Xiaofei Jiao, Jiahao Liu, Yijie Wu, Qing Zhong, Li Zhu, Linghui Wang, Huayi Li, Minghua Xiang, Xuejiao Zhao, Guangnian Zhao, Gordon B. Mills, Ding Ma, Qinglei Gao, Yong Fang
{"title":"Sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i enhances antitumor immune responses in preclinical models of ovarian cancer","authors":"Xiaofei Jiao, Jiahao Liu, Yijie Wu, Qing Zhong, Li Zhu, Linghui Wang, Huayi Li, Minghua Xiang, Xuejiao Zhao, Guangnian Zhao, Gordon B. Mills, Ding Ma, Qinglei Gao, Yong Fang","doi":"10.1126/scitranslmed.adu6989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.</div>","PeriodicalId":21580,"journal":{"name":"Science Translational Medicine","volume":"17 811","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adu6989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.
期刊介绍:
Science Translational Medicine is an online journal that focuses on publishing research at the intersection of science, engineering, and medicine. The goal of the journal is to promote human health by providing a platform for researchers from various disciplines to communicate their latest advancements in biomedical, translational, and clinical research.
The journal aims to address the slow translation of scientific knowledge into effective treatments and health measures. It publishes articles that fill the knowledge gaps between preclinical research and medical applications, with a focus on accelerating the translation of knowledge into new ways of preventing, diagnosing, and treating human diseases.
The scope of Science Translational Medicine includes various areas such as cardiovascular disease, immunology/vaccines, metabolism/diabetes/obesity, neuroscience/neurology/psychiatry, cancer, infectious diseases, policy, behavior, bioengineering, chemical genomics/drug discovery, imaging, applied physical sciences, medical nanotechnology, drug delivery, biomarkers, gene therapy/regenerative medicine, toxicology and pharmacokinetics, data mining, cell culture, animal and human studies, medical informatics, and other interdisciplinary approaches to medicine.
The target audience of the journal includes researchers and management in academia, government, and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. It is also relevant to physician scientists, regulators, policy makers, investors, business developers, and funding agencies.