Mixed-Methods Investigation of Rural Emergency Medical Services ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Time to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: High- vs Low-Performing Agencies.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michael Supples, McKenna E Gallagher, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Ashley E Strahley, Chadwick D Miller, Simon A Mahler, Jason P Stopyra
{"title":"Mixed-Methods Investigation of Rural Emergency Medical Services ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Time to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: High- vs Low-Performing Agencies.","authors":"Michael Supples, McKenna E Gallagher, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Ashley E Strahley, Chadwick D Miller, Simon A Mahler, Jason P Stopyra","doi":"10.5811/westjem.43536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cared for by rural emergency medical services (EMS) agencies commonly do not have first medical contact-to-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) time within the recommended goal of 90 minutes. In this study we identify factors associated with performance variation among rural EMS agencies in first medical contact-to-PCI time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods study, we ranked eight rural county EMS agencies by continuous first medical contact-to-PCI time, accounting for loaded mileage, using data from a regional STEMI registry (2016-2019). A qualitative researcher conducted 28, one-hour, semi-structured interviews from January- March 2021 with the EMS director, training officer, medical director, and four paramedics at the top two high- and bottom two low-performing rural EMS agencies. Key informants were blinded to agency STEMI performance. Interviews were structured to identify positive deviance by exploring agencies' clinical approach to patients with chest pain, their organizational culture, structure, and quality improvement (QI) activities regarding STEMI care, and recommendations for improving STEMI performance. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. We established a codebook and performed a thematic analysis using an inductive approach. We summarized and compared data across agencies to identify commonalities and differences between high- and low-performing agencies. Findings were reviewed and validated by an expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top two highest-performing EMS agencies had a median first medical contact-to-PCI time of 79 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 65-91) minutes vs 98 minutes (IQR 82-120) among the bottom two lowest-performing agencies, P<.001. Both high- and low-performing agencies identified issues with electrocardiogram (ECG) transmitting technology and cumbersome hospital activation communications. However, top-performing agencies shared a culture that encourages early EMS activation of the cardiac catheterization lab after STEMI recognition. Top-performing agencies also placed a higher value on QI and training. These agencies prioritized mission and chain of command over staff relationships/interpersonal bonds; have stable, strong leadership; provide opportunities for career advancement; and collaborate with community leaders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Top-performing rural EMS agencies for STEMI care promote early activation, have a strong chain of command, are mission focused, and have a greater focus on quality improvement and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"924-935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.43536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cared for by rural emergency medical services (EMS) agencies commonly do not have first medical contact-to-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) time within the recommended goal of 90 minutes. In this study we identify factors associated with performance variation among rural EMS agencies in first medical contact-to-PCI time.

Methods: In this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods study, we ranked eight rural county EMS agencies by continuous first medical contact-to-PCI time, accounting for loaded mileage, using data from a regional STEMI registry (2016-2019). A qualitative researcher conducted 28, one-hour, semi-structured interviews from January- March 2021 with the EMS director, training officer, medical director, and four paramedics at the top two high- and bottom two low-performing rural EMS agencies. Key informants were blinded to agency STEMI performance. Interviews were structured to identify positive deviance by exploring agencies' clinical approach to patients with chest pain, their organizational culture, structure, and quality improvement (QI) activities regarding STEMI care, and recommendations for improving STEMI performance. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. We established a codebook and performed a thematic analysis using an inductive approach. We summarized and compared data across agencies to identify commonalities and differences between high- and low-performing agencies. Findings were reviewed and validated by an expert panel.

Results: The top two highest-performing EMS agencies had a median first medical contact-to-PCI time of 79 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 65-91) minutes vs 98 minutes (IQR 82-120) among the bottom two lowest-performing agencies, P<.001. Both high- and low-performing agencies identified issues with electrocardiogram (ECG) transmitting technology and cumbersome hospital activation communications. However, top-performing agencies shared a culture that encourages early EMS activation of the cardiac catheterization lab after STEMI recognition. Top-performing agencies also placed a higher value on QI and training. These agencies prioritized mission and chain of command over staff relationships/interpersonal bonds; have stable, strong leadership; provide opportunities for career advancement; and collaborate with community leaders.

Conclusion: Top-performing rural EMS agencies for STEMI care promote early activation, have a strong chain of command, are mission focused, and have a greater focus on quality improvement and training.

农村急诊医疗服务st段抬高心肌梗死至经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的混合方法调查:高绩效机构与低绩效机构。
背景:经农村紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构治疗的st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,首次接触经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时间通常不超过推荐的90分钟目标。在本研究中,我们确定了与农村EMS机构在首次医疗接触到pci时间的绩效差异相关的因素。方法:在这项解释性、顺序性、混合方法研究中,我们使用区域STEMI登记处(2016-2019)的数据,根据连续首次医疗接触到pci的时间(考虑负载里程)对8个农村县EMS机构进行排名。从2021年1月至3月,一名定性研究人员与EMS主任、培训官、医疗主任和4名护理人员进行了28次1小时的半结构化访谈,访谈对象分别来自绩效最高的两家和绩效最低的两家农村EMS机构。关键线人对机构的STEMI表现不知情。访谈的结构是通过探讨机构对胸痛患者的临床方法,他们的组织文化、结构和关于STEMI护理的质量改进(QI)活动,以及改善STEMI绩效的建议,来确定积极的偏差。采访被数字记录下来,并由专业的转录服务逐字转录。我们建立了一个密码本,并使用归纳方法进行了主题分析。我们总结和比较了各机构的数据,以确定高绩效和低绩效机构之间的共性和差异。专家组对调查结果进行了审查和验证。结果:表现最好的两家EMS机构的首次医疗接触至pci时间中位数为79分钟(四分位差[IQR] 65-91),而表现最差的两家EMS机构的首次医疗接触至pci时间中位数为98分钟(IQR 82-120)。结论:表现最好的农村EMS机构在STEMI护理中促进早期激活,具有强大的指挥链,以任务为中心,更注重质量改进和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信