Impact of Medical Student Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Tertiary Center Analysis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryan Ballard, Asfia Qureshi, Chengu Niu, Keith Grams, Mathew Devine, Nagesh Jadhav, Richard Alweis
{"title":"Impact of Medical Student Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Tertiary Center Analysis.","authors":"Ryan Ballard, Asfia Qureshi, Chengu Niu, Keith Grams, Mathew Devine, Nagesh Jadhav, Richard Alweis","doi":"10.5811/westjem.42229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing patient use of emergency departments (ED) and overcapacity threaten both efficiency of the care provided and the teaching mission. We investigated the influence of medical student (MS) involvement on ED throughput, resource use, and clinical outcomes, and we addressed gaps in existing literature that primarily focus on resident physicians and singular throughput metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of 123,503 encounters with patients >21 years of age at an urban, tertiary-care hospital, comparing cases with and without MS participation. We excluded patients seen by advanced practice practitioners. We compared continuous variables using t-tests with bootstrap, and categorical variables by chi-square tests. Continuous variables were reported with mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed patient encounters both with and without MS coverage across various complexity levels from January 1, 2022-December 31, 2023. Of the 123,503 patient encounters, 9,635 (7.8%) involved MS participation, and 113,868 (92.2%) did not. Across all encounters, door-to-physician time showed no significant difference between encounters with (28.1 minutes ± 38.6) and without medical students (28.4 minutes ± 38.0; P = .435), while door-to-triage and arrival-to-disposition time (292.6 minutes ± 193.7 vs 270.4 minutes ± 532.8; P < .001) and doctor-to-disposition time (266.8 minutes ± 186.1 vs. 242.9 minutes ± 376.4; P < .001) were significantly longer. In high-complexity encounters, patients seen with medical students experienced shorter door-to-physician (26.6 vs 28.2 minutes, P < .001), door-to-triage (13.6 vs 14.5 minutes, P = .03), arrival-to-disposition (301.1 vs 307.7 minutes, P = .02), and doctor-to-disposition times (275.2 vs 281.3 minutes, P =.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that medical student involvement is associated with longer patient stays in low- to medium-complexity cases but improved efficiency in the management of high-complexity cases. Increased rates of some diagnostic imaging and higher admission rates occurred with medical students. Our single-center design highlights the need for multicenter validation of these findings to inform future resource allocation and educational strategies in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"773-780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.42229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing patient use of emergency departments (ED) and overcapacity threaten both efficiency of the care provided and the teaching mission. We investigated the influence of medical student (MS) involvement on ED throughput, resource use, and clinical outcomes, and we addressed gaps in existing literature that primarily focus on resident physicians and singular throughput metrics.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of 123,503 encounters with patients >21 years of age at an urban, tertiary-care hospital, comparing cases with and without MS participation. We excluded patients seen by advanced practice practitioners. We compared continuous variables using t-tests with bootstrap, and categorical variables by chi-square tests. Continuous variables were reported with mean and standard deviation.

Results: We analyzed patient encounters both with and without MS coverage across various complexity levels from January 1, 2022-December 31, 2023. Of the 123,503 patient encounters, 9,635 (7.8%) involved MS participation, and 113,868 (92.2%) did not. Across all encounters, door-to-physician time showed no significant difference between encounters with (28.1 minutes ± 38.6) and without medical students (28.4 minutes ± 38.0; P = .435), while door-to-triage and arrival-to-disposition time (292.6 minutes ± 193.7 vs 270.4 minutes ± 532.8; P < .001) and doctor-to-disposition time (266.8 minutes ± 186.1 vs. 242.9 minutes ± 376.4; P < .001) were significantly longer. In high-complexity encounters, patients seen with medical students experienced shorter door-to-physician (26.6 vs 28.2 minutes, P < .001), door-to-triage (13.6 vs 14.5 minutes, P = .03), arrival-to-disposition (301.1 vs 307.7 minutes, P = .02), and doctor-to-disposition times (275.2 vs 281.3 minutes, P =.02).

Conclusion: We found that medical student involvement is associated with longer patient stays in low- to medium-complexity cases but improved efficiency in the management of high-complexity cases. Increased rates of some diagnostic imaging and higher admission rates occurred with medical students. Our single-center design highlights the need for multicenter validation of these findings to inform future resource allocation and educational strategies in the ED.

医学生参与对急诊科结果的影响:一项第三中心分析。
导读:急诊科(ED)患者使用的增加和产能过剩威胁着提供护理的效率和教学任务。我们调查了医学生(MS)参与对急诊科吞吐量、资源使用和临床结果的影响,并解决了现有文献中主要关注住院医生和单一吞吐量指标的空白。方法:我们对一家城市三级医院123,503例年龄在21岁至21岁之间的患者进行了回顾性观察分析,比较了有和没有MS参与的病例。我们排除了由高级执业医师看过的患者。我们用t检验和自举法比较连续变量,用卡方检验比较分类变量。连续变量用均值和标准差报告。结果:我们分析了2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间不同复杂程度的MS覆盖和非MS覆盖患者。在123,503例患者中,9,635例(7.8%)患者参与MS, 113,868例(92.2%)患者未参与MS。在所有接触中,从门到医生的时间在有医学生(28.1分钟±38.6分钟)和没有医学生(28.4分钟±38.0分钟;P = .435),而门到分诊和到达到处置时间(292.6分钟±193.7 vs 270.4分钟±532.8;P < 0.001)和医生到处置时间(266.8分钟±186.1∶242.9分钟±376.4;P < 0.001)。在高复杂性就诊中,医学生就诊的患者从门口到医生(26.6 vs 28.2分钟,P < .001)、从门口到分诊(13.6 vs 14.5分钟,P =. 03)、从到达到处置(301.1 vs 307.7分钟,P =.02)和从医生到处置(275.2 vs 281.3分钟,P =.02)的时间更短。结论:我们发现医学生参与与中低复杂性病例的住院时间延长有关,但在高复杂性病例的管理中提高了效率。医学生的某些诊断显像率和录取率均有所增加。我们的单中心设计强调了对这些发现进行多中心验证的必要性,以便为ED未来的资源分配和教育策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信