Comparison of cycloplegic effects of atropine and tropicamide in children with refractive error.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-07-31 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.21037/tp-2025-404
Linxin Liu, Tingru Chen, Helena Prior Filipe, Jiong He
{"title":"Comparison of cycloplegic effects of atropine and tropicamide in children with refractive error.","authors":"Linxin Liu, Tingru Chen, Helena Prior Filipe, Jiong He","doi":"10.21037/tp-2025-404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refractive error is the primary cause of vision impairment in children and requires accurate cycloplegic refraction for proper diagnosis and treatment. Various cycloplegic agents are used clinically, but their comparative efficacy remains controversial, particularly across different pediatric age groups and refractive error types. The purpose of this study was to observe the cycloplegic effects of tropicamide and atropine in children of different ages and different refractive errors, and to screen out more suitable drugs for cycloplegia in children with different refractive errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a prospective cohort study. In this study, 110 children with refractive error were first dilated with 4 g/L of tropicamide eye drops; after the pupils recovered, they were dilated with 8 g/L of atropine eye ointment, and the results of the two pupil dilation methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In hyperopic eyes, the cycloplegic refraction obtained using the two methods was the same spherical correction in 8.45%; cylindrical correction differed by >0.25 D in 91.54%, 14.28% were the same, and 85.71% had a difference of ≥0.25 D. Compared with refraction using tropicamide, atropine refraction had a significantly higher mydriatic effect on spherical and cylindrical lenses in all age groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In the myopia group, among the spherical lenses, 13.04% of the eyes were the same, and 86.9% of the eyes had differences; among the cylindrical lenses, 20% of the eyes were the same, and 80% of the eyes had differences. The cycloplegic effect of 4 g/L of tropicamide eye drops on spherical and cylindrical lenses was less than that of 8 g/L of atropine eye ointment. In the mixed astigmatism group, among spherical lenses, 14 eyes had differences, accounting for 100.0% of cases, with the maximum difference being 1.25 D; among cylindrical lenses, 5 eyes had the same results between the two pupil dilation methods, accounting for 35.7% of cases, and 64.3% had a difference of 0.25-0.5 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children under 12 years old with mixed astigmatism and hyperopia, cycloplegic refraction using atropine is preferred over tropicamide.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"14 7","pages":"1616-1623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-2025-404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractive error is the primary cause of vision impairment in children and requires accurate cycloplegic refraction for proper diagnosis and treatment. Various cycloplegic agents are used clinically, but their comparative efficacy remains controversial, particularly across different pediatric age groups and refractive error types. The purpose of this study was to observe the cycloplegic effects of tropicamide and atropine in children of different ages and different refractive errors, and to screen out more suitable drugs for cycloplegia in children with different refractive errors.

Methods: This study is a prospective cohort study. In this study, 110 children with refractive error were first dilated with 4 g/L of tropicamide eye drops; after the pupils recovered, they were dilated with 8 g/L of atropine eye ointment, and the results of the two pupil dilation methods were compared.

Results: In hyperopic eyes, the cycloplegic refraction obtained using the two methods was the same spherical correction in 8.45%; cylindrical correction differed by >0.25 D in 91.54%, 14.28% were the same, and 85.71% had a difference of ≥0.25 D. Compared with refraction using tropicamide, atropine refraction had a significantly higher mydriatic effect on spherical and cylindrical lenses in all age groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In the myopia group, among the spherical lenses, 13.04% of the eyes were the same, and 86.9% of the eyes had differences; among the cylindrical lenses, 20% of the eyes were the same, and 80% of the eyes had differences. The cycloplegic effect of 4 g/L of tropicamide eye drops on spherical and cylindrical lenses was less than that of 8 g/L of atropine eye ointment. In the mixed astigmatism group, among spherical lenses, 14 eyes had differences, accounting for 100.0% of cases, with the maximum difference being 1.25 D; among cylindrical lenses, 5 eyes had the same results between the two pupil dilation methods, accounting for 35.7% of cases, and 64.3% had a difference of 0.25-0.5 D.

Conclusions: In children under 12 years old with mixed astigmatism and hyperopia, cycloplegic refraction using atropine is preferred over tropicamide.

阿托品与托品酰胺治疗屈光不正儿童单眼麻痹效果的比较。
背景:屈光不正是儿童视力损害的主要原因,需要准确的睫状体麻痹性屈光才能正确诊断和治疗。临床上使用多种单眼麻痹药物,但其相对疗效仍存在争议,特别是在不同儿童年龄组和屈光不正类型之间。本研究的目的是观察托品酰胺和阿托品在不同年龄、不同屈光不全儿童中的独眼麻痹效果,筛选出更适合不同屈光不全儿童独眼麻痹的药物。方法:本研究为前瞻性队列研究。在这项研究中,110名屈光不正儿童首先使用4 g/L的tropicamide滴眼液进行扩张;瞳孔恢复后,用8 g/L的阿托品眼膏扩大瞳孔,比较两种瞳孔扩大方法的效果。结果:在远视眼中,两种方法获得的截瘫屈光度相同,球面矫正率为8.45%;与托品酰胺屈光相比,各年龄组阿托品屈光对球面和柱面晶状体的散光效果明显高于托品酰胺,差异有统计学意义(p)结论:12岁以下混合性散光和远视儿童,阿托品屈光优于托品酰胺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信