常实践”项目的第二阶段,该项目涉及个人访谈、创意研讨会、指导讨论、研讨会后反思以及人工智能生成电子书的共同创作。根据三个案例研究,该分析确定了三个主要发现:(1)参与者在导航数字无障碍和倡导他们的需求方面经历了不成比例的负担;(2)生成式人工智能使交叉身份的偏见和虚假陈述永久化;(3)参与者积极使用日常消费技术来促进代理、学习、照顾和文化联系。通过持续的参与性参与,研究人员确定了方法参数,为未来的残疾包容性、参与性和交叉性研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信