Emergency Department Utilization by Race, Ethnicity, Language, and Medicaid Status.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel J Berger, Colin Jenkins, John Wong-Castillo, Sarahrose Jonik, Nancy P Gordon
{"title":"Emergency Department Utilization by Race, Ethnicity, Language, and Medicaid Status.","authors":"Daniel J Berger, Colin Jenkins, John Wong-Castillo, Sarahrose Jonik, Nancy P Gordon","doi":"10.5811/westjem.41511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department (ED) use varies by age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, and payor type. Most studies comparing ED use by patients with English vs non-English preference (ELP/NELP) have used racially aggregated data, potentially masking differences across population subgroups. In this study we aimed to disaggregate the associations of race, ethnicity, language preference, and Medicaid coverage with ED utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional study electronic health record data for 2,047,105 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who were 25 - 85 years of age in January 2019 and had been continuous health plan members during 2018 - 2019. We tabulated the percentages of adults in seven racial and ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, South Asian) within three age groups (25 - 44, 45 - 64, 65 - 85) who had ≥1 ED visit in 2019. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine racial, ethnic, and language preference differences after adjusting for demographic and Medicaid status covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was 51.8% White, 53.2% female, 9.6% NELP, and 6.2% Medicaid-insured. Overall, 18% had ≥ 1 ED visit. Compared with White adults, Black and Hispanic adults were more likely and Chinese, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have ≥ 1 ED visit. After adjusting for all covariates, NELP adults 25 - 64 years of age were 10% less likely to have had an ED visit. However, while NELP was associated with a 10-20% lower ED visit prevalence among Hispanic, Filipino, Chinese, and Vietnamese adults 25 - 64, the prevalence was 10% higher among White and South Asian adults 45 - 64 and Filipino and South Asian adults aged 65 - 85. Adults with Medicaid coverage aged 25 - 64 were twice as likely and adults aged 65 - 85 were 50% more likely to have had ≥ 1 ED visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study of a US adult health-plan membership found several significant differences in ED use across racial, ethnic, and language subgroups and a higher prevalence of ED use by Medicaid-covered adults ≤ 65 years of age in most racial and ethnic groups. Our findings highlight the importance of using disaggregated data, particularly for Asian ethnic groups, when comparing ED use in different populations. Further research is needed to identify similarities and differences in social, personal, and policy factors driving ED use in diverse adult populations to better inform population-specific health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"951-959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.41511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) use varies by age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, and payor type. Most studies comparing ED use by patients with English vs non-English preference (ELP/NELP) have used racially aggregated data, potentially masking differences across population subgroups. In this study we aimed to disaggregate the associations of race, ethnicity, language preference, and Medicaid coverage with ED utilization.

Methods: We used cross-sectional study electronic health record data for 2,047,105 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who were 25 - 85 years of age in January 2019 and had been continuous health plan members during 2018 - 2019. We tabulated the percentages of adults in seven racial and ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, South Asian) within three age groups (25 - 44, 45 - 64, 65 - 85) who had ≥1 ED visit in 2019. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine racial, ethnic, and language preference differences after adjusting for demographic and Medicaid status covariates.

Results: The study population was 51.8% White, 53.2% female, 9.6% NELP, and 6.2% Medicaid-insured. Overall, 18% had ≥ 1 ED visit. Compared with White adults, Black and Hispanic adults were more likely and Chinese, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have ≥ 1 ED visit. After adjusting for all covariates, NELP adults 25 - 64 years of age were 10% less likely to have had an ED visit. However, while NELP was associated with a 10-20% lower ED visit prevalence among Hispanic, Filipino, Chinese, and Vietnamese adults 25 - 64, the prevalence was 10% higher among White and South Asian adults 45 - 64 and Filipino and South Asian adults aged 65 - 85. Adults with Medicaid coverage aged 25 - 64 were twice as likely and adults aged 65 - 85 were 50% more likely to have had ≥ 1 ED visit.

Conclusion: This study of a US adult health-plan membership found several significant differences in ED use across racial, ethnic, and language subgroups and a higher prevalence of ED use by Medicaid-covered adults ≤ 65 years of age in most racial and ethnic groups. Our findings highlight the importance of using disaggregated data, particularly for Asian ethnic groups, when comparing ED use in different populations. Further research is needed to identify similarities and differences in social, personal, and policy factors driving ED use in diverse adult populations to better inform population-specific health interventions.

急诊科使用率按种族、民族、语言和医疗补助状况划分。
简介:急诊科(ED)的使用因年龄、性别、种族、民族、语言偏好和付款人类型而异。大多数比较英语与非英语偏好(ELP/NELP)患者使用ED的研究都使用了种族汇总数据,可能掩盖了人群亚组之间的差异。在这项研究中,我们的目的是分解种族、民族、语言偏好和医疗补助覆盖与ED利用的关系。方法:我们使用了2047,105名Kaiser Permanente北加州会员的横断面研究电子健康记录数据,这些会员在2019年1月年龄在25 - 85岁之间,并且在2018 - 2019年期间是连续健康计划会员。我们将2019年7个种族和族裔群体(白人、黑人、西班牙裔、华人、菲律宾人、越南人、南亚人)在3个年龄组(25 - 44岁、45 - 64岁、65 - 85岁)中进行≥1次ED就诊的成年人百分比制成表格。在调整人口统计和医疗补助状态协变量后,使用修正对数泊松回归来检验种族、民族和语言偏好差异。结果:研究人群中白人占51.8%,女性占53.2%,东北裔占9.6%,医保参保占6.2%。总体而言,18%的患者有≥1次ED就诊。与白人成年人相比,黑人和西班牙裔成年人更有可能,而中国人、越南人和南亚成年人更不可能有≥1次ED就诊。在对所有协变量进行调整后,25 - 64岁的NELP成年人就诊的可能性降低了10%。然而,尽管在25 - 64岁的西班牙裔、菲律宾人、中国人和越南成年人中,NELP与ED就诊率降低10-20%有关,但在45 - 64岁的白人和南亚成年人以及65 - 85岁的菲律宾和南亚成年人中,患病率高出10%。25 - 64岁的医疗补助覆盖的成年人有两倍的可能性,65 - 85岁的成年人有≥1次ED就诊的可能性高出50%。结论:这项对美国成人健康计划成员的研究发现,ED的使用在种族、民族和语言亚组之间存在一些显著差异,并且在大多数种族和民族中,医疗补助覆盖的≤65岁的成年人使用ED的比例较高。我们的研究结果强调了在比较不同人群的ED使用情况时,使用分类数据的重要性,特别是对于亚洲族裔群体。需要进一步的研究来确定在不同成年人群中驱动ED使用的社会、个人和政策因素的异同,以便更好地为特定人群的健康干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信