Implementation status of European guidelines on trauma management of prehospital bleeding control: a national survey in Austria.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Julia Doescher, Sibylle Langenecker
{"title":"Implementation status of European guidelines on trauma management of prehospital bleeding control: a national survey in Austria.","authors":"Julia Doescher, Sibylle Langenecker","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01312-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma, particularly injuries involving massive bleeding, is a leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Prehospital setting plays a critical role, with bleeding control being a primary focus. While guidelines like the European and German Bleeding Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for bleeding management, the extent to which these guidelines are implemented by emergency physicians in the prehospital setting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted in Austria to assess emergency physicians' familiarity with and implementation of the European and German Bleeding Guidelines on bleeding control in prehospital settings. The survey was distributed through emergency medical organizations in Austria, gathering 116 responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite high awareness of the Bleeding Guidelines (81%), only 41% of new recommendations were implemented. Moreover, only 50% adhere to recommendations that were already included in previous versions. A questionnaire assessing knowledge about the Bleeding Guidelines' content revealed a mean score of 13.5 ± 4.37 (maximum score of 26 points), indicating a gap in knowledge application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential for improving the implementation of trauma and bleeding management Guidelines in the prehospital setting. The findings indicate that, despite a strong awareness of the Bleeding Guidelines, a gap exists between knowledge and practical application. This gap underscores the need for enhanced training, regular continuing education, and the use of algorithms and checklists to support Bleeding Guideline adherence. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this non-adherence, and additional qualitative research in this field is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01312-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma, particularly injuries involving massive bleeding, is a leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Prehospital setting plays a critical role, with bleeding control being a primary focus. While guidelines like the European and German Bleeding Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for bleeding management, the extent to which these guidelines are implemented by emergency physicians in the prehospital setting remains unclear.

Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted in Austria to assess emergency physicians' familiarity with and implementation of the European and German Bleeding Guidelines on bleeding control in prehospital settings. The survey was distributed through emergency medical organizations in Austria, gathering 116 responses.

Results: Despite high awareness of the Bleeding Guidelines (81%), only 41% of new recommendations were implemented. Moreover, only 50% adhere to recommendations that were already included in previous versions. A questionnaire assessing knowledge about the Bleeding Guidelines' content revealed a mean score of 13.5 ± 4.37 (maximum score of 26 points), indicating a gap in knowledge application.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential for improving the implementation of trauma and bleeding management Guidelines in the prehospital setting. The findings indicate that, despite a strong awareness of the Bleeding Guidelines, a gap exists between knowledge and practical application. This gap underscores the need for enhanced training, regular continuing education, and the use of algorithms and checklists to support Bleeding Guideline adherence. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this non-adherence, and additional qualitative research in this field is essential.

欧洲院前出血控制创伤管理指南的实施状况:奥地利的一项全国调查。
背景:创伤,特别是涉及大出血的伤害,是全世界可预防死亡的主要原因。院前设置起着至关重要的作用,出血控制是首要重点。虽然像欧洲和德国出血指南这样的指南为出血管理提供了基于证据的建议,但急诊医生在院前环境中实施这些指南的程度仍不清楚。方法:在奥地利进行了一项全国性的在线调查,以评估急诊医生对院前出血控制的欧洲和德国出血指南的熟悉程度和实施情况。这项调查是通过奥地利的紧急医疗组织分发的,收集了116份答复。结果:尽管对出血指南的认知度很高(81%),但只有41%的新建议得到了实施。此外,只有50%的人遵循之前版本中已经包含的建议。对《出血指南》内容知识知晓程度的问卷调查平均得分为13.5±4.37分,最高得分为26分,表明患者在知识运用方面存在差距。结论:本研究强调了在院前环境中改进创伤和出血管理指南实施的潜力。研究结果表明,尽管对出血指南有很强的认识,但在知识和实际应用之间存在差距。这一差距强调需要加强培训,定期继续教育,并使用算法和检查表来支持出血指南的遵守。需要进一步的研究来探索这种不依从性的原因,并且在这一领域进行额外的定性研究是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信