The onset of the British Imperial retreat from China: Evidence from the Chinese sovereign bond market in London

0 ECONOMICS
Dan Li, Hao Tang, Yajie Wang
{"title":"The onset of the British Imperial retreat from China: Evidence from the Chinese sovereign bond market in London","authors":"Dan Li,&nbsp;Hao Tang,&nbsp;Yajie Wang","doi":"10.1111/aehr.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the British Empire's retreat from China through the lens of London investors in Chinese sovereign bonds (1898–1938). Using structural break analysis on weekly spreads between Chinese bonds—secured by British-controlled customs and salt revenues—and British Consols, it identifies key shifts. Spreads surged over 70% during the Northern Expedition (1926–1928), coinciding with Britain's shift from ‘gunboat diplomacy’ to concessions, signalling investor perceptions of declining imperial oversight. A subsequent break at the Expedition's conclusion saw spreads narrow by 24% to 54%, not due to a resurgence of British influence, but to the Nationalist Government's split from the Communist Party and Bolsheviks and its pledge to honour existing debts. However, in the post-Expedition era, perceived risk in Chinese bonds rose, reflected in a sharp increase in bond return volatility and a heightened co-movement between London and domestic bond returns. Realising their government could no longer guarantee the credibility of Chinese bonds, London investors adjusted their strategy, closely tracking developments in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"65 2","pages":"215-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aehr.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the British Empire's retreat from China through the lens of London investors in Chinese sovereign bonds (1898–1938). Using structural break analysis on weekly spreads between Chinese bonds—secured by British-controlled customs and salt revenues—and British Consols, it identifies key shifts. Spreads surged over 70% during the Northern Expedition (1926–1928), coinciding with Britain's shift from ‘gunboat diplomacy’ to concessions, signalling investor perceptions of declining imperial oversight. A subsequent break at the Expedition's conclusion saw spreads narrow by 24% to 54%, not due to a resurgence of British influence, but to the Nationalist Government's split from the Communist Party and Bolsheviks and its pledge to honour existing debts. However, in the post-Expedition era, perceived risk in Chinese bonds rose, reflected in a sharp increase in bond return volatility and a heightened co-movement between London and domestic bond returns. Realising their government could no longer guarantee the credibility of Chinese bonds, London investors adjusted their strategy, closely tracking developments in China.

大英帝国从中国撤退的开始:来自伦敦中国主权债券市场的证据
本研究通过投资中国主权债券的伦敦投资者(1898-1938)的视角,探讨了大英帝国退出中国的过程。通过对中国债券(由英国控制的海关和盐收入担保)与英国国债之间的周差进行结构性断裂分析,它发现了关键的变化。在北伐(1926-1928)期间,息差飙升超过70%,恰逢英国从“炮舰外交”转向让步,这表明投资者认为帝国的监管正在减弱。远征结束后,差距缩小了24%到54%,这不是由于英国的影响重新出现,而是由于国民政府与共产党和布尔什维克的分裂以及它承诺偿还现有债务。然而,在后探险队时代,中国债券的感知风险上升,反映在债券回报波动性急剧上升,以及伦敦和国内债券回报之间的联动加剧。在意识到英国政府无法再保证中国债券的可信度后,伦敦投资者调整了策略,密切关注中国的事态发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信