Progressive and Far-Right Parties: Between Demands for and Supply of Civic Political Engagement—Qualitative-Comparative Case Study of Poland

Anna Pacześniak, Maciej Bachryj
{"title":"Progressive and Far-Right Parties: Between Demands for and Supply of Civic Political Engagement—Qualitative-Comparative Case Study of Poland","authors":"Anna Pacześniak,&nbsp;Maciej Bachryj","doi":"10.1002/cep4.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The links between political parties and civil society organisations (CSOs), initiatives and social movements has been transforming. Cross-fertilizing allies in the past, often interpenetrating ideologically and personally, nowadays have become much more alienated from each other. Nonetheless, political parties still seek to form relations with CSOs and initiatives. Parties with low office aspiration, such as far-right and radical left ones, by offering less binding and informal opportunities for political activity, have a potential to meet citizens' demands for more horizontal engagement. On the empirical level, the paper focuses on two Polish political parties: the progressive Left Together (Lewica Razem) and the far-right Confederation Liberty and Independence (Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość), to identify how both parties perceive and incorporate participatory demands. Using a qualitative analysis based on individual in-depth interviews with party politicians, this study aims to compare the diagnoses of the demand for civic engagement formulated by parties from opposite sides of the political spectrum, and their supply to nonpartisan political activists.</p>","PeriodicalId":100329,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary European Politics","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cep4.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cep4.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The links between political parties and civil society organisations (CSOs), initiatives and social movements has been transforming. Cross-fertilizing allies in the past, often interpenetrating ideologically and personally, nowadays have become much more alienated from each other. Nonetheless, political parties still seek to form relations with CSOs and initiatives. Parties with low office aspiration, such as far-right and radical left ones, by offering less binding and informal opportunities for political activity, have a potential to meet citizens' demands for more horizontal engagement. On the empirical level, the paper focuses on two Polish political parties: the progressive Left Together (Lewica Razem) and the far-right Confederation Liberty and Independence (Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość), to identify how both parties perceive and incorporate participatory demands. Using a qualitative analysis based on individual in-depth interviews with party politicians, this study aims to compare the diagnoses of the demand for civic engagement formulated by parties from opposite sides of the political spectrum, and their supply to nonpartisan political activists.

进步与极右翼政党:公民政治参与的需求与供给之间——波兰定性比较案例研究
政党与公民社会组织(cso)、倡议和社会运动之间的联系正在发生变化。过去的相互促进的盟友,经常在意识形态和个人方面相互渗透,如今彼此变得更加疏远。尽管如此,政党仍然寻求与公民社会组织和倡议建立关系。那些对职位期望不高的政党,比如极右翼和激进左翼,通过为政治活动提供较少的约束性和非正式机会,有可能满足公民对更多横向参与的要求。在实证层面上,本文重点关注波兰的两个政党:进步的左派团结(Lewica Razem)和极右翼的自由与独立联盟(Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość),以确定双方如何感知和纳入参与性要求。本研究采用基于对政党政治家个人深度访谈的定性分析,旨在比较来自政治光谱对立双方的政党对公民参与需求的诊断,以及他们对无党派政治活动家的供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信