Sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i enhances antitumor immune responses in preclinical models of ovarian cancer

IF 14.6 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Xiaofei Jiao, Jiahao Liu, Yijie Wu, Qing Zhong, Li Zhu, Linghui Wang, Huayi Li, Minghua Xiang, Xuejiao Zhao, Guangnian Zhao, Gordon B. Mills, Ding Ma, Qinglei Gao, Yong Fang
{"title":"Sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i enhances antitumor immune responses in preclinical models of ovarian cancer","authors":"Xiaofei Jiao,&nbsp;Jiahao Liu,&nbsp;Yijie Wu,&nbsp;Qing Zhong,&nbsp;Li Zhu,&nbsp;Linghui Wang,&nbsp;Huayi Li,&nbsp;Minghua Xiang,&nbsp;Xuejiao Zhao,&nbsp;Guangnian Zhao,&nbsp;Gordon B. Mills,&nbsp;Ding Ma,&nbsp;Qinglei Gao,&nbsp;Yong Fang","doi":"10.1126/scitranslmed.adu6989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.</div>","PeriodicalId":21580,"journal":{"name":"Science Translational Medicine","volume":"17 811","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adu6989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.
在卵巢癌临床前模型中,PARPi和WEE1i序次治疗可增强抗肿瘤免疫反应
DNA损伤反应抑制剂(DDRis)的抗肿瘤活性部分归因于其增强免疫反应的能力。然而,DDRi对淋巴细胞的毒性,特别是当DDRi与其他靶向细胞周期检查点激酶的治疗联合使用时,表明需要开发不同的DDRi治疗方案。在这里,我们系统地评估了肿瘤免疫微环境(TIME)在卵巢癌不同治疗时间线对DDRis的反应。通过单细胞分析,我们发现,与单用和同时使用的治疗相比,先使用聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶(PARPi)抑制剂,然后使用细胞周期检查点激酶WEE1 (WEE1i)抑制剂,在体内可以更有效地根除癌症,并产生更强的抗肿瘤免疫反应。顺序和并行治疗方案均可诱导癌细胞致死性DNA损伤并激活cGAS-STING通路,但顺序治疗方案的T细胞活力更高。蛋白质组学分析表明,与癌细胞相比,DDRi治疗后T细胞从DNA损伤中恢复得更快。在同基因高级别浆液性卵巢癌小鼠模型和治疗耐药卵巢癌患者来源的异种移植模型中,与单药治疗相比,免疫检查点治疗和CAR - T细胞联合序贯治疗更有效。我们的研究表明,PARPi和WEE1i序贯治疗可使T细胞免于严重的DNA损伤,并激活癌细胞中的cGAS-STING通路,表明可以通过改变治疗方案来优化抗肿瘤免疫和控制肿瘤生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Translational Medicine
Science Translational Medicine CELL BIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
26.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
309
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Science Translational Medicine is an online journal that focuses on publishing research at the intersection of science, engineering, and medicine. The goal of the journal is to promote human health by providing a platform for researchers from various disciplines to communicate their latest advancements in biomedical, translational, and clinical research. The journal aims to address the slow translation of scientific knowledge into effective treatments and health measures. It publishes articles that fill the knowledge gaps between preclinical research and medical applications, with a focus on accelerating the translation of knowledge into new ways of preventing, diagnosing, and treating human diseases. The scope of Science Translational Medicine includes various areas such as cardiovascular disease, immunology/vaccines, metabolism/diabetes/obesity, neuroscience/neurology/psychiatry, cancer, infectious diseases, policy, behavior, bioengineering, chemical genomics/drug discovery, imaging, applied physical sciences, medical nanotechnology, drug delivery, biomarkers, gene therapy/regenerative medicine, toxicology and pharmacokinetics, data mining, cell culture, animal and human studies, medical informatics, and other interdisciplinary approaches to medicine. The target audience of the journal includes researchers and management in academia, government, and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. It is also relevant to physician scientists, regulators, policy makers, investors, business developers, and funding agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信