Testing the effect of a dynamic descriptive social norm message on meat-free food selection in worksite cafeterias: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elif Naz Çoker, Rachel Pechey, Susan A Jebb
{"title":"Testing the effect of a dynamic descriptive social norm message on meat-free food selection in worksite cafeterias: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Elif Naz Çoker, Rachel Pechey, Susan A Jebb","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04302-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overconsumption of meat is a threat to planetary health. Meat consumption is socially and culturally patterned, and interventions using social norms could be a promising strategy to encourage meat reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and tested the effectiveness of a dynamic descriptive social norm message displayed in worksite cafeterias (N = 25, intervention = 12, control = 13) to increase meat-free meal selection. The message was developed based on existing evidence and in collaboration with the catering company operating the cafeterias. The message communicated a specific change in target behavior, using a relevant and relatable referent group, grounding the desired behavior change in time and place, and included a clear call to action. The social norm messages were displayed in each intervention cafeteria for 8 weeks on free-standing banners, posters, and floor stickers. We compared the change in weekly percentage of meat-free meal sales (measured as number of meals sold) between intervention and control cafeterias through linear mixed-effects models. We conducted fidelity checks in intervention cafeterias and interviewed customers to assess perceptions of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no evidence that the intervention led to an increase in sales of meat-free meals (- 2.22 percentage point change, 95% CIs [- 7.33, 2.90], p = 0.378). Pre-intervention baseline sales of meat-free meals varied by site, but there was no evidence the intervention was differentially effective for sites with higher vs. lower baselines. There was also no evidence that the intervention changed overall meal sales. The intervention was implemented with high fidelity, though out of 155 customers interviewed, 57% reported that they did not notice the messages, and only 2% correctly recalled the message.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence that empirically informed and co-created dynamic descriptive social norm messages increased selection of meat-free meals in worksite cafeterias. This could be due to low salience of the intervention in a busy, fast-paced environment, or the strength of existing eating habits in a workplace cafeteria. The findings suggest that norm messaging interventions, when delivered as an isolated intervention, may not be effective to change a complex and socially grounded dietary behavior such as meat consumption.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>OSF Registries, Registered September 23, 2022, https://osf.io/h7zkf.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"474"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04302-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overconsumption of meat is a threat to planetary health. Meat consumption is socially and culturally patterned, and interventions using social norms could be a promising strategy to encourage meat reduction.

Methods: We developed and tested the effectiveness of a dynamic descriptive social norm message displayed in worksite cafeterias (N = 25, intervention = 12, control = 13) to increase meat-free meal selection. The message was developed based on existing evidence and in collaboration with the catering company operating the cafeterias. The message communicated a specific change in target behavior, using a relevant and relatable referent group, grounding the desired behavior change in time and place, and included a clear call to action. The social norm messages were displayed in each intervention cafeteria for 8 weeks on free-standing banners, posters, and floor stickers. We compared the change in weekly percentage of meat-free meal sales (measured as number of meals sold) between intervention and control cafeterias through linear mixed-effects models. We conducted fidelity checks in intervention cafeterias and interviewed customers to assess perceptions of the intervention.

Results: There was no evidence that the intervention led to an increase in sales of meat-free meals (- 2.22 percentage point change, 95% CIs [- 7.33, 2.90], p = 0.378). Pre-intervention baseline sales of meat-free meals varied by site, but there was no evidence the intervention was differentially effective for sites with higher vs. lower baselines. There was also no evidence that the intervention changed overall meal sales. The intervention was implemented with high fidelity, though out of 155 customers interviewed, 57% reported that they did not notice the messages, and only 2% correctly recalled the message.

Conclusions: There was no evidence that empirically informed and co-created dynamic descriptive social norm messages increased selection of meat-free meals in worksite cafeterias. This could be due to low salience of the intervention in a busy, fast-paced environment, or the strength of existing eating habits in a workplace cafeteria. The findings suggest that norm messaging interventions, when delivered as an isolated intervention, may not be effective to change a complex and socially grounded dietary behavior such as meat consumption.

Trial registration: OSF Registries, Registered September 23, 2022, https://osf.io/h7zkf.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

测试动态描述性社会规范信息对工作场所自助餐厅无肉食品选择的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:过度食用肉类是对地球健康的威胁。肉类消费是社会和文化模式,使用社会规范的干预措施可能是鼓励减少肉类的有希望的策略。方法:我们开发并测试了在工作场所自助餐厅展示动态描述性社会规范信息的有效性(N = 25,干预= 12,对照= 13),以增加无肉餐的选择。这条信息是根据现有证据与经营自助餐厅的餐饮公司合作制定的。该信息传达了目标行为的具体变化,使用相关且相关的参考群体,在时间和地点确定期望的行为变化,并包括明确的行动呼吁。社会规范信息在每个干预自助餐厅的独立横幅、海报和地板贴纸上展示了8周。我们通过线性混合效应模型比较了干预和控制食堂之间每周无肉餐销售百分比的变化(以售出的餐数衡量)。我们在干预自助餐厅进行了保真度检查,并采访了顾客,以评估对干预的看法。结果:没有证据表明干预导致无肉餐的销售增加(- 2.22个百分点的变化,95% ci [- 7.33, 2.90], p = 0.378)。干预前无肉餐的基线销售额因地点而异,但没有证据表明干预对基线较高和较低的地点有不同的效果。也没有证据表明干预改变了整体膳食销售。尽管在155名受访客户中,57%的人表示他们没有注意到这些信息,只有2%的人正确地回忆起了这些信息,但干预措施的实施保真度很高。结论:没有证据表明经验告知和共同创造的动态描述性社会规范信息增加了工作场所自助餐厅中无肉餐的选择。这可能是由于在繁忙、快节奏的环境中,干预的显着性较低,或者是工作场所食堂现有饮食习惯的强度。研究结果表明,当作为一种孤立的干预手段进行规范信息传递干预时,可能无法有效地改变复杂的、基于社会的饮食行为,如肉类消费。试验注册:OSF登记处,注册于2022年9月23日,https://osf.io/h7zkf。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信