Cognitive Frame and Time Pressure as Moderators Of Clinical Reasoning: A Case Control Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Andrew J Monick, Xiao Chi Zhang
{"title":"Cognitive Frame and Time Pressure as Moderators Of Clinical Reasoning: A Case Control Study.","authors":"Andrew J Monick, Xiao Chi Zhang","doi":"10.5811/westjem.24851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency physicians (EP) are uniquely positioned to benefit from a deeper understanding of cognitive bias, particularly in the context of limited processing time. The framing effect-the tendency to evaluate identical information inconsistently given varying methods of presentation- presents a particular challenge within emergency medicine (EM). Understanding how the presentation of clinical information affects medical decision-making is paramount, given variability in how information is received. In this study we aimed to assess whether the imposition of a cognitive frame and time pressure affected participants' differential diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited attending physicians in emergency medicine (EM) and third-year EM residents via email from our university hospital. They were asked to review two case vignettes: one consistent with pulmonary embolism (PE), the other with interstitial lung disease. Each vignette had two versions, one emphasizing features consistent with the respective diagnoses. Each pair of vignettes contained objectively identical clinical information. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions based on 1) the specific or non-specific-frame version of each case and 2) the inclusion or exclusion of time pressure. Subjects provided their top three differential diagnoses for each case. Our primary outcome measure was identification of intended diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 subjects completed the study. Two-sided Fisher exact tests showed that varying cognitive frames affected the likelihood of EPs identifying PE as a diagnosis of interest (P = .01). Among EPs who identified PE, the likelihood of this diagnosis leading their differential diagnosis was also related to frame (P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this work reveal that cognitive frame and time pressure may independently influence diagnostic reasoning among emergency physicians, bearing implications for medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"1055-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.24851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency physicians (EP) are uniquely positioned to benefit from a deeper understanding of cognitive bias, particularly in the context of limited processing time. The framing effect-the tendency to evaluate identical information inconsistently given varying methods of presentation- presents a particular challenge within emergency medicine (EM). Understanding how the presentation of clinical information affects medical decision-making is paramount, given variability in how information is received. In this study we aimed to assess whether the imposition of a cognitive frame and time pressure affected participants' differential diagnoses.

Methods: We recruited attending physicians in emergency medicine (EM) and third-year EM residents via email from our university hospital. They were asked to review two case vignettes: one consistent with pulmonary embolism (PE), the other with interstitial lung disease. Each vignette had two versions, one emphasizing features consistent with the respective diagnoses. Each pair of vignettes contained objectively identical clinical information. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions based on 1) the specific or non-specific-frame version of each case and 2) the inclusion or exclusion of time pressure. Subjects provided their top three differential diagnoses for each case. Our primary outcome measure was identification of intended diagnosis.

Results: A total of 39 subjects completed the study. Two-sided Fisher exact tests showed that varying cognitive frames affected the likelihood of EPs identifying PE as a diagnosis of interest (P = .01). Among EPs who identified PE, the likelihood of this diagnosis leading their differential diagnosis was also related to frame (P = .01).

Conclusion: The results of this work reveal that cognitive frame and time pressure may independently influence diagnostic reasoning among emergency physicians, bearing implications for medical education.

认知框架和时间压力作为临床推理的调节因素:一项病例对照研究。
引言:急诊医生(EP)具有独特的优势,可以从对认知偏见的深入理解中受益,特别是在处理时间有限的情况下。框架效应——在不同的呈现方法下对相同信息进行不一致评估的倾向——在急诊医学(EM)中提出了一个特别的挑战。考虑到信息接受方式的多变性,理解临床信息的呈现如何影响医疗决策是至关重要的。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估认知框架和时间压力的施加是否影响参与者的鉴别诊断。方法:通过电子邮件招募我校医院急诊内科主治医师和急诊内科三年级住院医师。他们被要求回顾两个病例:一个是肺栓塞(PE),另一个是肺间质性疾病。每个小插图有两个版本,一个强调与各自诊断一致的特征。每对小插曲客观上包含相同的临床信息。受试者根据1)每个病例的特定或非特定框架版本以及2)纳入或排除时间压力随机分配到四种情况之一。受试者为每个病例提供了他们认为最重要的三种鉴别诊断。我们的主要结局指标是确定预期的诊断。结果:39名受试者完成了研究。双侧Fisher精确检验显示,不同的认知框架影响EPs将PE识别为感兴趣的诊断的可能性(P = 0.01)。在诊断为PE的EPs中,这种诊断导致其鉴别诊断的可能性也与框架相关(P = 0.01)。结论:本研究结果揭示认知框架和时间压力可能独立影响急诊医师的诊断推理,对医学教育具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信