Eqram Rahman, William Richard Webb, Parinitha Rao, Jean D A Carruthers
{"title":"Mutation-aware formulation: a genomic framework for equitable global dermocosmetics.","authors":"Eqram Rahman, William Richard Webb, Parinitha Rao, Jean D A Carruthers","doi":"10.1007/s00439-025-02771-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advances in dermatogenomics, the global skincare industry continues to rely on generalized formulation strategies that overlook population-specific genetic variation. This study introduces a mutation-aware framework that bridges this translational gap through two novel metrics: the Mutation Burden Index (MBI)-which quantifies regional genetic vulnerability across nine core skin function domains-and the Population Compatibility Burden (PCB)-which measures the alignment between current commercial formulations and regional genomic needs. Using a curated database of more than 200 authenticated cosmeceutical products, we mapped ingredient functionality against regional MBI profiles. Results reveal a stark compatibility gap: regions with the highest burden (e.g., Africa, South Asia) receive the least functionally aligned products, with average compatibility scores as low as 0.35. In contrast, Europe-despite lower burden-achieves scores > 0.70. Simulated formulations informed by MBI scores increased compatibility to > 0.80 in underserved regions, demonstrating the potential for 50% gains in biological relevance without individualized genotyping. A machine learning classifier trained on MBI vectors achieved strong performance (F1 = 0.837), and SHAP-based interpretation highlighted barrier and pigmentation pathways as key drivers of product-region mismatch. In contrast to commercial AI platforms offer black-box personalization with minimal genomic input and no interpretability, our model provides transparent, biologically grounded, and reproducible formulation logic. By repositioning personalization from individual-level luxury to population-scale equity, this work establishes a practical foundation for genomically aligned skincare-anchored in functional biology, enabled by AI, and designed for global impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1011-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02771-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite advances in dermatogenomics, the global skincare industry continues to rely on generalized formulation strategies that overlook population-specific genetic variation. This study introduces a mutation-aware framework that bridges this translational gap through two novel metrics: the Mutation Burden Index (MBI)-which quantifies regional genetic vulnerability across nine core skin function domains-and the Population Compatibility Burden (PCB)-which measures the alignment between current commercial formulations and regional genomic needs. Using a curated database of more than 200 authenticated cosmeceutical products, we mapped ingredient functionality against regional MBI profiles. Results reveal a stark compatibility gap: regions with the highest burden (e.g., Africa, South Asia) receive the least functionally aligned products, with average compatibility scores as low as 0.35. In contrast, Europe-despite lower burden-achieves scores > 0.70. Simulated formulations informed by MBI scores increased compatibility to > 0.80 in underserved regions, demonstrating the potential for 50% gains in biological relevance without individualized genotyping. A machine learning classifier trained on MBI vectors achieved strong performance (F1 = 0.837), and SHAP-based interpretation highlighted barrier and pigmentation pathways as key drivers of product-region mismatch. In contrast to commercial AI platforms offer black-box personalization with minimal genomic input and no interpretability, our model provides transparent, biologically grounded, and reproducible formulation logic. By repositioning personalization from individual-level luxury to population-scale equity, this work establishes a practical foundation for genomically aligned skincare-anchored in functional biology, enabled by AI, and designed for global impact.
期刊介绍:
Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology.
Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted.
The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.