Comparison of the efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol tailor-made for head and neck free flap oncosurgery with conventional perioperative care: A randomised clinical trial.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1324_24
Shagun B Shah, Nikhil Bhasin, Ajay K Dewan, Rajiv Chawla, Rajan Arora, Charanjeet Kaur
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol tailor-made for head and neck free flap oncosurgery with conventional perioperative care: A randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Shagun B Shah, Nikhil Bhasin, Ajay K Dewan, Rajiv Chawla, Rajan Arora, Charanjeet Kaur","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1324_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Technological advances, accumulated experience, and evidence have made free-flap reconstruction [using the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and free fibular flap (FF)] for head and neck oncosurgical defects a routine procedure. This study aimed to assess the impact on recovery after head and neck oncosurgery by preoperative optimisation, intraoperative stress minimisation, and postoperative protocolised normalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study included 60 adult patients undergoing head and neck oncosurgery with ALT/FF reconstruction, allocated to either the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group (Group E) or the conventional care group (Group C). Our primary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and time to Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT). Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) stay, serum lactate, creatinine, and opioid consumption comprised the secondary outcome measures. An independent sample <i>t</i>-test or Welch test was performed for continuous variables, and a Chi-square test was used for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean LOS and time to RIOT [9.97 (standard deviation (SD): 2.19) and 34.6 (SD: 9.22) days] were significantly shorter in Group E versus Group C (10.97 (SD: 1.45) and 43.8 (SD: 20.89) days) (mean difference (MD): 1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04, 1.96, <i>P</i> = 0.042, and MD: 9.2, 95% CI: 0.77, 17.63, <i>P</i> = 0.033, respectively). Mean pre-incisional, post-resection, and postoperative lactate levels were significantly lower in Group E versus Group C (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Serum creatinine levels on the morning of surgery were significantly lower in Group E (<i>P</i> = 0.0225).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At least 90% compliance with the described 15-element ERAS protocol reduces LOS and time to RIOT in head-neck oncosurgery patients with free-flap reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 8","pages":"824-831"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1324_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Technological advances, accumulated experience, and evidence have made free-flap reconstruction [using the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and free fibular flap (FF)] for head and neck oncosurgical defects a routine procedure. This study aimed to assess the impact on recovery after head and neck oncosurgery by preoperative optimisation, intraoperative stress minimisation, and postoperative protocolised normalisation.

Methods: This randomised study included 60 adult patients undergoing head and neck oncosurgery with ALT/FF reconstruction, allocated to either the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group (Group E) or the conventional care group (Group C). Our primary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and time to Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT). Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) stay, serum lactate, creatinine, and opioid consumption comprised the secondary outcome measures. An independent sample t-test or Welch test was performed for continuous variables, and a Chi-square test was used for categorical variables.

Results: Mean LOS and time to RIOT [9.97 (standard deviation (SD): 2.19) and 34.6 (SD: 9.22) days] were significantly shorter in Group E versus Group C (10.97 (SD: 1.45) and 43.8 (SD: 20.89) days) (mean difference (MD): 1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04, 1.96, P = 0.042, and MD: 9.2, 95% CI: 0.77, 17.63, P = 0.033, respectively). Mean pre-incisional, post-resection, and postoperative lactate levels were significantly lower in Group E versus Group C (P < 0.0001). Serum creatinine levels on the morning of surgery were significantly lower in Group E (P = 0.0225).

Conclusion: At least 90% compliance with the described 15-element ERAS protocol reduces LOS and time to RIOT in head-neck oncosurgery patients with free-flap reconstruction.

为头颈部游离皮瓣肿瘤手术量身定制的ERAS方案与常规围手术期护理的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景与目的:技术的进步、经验的积累和证据使得自由皮瓣重建[利用大腿前外侧皮瓣(ALT)和游离腓骨皮瓣(FF)]治疗头颈部肿瘤外科缺损已成为常规手术。本研究旨在评估术前优化、术中应激最小化和术后规范化对头颈部肿瘤手术后恢复的影响。方法:这项随机研究包括60例接受头颈部肿瘤手术并进行ALT/FF重建的成年患者,分为术后增强恢复组(E组)和常规护理组(C组)。我们的主要结局指标是住院时间(LOS)和返回预期肿瘤治疗(RIOT)的时间。外科重症监护病房(SICU)的住院时间、血清乳酸、肌酐和阿片类药物的消耗是次要指标。对连续变量采用独立样本t检验或Welch检验,对分类变量采用卡方检验。结果:E组的平均LOS和RIOT时间[9.97(标准差(SD): 2.19)和34.6 (SD: 9.22)天]明显短于C组(10.97 (SD: 1.45)和43.8 (SD: 20.89)天)(平均差值(MD): 1, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.04, 1.96, P = 0.042, MD: 9.2, 95% CI: 0.77, 17.63, P = 0.033)。E组切口前、切除后和术后乳酸水平均显著低于C组(P < 0.0001)。E组患者手术当日上午血清肌酐水平明显降低(P = 0.0225)。结论:至少90%的头颈部肿瘤手术自由皮瓣重建患者遵守15元素ERAS方案可减少LOS和RIOT时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信