Comparative Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Right-Rear Upright Intubation in a Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Cheng-Wei Tseng, Chung-Shiung Wen, Sheng-Han Yu, Yung-Cheng Su, Shu-Sheng Li, Hsin-Ling Chen, Tzu-Yao Hung
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Right-Rear Upright Intubation in a Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.","authors":"Cheng-Wei Tseng, Chung-Shiung Wen, Sheng-Han Yu, Yung-Cheng Su, Shu-Sheng Li, Hsin-Ling Chen, Tzu-Yao Hung","doi":"10.5811/westjem.39983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upright intubation is essential for managing difficult airways but can be challenging, especially for less experienced clinicians. Face-to-face intubation may lower first-pass success rates due to unfamiliar orientation. New videolaryngoscope devices have the potential to improve intubation success. We aimed to compare first-pass success rates, intubation duration, and glottic view between the right-rear and face-to-face approaches, using channeled videolaryngoscope, hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, and video stylet for upright intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-over manikin simulation study involving 30 participants-19 attending physicians, six residents, and five nurse practitioners-to compare the efficacy of these devices to a standard Macintosh videolaryngoscope, using both right-rear and face-to-face approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios for the following variables: first-pass success rate; intubation time; glottic view quality (Cormack-Lehane grade [C-L]); and percentage of glottis opening score (POGO]. The right-rear approach demonstrated a substantial improvement in first-pass success rates compared to face-to-face, with rates of 93% vs 78% and a hazard ratio of 2.10 (95% confidence interval 1.58-2.80). Additionally, both the video stylet and channeled videolaryngoscope techniques further optimized first-pass success rates and enhanced glottic visualization, achieving a CL grade I view and POGO scores of 100%, even in the inverted face-to-face orientation. These devices outperformed the standard Macintosh and hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The right-rear approach was associated with higher first-pass success rates and provided a more familiar orientation for operators during upright intubation. Video stylets and channeled videolaryngoscopes also contributed to improved success rates, shorter intubation times, and better glottic visualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"1086-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.39983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Upright intubation is essential for managing difficult airways but can be challenging, especially for less experienced clinicians. Face-to-face intubation may lower first-pass success rates due to unfamiliar orientation. New videolaryngoscope devices have the potential to improve intubation success. We aimed to compare first-pass success rates, intubation duration, and glottic view between the right-rear and face-to-face approaches, using channeled videolaryngoscope, hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, and video stylet for upright intubation.

Methods: We conducted a cross-over manikin simulation study involving 30 participants-19 attending physicians, six residents, and five nurse practitioners-to compare the efficacy of these devices to a standard Macintosh videolaryngoscope, using both right-rear and face-to-face approaches.

Results: We used Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios for the following variables: first-pass success rate; intubation time; glottic view quality (Cormack-Lehane grade [C-L]); and percentage of glottis opening score (POGO]. The right-rear approach demonstrated a substantial improvement in first-pass success rates compared to face-to-face, with rates of 93% vs 78% and a hazard ratio of 2.10 (95% confidence interval 1.58-2.80). Additionally, both the video stylet and channeled videolaryngoscope techniques further optimized first-pass success rates and enhanced glottic visualization, achieving a CL grade I view and POGO scores of 100%, even in the inverted face-to-face orientation. These devices outperformed the standard Macintosh and hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes.

Conclusion: The right-rear approach was associated with higher first-pass success rates and provided a more familiar orientation for operators during upright intubation. Video stylets and channeled videolaryngoscopes also contributed to improved success rates, shorter intubation times, and better glottic visualization.

在一项随机交叉人体研究中,面对面和右后直立插管的比较疗效。
简介:直立插管是必要的管理困难的气道,但可能具有挑战性,特别是对经验不足的临床医生。由于不熟悉的方向,面对面插管可能会降低首次通过的成功率。新的视频喉镜设备有可能提高插管成功率。我们的目的是比较第一次通过的成功率,插管时间,和声门视野之间的右后方和面对面入路,使用通道式视频喉镜,超角度视频喉镜,和视频风格直立插管。方法:我们进行了一项涉及30名参与者(19名主治医生、6名住院医生和5名执业护士)的交叉人体模拟研究,以比较这些设备与标准Macintosh视频喉镜的疗效,使用右后方和面对面的方法。结果:采用Cox回归分析计算以下变量的风险比:首次通过成功率;插管时间;声门观音质量(Cormack-Lehane分级[C-L]);声门开启分数(POGO)百分比。右后入路与面对面入路相比,首次通过成功率有显著提高,93% vs 78%,风险比为2.10(95%可信区间1.58-2.80)。此外,视频风格和通道式视频喉镜技术都进一步优化了一次通过成功率,增强了声门可视化,即使在倒挂面对面的情况下,也实现了CL级I视图和100%的POGO评分。这些设备的性能优于标准的麦金塔电脑和超角度视频喉镜。结论:右后方入路具有较高的首次通过成功率,并且在直立插管时为操作人员提供了更熟悉的方向。视频风格和通道视频喉镜也有助于提高成功率,缩短插管时间和更好的声门可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信