Data-efficient creativity evaluation in museum cultural creative products: a machine learning framework for data-driven decision-making in product development

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Hui Cheng , Bing-jian Liu , Xu Sun , Xiao Qiu
{"title":"Data-efficient creativity evaluation in museum cultural creative products: a machine learning framework for data-driven decision-making in product development","authors":"Hui Cheng ,&nbsp;Bing-jian Liu ,&nbsp;Xu Sun ,&nbsp;Xiao Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses a critical gap in the evaluation of Museum Cultural and Creative Products (MCCPs), where existing models, such as the Museum Product Creativity Measurement (MPCM) model, though effective, are often too complex and impractical for real-world application, especially when supporting data-driven decision-making in product development. The research investigates whether the MPCM model can be simplified without compromising its predictive accuracy and explores the most suitable machine learning algorithms for creativity prediction. The study consists of two phases and utilizes a comprehensive dataset containing 5,423 participants and 17,853 data points from four distinct sources. In the pilot phase, data were collected through online and offline surveys, resulting in the development of three models: the Expert Suggested Model, the Hybrid Opinion Model, and a Machine Learning Model. The in-depth phase involved evaluating five machine learning models—Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)—using statistical analysis, model validation, and cross-validation techniques. The RF model underwent four rounds of testing, consistently demonstrating superior performance compared to the MPCM model, especially in predicting creativity with smaller sample sizes (200–300), with average RMSE and MAE values of 0.127 and 0.111, respectively. It indicates a notable difference between consumer-rated and RF-predicted creativity. This research contributes to the theoretical advancement and practical streamlining of creativity evaluation frameworks, enhancing their applicability to MCCPs across diverse cultural contexts. Furthermore, it offers methodological insights into how data-driven approaches inform and enhance decision-making processes in product development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 129014"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425026314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in the evaluation of Museum Cultural and Creative Products (MCCPs), where existing models, such as the Museum Product Creativity Measurement (MPCM) model, though effective, are often too complex and impractical for real-world application, especially when supporting data-driven decision-making in product development. The research investigates whether the MPCM model can be simplified without compromising its predictive accuracy and explores the most suitable machine learning algorithms for creativity prediction. The study consists of two phases and utilizes a comprehensive dataset containing 5,423 participants and 17,853 data points from four distinct sources. In the pilot phase, data were collected through online and offline surveys, resulting in the development of three models: the Expert Suggested Model, the Hybrid Opinion Model, and a Machine Learning Model. The in-depth phase involved evaluating five machine learning models—Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)—using statistical analysis, model validation, and cross-validation techniques. The RF model underwent four rounds of testing, consistently demonstrating superior performance compared to the MPCM model, especially in predicting creativity with smaller sample sizes (200–300), with average RMSE and MAE values of 0.127 and 0.111, respectively. It indicates a notable difference between consumer-rated and RF-predicted creativity. This research contributes to the theoretical advancement and practical streamlining of creativity evaluation frameworks, enhancing their applicability to MCCPs across diverse cultural contexts. Furthermore, it offers methodological insights into how data-driven approaches inform and enhance decision-making processes in product development.
博物馆文化创意产品的数据高效创意评估:产品开发中数据驱动决策的机器学习框架
本研究解决了博物馆文化创意产品(mccp)评估中的一个关键空白,即现有模型,如博物馆产品创意测量(MPCM)模型,虽然有效,但对于实际应用来说往往过于复杂和不切实际,特别是在支持产品开发中数据驱动的决策时。该研究探讨了MPCM模型是否可以在不影响其预测准确性的情况下进行简化,并探索了最适合用于创造力预测的机器学习算法。该研究包括两个阶段,利用了一个包含5423名参与者和来自四个不同来源的17853个数据点的综合数据集。在试点阶段,通过在线和离线调查收集数据,从而开发出三种模型:专家建议模型、混合意见模型和机器学习模型。深入阶段包括使用统计分析、模型验证和交叉验证技术评估五种机器学习模型——随机森林(RF)、梯度增强决策树(GBDT)、轻梯度增强机(LightGBM)、支持向量回归(SVR)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)。RF模型经过四轮测试,始终表现出优于MPCM模型的性能,特别是在预测较小样本量(200-300)的创造力方面,平均RMSE和MAE值分别为0.127和0.111。这表明消费者评价的创造力和rf预测的创造力之间存在显著差异。本研究有助于创造力评估框架的理论发展和实践精简,增强其在不同文化背景下对mccp的适用性。此外,它还提供了关于数据驱动方法如何通知和增强产品开发决策过程的方法论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信