Biological Variation of Corrected QT and QRS Electrocardiogram Intervals: Interpreting Results of Drug-induced Prolongation.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alan Wu, Kayla Kendric, Caitlin Roake, Emily Kelly
{"title":"Biological Variation of Corrected QT and QRS Electrocardiogram Intervals: Interpreting Results of Drug-induced Prolongation.","authors":"Alan Wu, Kayla Kendric, Caitlin Roake, Emily Kelly","doi":"10.5811/westjem.33602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Toxicologists use a universal threshold to determine QRS and QTc prolongation in poisoned patients. Further understanding of the biologic variance of these intervals may allow for a more personalized approach to assessing the clinical significance of electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited six male and six female healthy subjects. Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed in duplicate once per week for four consecutive weeks. We calculated the mean and standard deviation, the coefficient of variance (CV) for replicate readings (CV<sub>A</sub>), and within (CV<sub>I</sub>) and between individuals (CV<sub>G</sub>) using analysis of variance for all subjects and separately for males and females. From these measured parameters, we determined the index of individuality (II), the reference change value (RCV), and number of readings needed to maintain a homeostatic setpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median QRS interval for healthy males (103.4 milliseconds [ms]) was statistically higher than that for females (88.6 ms) in our study (P < .05). The CV<sub>A</sub> and CV<sub>I</sub> for the QRS interval for the total cohort were relatively low at 3.0 and 2.2, respectively. The CV<sub>G</sub> for the QRS interval was relatively high at 12.9. There was no difference in the QTcorrected (QTc) interval between gender (404 vs 415 msec, respectively). The II was 0.29 for QRS and 0.74 for QTc in pooled subjects. The RCV was 10.3 and 7.1 msec, respectively, for QRS and QTc for all subjects. The number of samples needed to establish a homeostatic set point was 1 for all analyses at a closeness of 10% with a 95% probability (P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated a significant difference in QRS duration between healthy males and females as well as a low II, particularly for the QRS interval, indicating that the CV<sub>G</sub> is greater than the CV<sub>I</sub> among these ECG intervals. In this study we also determined that one ECG is needed to establish a homeostatic set point for patients. If a baseline ECG is available, medical toxicologists would benefit from using the baseline tracing as an internal reference for determining QRS and QTc prolongation in the individual patient rather than a predetermined universal threshold for managing poisoned patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"978-983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.33602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Toxicologists use a universal threshold to determine QRS and QTc prolongation in poisoned patients. Further understanding of the biologic variance of these intervals may allow for a more personalized approach to assessing the clinical significance of electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in these patients.

Methods: We recruited six male and six female healthy subjects. Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed in duplicate once per week for four consecutive weeks. We calculated the mean and standard deviation, the coefficient of variance (CV) for replicate readings (CVA), and within (CVI) and between individuals (CVG) using analysis of variance for all subjects and separately for males and females. From these measured parameters, we determined the index of individuality (II), the reference change value (RCV), and number of readings needed to maintain a homeostatic setpoint.

Results: The median QRS interval for healthy males (103.4 milliseconds [ms]) was statistically higher than that for females (88.6 ms) in our study (P < .05). The CVA and CVI for the QRS interval for the total cohort were relatively low at 3.0 and 2.2, respectively. The CVG for the QRS interval was relatively high at 12.9. There was no difference in the QTcorrected (QTc) interval between gender (404 vs 415 msec, respectively). The II was 0.29 for QRS and 0.74 for QTc in pooled subjects. The RCV was 10.3 and 7.1 msec, respectively, for QRS and QTc for all subjects. The number of samples needed to establish a homeostatic set point was 1 for all analyses at a closeness of 10% with a 95% probability (P = .05).

Conclusion: We demonstrated a significant difference in QRS duration between healthy males and females as well as a low II, particularly for the QRS interval, indicating that the CVG is greater than the CVI among these ECG intervals. In this study we also determined that one ECG is needed to establish a homeostatic set point for patients. If a baseline ECG is available, medical toxicologists would benefit from using the baseline tracing as an internal reference for determining QRS and QTc prolongation in the individual patient rather than a predetermined universal threshold for managing poisoned patients.

校正QT间期和QRS心电图间期的生物学变异:解释药物引起的延长结果。
毒理学家使用一个通用的阈值来确定中毒患者的QRS和QTc延长。进一步了解这些时间间隔的生物学差异,可以让我们采用更个性化的方法来评估这些患者心电图(ECG)变化的临床意义。方法:我们招募了6名男性和6名女性健康受试者。标准12导联心电图一式两份,每周1次,连续4周。我们计算了所有受试者的均值和标准差、重复读数(CVA)、个体内(CVI)和个体间(CVG)的方差系数(CV),并分别对男性和女性进行了方差分析。根据这些测量参数,我们确定了个体指数(II)、参考变化值(RCV)和维持稳态设定值所需的读数。结果:健康男性QRS间隔中位数(103.4 ms)高于女性(88.6 ms),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。整个队列QRS区间的CVA和CVI相对较低,分别为3.0和2.2。QRS区间的CVG相对较高,为12.9。性别间的QTc校正(QTc)间隔没有差异(分别为404毫秒和415毫秒)。合并受试者QRS的II为0.29,QTc的II为0.74。所有受试者QRS和QTc的RCV分别为10.3和7.1 msec。建立稳态设定点所需的样本数量为1,所有分析在接近10%的情况下,有95%的概率(P = 0.05)。结论:我们发现健康男性和女性在QRS持续时间和低II之间存在显著差异,特别是在QRS间期,这表明在这些ECG间期中CVG大于CVI。在这项研究中,我们还确定需要一个心电图来为患者建立一个稳态设定点。如果基线心电图可用,医学毒理学家将受益于使用基线追踪作为确定个体患者QRS和QTc延长的内部参考,而不是预先确定的通用阈值来管理中毒患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信