Comparative Study of Pyridine and Pyrimidine Derivatives as Promising Anti-Inflammatory Agents: Design, Synthesis, and LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Macrophages

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Farid M. Sroor, Ahmed A. F. Soliman, Wagdy K. B. Khalil, Khaled Mahmoud
{"title":"Comparative Study of Pyridine and Pyrimidine Derivatives as Promising Anti-Inflammatory Agents: Design, Synthesis, and LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Macrophages","authors":"Farid M. Sroor,&nbsp;Ahmed A. F. Soliman,&nbsp;Wagdy K. B. Khalil,&nbsp;Khaled Mahmoud","doi":"10.1002/ddr.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this study, we aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives and evaluate their anti-inflammatory activity against RAW 264.7 macrophages. Using chalcones (<b>5a−f</b>) as suitable precursors, we disclosed a novel series of pyridine (<b>7a−f</b>) and pyrimidine (<b>9a−e</b>) derivatives via the reaction of <b>5a−f</b> with 2-cyanothioacetamide or guanidine hydrochloride, respectively. Both pyridines and pyrimidines were tested as anti-inflammatory agents to compare the difference in activity of the pyridine and pyrimidine scaffolds as part of a comparative study. With a percentage of live cells greater than 80%, the pyridines (<b>7a−f</b>) and pyrimidines (<b>9a−e</b>) were found to be safe for RAW cells. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory activity of these compounds was evaluated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW macrophages by performing nitric oxide (NO) assays. Among pyridines, <b>7a</b> and <b>7f</b> showed significant inhibition with 65.48% and 51.19%, with IC<sub>50</sub> values (IC<sub>50</sub> = 76.6 and 96.8 µM), respectively. The pyrimidine derivatives showed promising results as well, <b>9a</b> and <b>9d</b> ranking the best activity with 55.95% and 61.90%, respectively, and IC<sub>50</sub> values (IC<sub>50</sub> = 83.1 and 88.7 µM, respectively). The gene expression levels were assessed for the most promising compounds <b>7a</b> and <b>9d</b> using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis to measure the mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), nuclear factor kappa β (NF-kβ), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (INOS). The expression levels of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-<i>ɑ</i>, NF-kβ, and INOS genes were decreased significantly in RAW-treated cells with <b>7a</b> by 43%, 32%, 61%, 26%, and 53% respectively, compared with negative RAW cells. The expression levels of IL-1, IL-6, NF-k<i>β</i>, and INOS genes were decreased significantly in RAW-treated cells with <b>9d</b> by 71%, 48%, 61%, and 65%, respectively, compared with negative RAW cells. However, the expression levels of the TNF-ɑ gene were decreased without significant differences in RAW treated with <b>9d</b> by 83% (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) compared with negative RAW cells. These findings exhibited that <b>7a</b> was more effective compared with <b>9d</b> as an anti-inflammatory agent.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11291,"journal":{"name":"Drug Development Research","volume":"86 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddr.70146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of pyridine and pyrimidine derivatives and evaluate their anti-inflammatory activity against RAW 264.7 macrophages. Using chalcones (5a−f) as suitable precursors, we disclosed a novel series of pyridine (7a−f) and pyrimidine (9a−e) derivatives via the reaction of 5a−f with 2-cyanothioacetamide or guanidine hydrochloride, respectively. Both pyridines and pyrimidines were tested as anti-inflammatory agents to compare the difference in activity of the pyridine and pyrimidine scaffolds as part of a comparative study. With a percentage of live cells greater than 80%, the pyridines (7a−f) and pyrimidines (9a−e) were found to be safe for RAW cells. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory activity of these compounds was evaluated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW macrophages by performing nitric oxide (NO) assays. Among pyridines, 7a and 7f showed significant inhibition with 65.48% and 51.19%, with IC50 values (IC50 = 76.6 and 96.8 µM), respectively. The pyrimidine derivatives showed promising results as well, 9a and 9d ranking the best activity with 55.95% and 61.90%, respectively, and IC50 values (IC50 = 83.1 and 88.7 µM, respectively). The gene expression levels were assessed for the most promising compounds 7a and 9d using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis to measure the mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), nuclear factor kappa β (NF-kβ), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (INOS). The expression levels of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-ɑ, NF-kβ, and INOS genes were decreased significantly in RAW-treated cells with 7a by 43%, 32%, 61%, 26%, and 53% respectively, compared with negative RAW cells. The expression levels of IL-1, IL-6, NF-kβ, and INOS genes were decreased significantly in RAW-treated cells with 9d by 71%, 48%, 61%, and 65%, respectively, compared with negative RAW cells. However, the expression levels of the TNF-ɑ gene were decreased without significant differences in RAW treated with 9d by 83% (p > 0.05) compared with negative RAW cells. These findings exhibited that 7a was more effective compared with 9d as an anti-inflammatory agent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

吡啶和嘧啶衍生物作为抗炎药物的比较研究:设计、合成和lps诱导的RAW 264.7巨噬细胞
在这项研究中,我们旨在设计和合成一系列新的吡啶和嘧啶衍生物,并评估它们对RAW 264.7巨噬细胞的抗炎活性。以查尔酮(5a−f)为前体,通过5a−f与2-氰硫乙酰胺或盐酸胍的反应,我们发现了一系列新的吡啶(7a−f)和嘧啶(9a−e)衍生物。作为比较研究的一部分,我们对吡啶和嘧啶作为抗炎剂进行了测试,以比较吡啶和嘧啶支架活性的差异。当活细胞的百分比大于80%时,发现吡啶(7a−f)和嘧啶(9a−e)对RAW细胞是安全的。此外,通过进行一氧化氮(NO)测定,在脂多糖(LPS)刺激的RAW巨噬细胞中评估了这些化合物的抗炎活性。其中,7a和7f的抑制率分别为65.48%和51.19%,IC50值分别为76.6和96.8µM。其中,9a和9d活性最高,分别为55.95%和61.90%,IC50值分别为83.1和88.7µM。采用实时逆转录-聚合酶链式反应分析,评估最有希望的化合物7a和9d的基因表达水平,测量炎症因子的mRNA和蛋白表达水平,包括白细胞介素-1 (IL-1)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子- α (TNF- α)、核因子κ β (NF-kβ)和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(INOS)。与RAW阴性细胞相比,7a预处理的细胞中IL-1、IL-6、TNF- β、NF-kβ和INOS基因的表达水平分别下降43%、32%、61%、26%和53%。与未处理RAW的细胞相比,RAW处理9d的细胞中IL-1、IL-6、NF-kβ和INOS基因的表达水平分别下降了71%、48%、61%和65%。然而,与未处理RAW的细胞相比,9d处理的RAW细胞TNF- α基因表达水平降低了83%,但差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。这些发现表明7a作为抗炎剂比9d更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Development Research focuses on research topics related to the discovery and development of new therapeutic entities. The journal publishes original research articles on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, biotechnology and biopharmaceuticals, toxicology, and drug delivery, formulation, and pharmacokinetics. The journal welcomes manuscripts on new compounds and technologies in all areas focused on human therapeutics, as well as global management, health care policy, and regulatory issues involving the drug discovery and development process. In addition to full-length articles, Drug Development Research publishes Brief Reports on important and timely new research findings, as well as in-depth review articles. The journal also features periodic special thematic issues devoted to specific compound classes, new technologies, and broad aspects of drug discovery and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信