Ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block versus thoracic erector spinae block for post-thoracotomy pain: A randomised double-blinded non-inferior clinical study.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_3_25
Saad A Moharam, Mohammed S ElSharkawy, Mhmoud A Almohasseb, Khaled Hamama, Mohamed A Mahmoud, Marwa A Abogabal
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block versus thoracic erector spinae block for post-thoracotomy pain: A randomised double-blinded non-inferior clinical study.","authors":"Saad A Moharam, Mohammed S ElSharkawy, Mhmoud A Almohasseb, Khaled Hamama, Mohamed A Mahmoud, Marwa A Abogabal","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_3_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Regional techniques are preferred for controlling post-thoracotomy pain due to lower complication rates. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) with thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for post-thoracotomy pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised, double-blind, non-inferior clinical study involved 60 cases scheduled for thoracic surgery. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups: ESPB and EOIB groups. Using 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of the thoracic vertebrae 5, both blocks were performed after induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesic request postoperatively, numerical rating scale (NRS) score during rest and with coughing, and occurrence of complications. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normally distributed variables, the Student's <i>t</i>-test was used for normally distributed variables, and the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who required intraoperative fentanyl, time of first request for analgesia, total morphine consumption, and pain score within the first 24 hours post-surgery were comparable between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.347, 0.085, and 0.354, respectively). Both groups exhibited comparable incidences of hypotension and bradycardia (<i>P</i> = 0.353 and <i>P</i> > 0.99, respectively). Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) and pneumothorax did not occur in any patient in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analgesic effect of EOIB was non-inferior to ESPB for post-thoracotomy pain, as evidenced by comparable total opioid consumption, time of first request for analgesia, and pain score in the first 24 hours post-surgery. Additionally, EOIB demonstrated the same level of safety as ESPB.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 8","pages":"809-815"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_3_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Regional techniques are preferred for controlling post-thoracotomy pain due to lower complication rates. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) with thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for post-thoracotomy pain.

Methods: This randomised, double-blind, non-inferior clinical study involved 60 cases scheduled for thoracic surgery. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups: ESPB and EOIB groups. Using 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of the thoracic vertebrae 5, both blocks were performed after induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesic request postoperatively, numerical rating scale (NRS) score during rest and with coughing, and occurrence of complications. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normally distributed variables, the Student's t-test was used for normally distributed variables, and the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: Patients who required intraoperative fentanyl, time of first request for analgesia, total morphine consumption, and pain score within the first 24 hours post-surgery were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.347, 0.085, and 0.354, respectively). Both groups exhibited comparable incidences of hypotension and bradycardia (P = 0.353 and P > 0.99, respectively). Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) and pneumothorax did not occur in any patient in either group.

Conclusion: The analgesic effect of EOIB was non-inferior to ESPB for post-thoracotomy pain, as evidenced by comparable total opioid consumption, time of first request for analgesia, and pain score in the first 24 hours post-surgery. Additionally, EOIB demonstrated the same level of safety as ESPB.

超声引导下外斜肋间平面阻滞与胸直立者脊柱阻滞治疗开胸术后疼痛:一项随机双盲非隐性临床研究。
背景和目的:由于并发症发生率较低,局部手术是控制开胸术后疼痛的首选方法。本研究旨在比较超声引导下外斜肋间阻滞(EOIB)与胸直椎平面阻滞(ESPB)对开胸术后疼痛的镇痛效果和安全性。方法:这项随机、双盲、非劣势临床研究纳入了60例计划进行胸外科手术的患者。病例随机分为两组:ESPB组和EOIB组。全麻诱导后,采用30 mL 0.25%布比卡因在胸椎5水平阻滞。主要观察指标为术后24小时吗啡用量。次要指标为术后首次镇痛时间、休息和咳嗽时的数值评定量表(NRS)评分、并发症发生情况。对非正态分布变量采用非参数Wilcoxon检验,对正态分布变量采用Student’st检验,对定性变量采用卡方/Fisher精确检验。显著性水平为P≤0.05。结果:两组患者术中芬太尼用量、首次请求镇痛时间、吗啡总用量、术后24小时内疼痛评分具有可比性(P分别为0.347、0.085、0.354)。两组的低血压和心动过缓发生率相当(P = 0.353和P = 0.99)。两组均未发生局麻全身毒性(LAST)和气胸。结论:EOIB对开胸术后疼痛的镇痛效果不低于ESPB,这可以从阿片类药物总用量、首次请求镇痛时间和术后24小时疼痛评分的比较中得到证明。此外,EOIB表现出与ESPB相同的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信