The effect of depression on the peak alpha frequency as a biomarker of pain sensitivity

Q2 Medicine
Mingge Shi , Luiza Bonfim Pacheco , Natalia Egorova-Brumley
{"title":"The effect of depression on the peak alpha frequency as a biomarker of pain sensitivity","authors":"Mingge Shi ,&nbsp;Luiza Bonfim Pacheco ,&nbsp;Natalia Egorova-Brumley","doi":"10.1016/j.ynpai.2025.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess how Peak Alpha Frequency (PAF) as a neurophysiological biomarker of pain sensitivity is influenced by conditions often comorbid with chronic pain, e.g., depression, and how methodological differences in deriving PAF, e.g., from Eyes-open (EO) vs. Eyes-closed (EC) EEG recordings affect this association.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 47 participants (70 % female) aged 18–51 years (<em>M</em> = 25.0, <em>SD</em> = 6.50). Among them, all participants underwent EO EEG recording but only a subset of 25 participants underwent both EO and EC recording. Depression (Patient Health Quotient – 9 M = 4.49, SD = 3.96) and sensitivity to heat pain were measured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In EO, Spearman correlations showed no significant PAF-pain relationship (p = 0.530) but a positive correlation with depression (ρ = 0.348, p = 0.019). In EC, no significant correlations emerged, though a trend (p = 0.052) suggested depression might moderate PAF-pain links. Notably, the EO-EC PAF difference negatively correlated with depression (ρ = −0.54, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PAF may be sensitive to depression, albeit in the opposite direction to pain, and therefore mask the association between PAF and pain in individuals with depression. Differences in EO vs. EC PAF, as well as the EO-EC difference warrant further study.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Depression affects PAF especially in the eyes-open recordings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52177,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Pain","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X25000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess how Peak Alpha Frequency (PAF) as a neurophysiological biomarker of pain sensitivity is influenced by conditions often comorbid with chronic pain, e.g., depression, and how methodological differences in deriving PAF, e.g., from Eyes-open (EO) vs. Eyes-closed (EC) EEG recordings affect this association.

Methods

We analyzed data from 47 participants (70 % female) aged 18–51 years (M = 25.0, SD = 6.50). Among them, all participants underwent EO EEG recording but only a subset of 25 participants underwent both EO and EC recording. Depression (Patient Health Quotient – 9 M = 4.49, SD = 3.96) and sensitivity to heat pain were measured.

Results

In EO, Spearman correlations showed no significant PAF-pain relationship (p = 0.530) but a positive correlation with depression (ρ = 0.348, p = 0.019). In EC, no significant correlations emerged, though a trend (p = 0.052) suggested depression might moderate PAF-pain links. Notably, the EO-EC PAF difference negatively correlated with depression (ρ = −0.54, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

PAF may be sensitive to depression, albeit in the opposite direction to pain, and therefore mask the association between PAF and pain in individuals with depression. Differences in EO vs. EC PAF, as well as the EO-EC difference warrant further study.

Significance

Depression affects PAF especially in the eyes-open recordings.
抑郁对作为疼痛敏感性生物标志物的α峰频率的影响
目的评估阿尔法峰频率(PAF)作为疼痛敏感性的神经生理生物标志物如何受到慢性疼痛共病(如抑郁症)的影响,以及从睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)脑电图记录中提取PAF的方法差异如何影响这种关联。方法对47例18 ~ 51岁(M = 25.0, SD = 6.50)参与者的资料进行分析,其中女性占70%。其中,所有参与者均进行了EO EEG记录,但只有25名参与者同时进行了EO和EC记录。抑郁(患者健康商- 9 M = 4.49, SD = 3.96)和对热痛的敏感性。结果在EO中,Spearman相关性显示paf与疼痛无显著相关性(p = 0.530),与抑郁呈正相关(ρ = 0.348, p = 0.019)。在EC中,没有显著的相关性出现,尽管趋势(p = 0.052)表明抑郁可能会缓和paf -疼痛的联系。EO-EC PAF差异与抑郁呈负相关(ρ = - 0.54, p <;0.01)。结论PAF可能对抑郁敏感,但与疼痛敏感方向相反,因此掩盖了抑郁症患者PAF与疼痛的关系。EO与EC的PAF差异,以及EO-EC的差异值得进一步研究。抑郁症影响PAF,特别是在睁眼记录中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Pain
Neurobiology of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信