Wildfire and Postfire Restoration Treatments Have Lasting Effects on Rodent Habitat and Community Composition

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Savannah L. Bartel, Robert S. Arkle, David S. Pilliod
{"title":"Wildfire and Postfire Restoration Treatments Have Lasting Effects on Rodent Habitat and Community Composition","authors":"Savannah L. Bartel,&nbsp;Robert S. Arkle,&nbsp;David S. Pilliod","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rangeland fires can quickly change the structure of wildlife habitat and cause changes that persist for years to decades. To facilitate habitat recovery, postfire restoration actions often involve sowing seeds of native and nonnative perennial grasses and shrubs. Empirical information on whether such restoration activities are effective and how wildlife will respond is unknown. We evaluated the effects of wildfire and postfire seeding on rodent communities in sagebrush steppe by measuring environmental characteristics and live-trapping rodents at three wildfire locations in the northern Great Basin that burned 2–14 yr prior. Sampled plots were either 1) burned (control), 2) burned and seeded with nonnative species, 3) burned and seeded with native species, or 4) not burned (reference). Unburned reference plots had 95.7% more shrub cover and less cover of nonnative annual grasses than all burned plots. Burned plots seeded with native species had greater cover of native perennial grasses and less bare ground compared with burned plots seeded with nonnative species or control plots. Wildfire and postfire seeding significantly changed rodent community composition but not species richness. American deermouse (<em>Peromyscus maniculatus</em>) and least chipmunk (<em>Tamias minimus</em>) were less likely to occur in burned plots than in unburned reference plots. Ord’s kangaroo rat (<em>Dipodomys ordii</em>) and Piute ground squirrel (<em>Urocitellus mollis</em>) were more likely to occur in burned plots than in unburned reference plots. Sagebrush vole (<em>Lemmiscus curtatus</em>) was more likely to occur in burned plots with native seeding than with all other treatments. Species’ responses to wildfire and seeding reflected their relationships to cover of shrubs, perennial grasses, and nonnative annual grasses. These results suggest that wildfire and postfire seeding have long-lasting effects on wildlife communities. Landscape-level rodent diversity may be enhanced when small-scale disturbances or restoration actions increase landscape heterogeneity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"103 ","pages":"Pages 28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425000946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rangeland fires can quickly change the structure of wildlife habitat and cause changes that persist for years to decades. To facilitate habitat recovery, postfire restoration actions often involve sowing seeds of native and nonnative perennial grasses and shrubs. Empirical information on whether such restoration activities are effective and how wildlife will respond is unknown. We evaluated the effects of wildfire and postfire seeding on rodent communities in sagebrush steppe by measuring environmental characteristics and live-trapping rodents at three wildfire locations in the northern Great Basin that burned 2–14 yr prior. Sampled plots were either 1) burned (control), 2) burned and seeded with nonnative species, 3) burned and seeded with native species, or 4) not burned (reference). Unburned reference plots had 95.7% more shrub cover and less cover of nonnative annual grasses than all burned plots. Burned plots seeded with native species had greater cover of native perennial grasses and less bare ground compared with burned plots seeded with nonnative species or control plots. Wildfire and postfire seeding significantly changed rodent community composition but not species richness. American deermouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) and least chipmunk (Tamias minimus) were less likely to occur in burned plots than in unburned reference plots. Ord’s kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii) and Piute ground squirrel (Urocitellus mollis) were more likely to occur in burned plots than in unburned reference plots. Sagebrush vole (Lemmiscus curtatus) was more likely to occur in burned plots with native seeding than with all other treatments. Species’ responses to wildfire and seeding reflected their relationships to cover of shrubs, perennial grasses, and nonnative annual grasses. These results suggest that wildfire and postfire seeding have long-lasting effects on wildlife communities. Landscape-level rodent diversity may be enhanced when small-scale disturbances or restoration actions increase landscape heterogeneity.
野火和火灾后恢复处理对啮齿动物栖息地和群落组成的持久影响
牧场火灾可以迅速改变野生动物栖息地的结构,并导致持续数年至数十年的变化。为了促进栖息地的恢复,火灾后的恢复行动通常包括播种本地和非本地多年生草和灌木的种子。关于这种恢复活动是否有效以及野生动物将如何反应的经验信息尚不清楚。通过测量2-14年前大盆地北部三个野火地点的环境特征和捕获啮齿动物,我们评估了野火和火灾后播种对鼠类群落的影响。采样样地分为1)焚烧(对照)、2)焚烧后播种非本地物种、3)焚烧后播种本地物种和4)不焚烧(对照)。未烧毁参考样地的灌木盖度比所有烧毁样地高95.7%,而非本地一年生草盖度比所有烧毁样地低。与外源种和对照地相比,以本地种播种的烧毁样地的本地多年生牧草盖度更高,裸地较少。野火和火灾后播种对啮齿动物群落组成有显著影响,但对物种丰富度没有显著影响。美洲鹿鼠(Peromyscus maniculatus)和最小花栗鼠(Tamias minimus)在燃烧样地出现的可能性低于未燃烧样地。大袋鼠鼠(Dipodomys ordii)和普特地松鼠(Urocitellus mollis)在燃烧样地比未燃烧样地更容易发生。山楂田鼠(Lemmiscus curtatus)在烧地发生的几率高于其他处理。物种对野火和播种的响应反映了它们与灌木、多年生禾本科和外来一年生禾本科植被覆盖的关系。这些结果表明,野火和火灾后播种对野生动物群落有长期影响。当小规模干扰或恢复活动增加景观异质性时,景观级啮齿动物多样性可能会增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信