Reading the comments: An exploratory quantitative analysis of YouTube comments in response to abortion plotlines on fictional television programs

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stephanie Herold , Piper Narendorf , Beth Hoffman
{"title":"Reading the comments: An exploratory quantitative analysis of YouTube comments in response to abortion plotlines on fictional television programs","authors":"Stephanie Herold ,&nbsp;Piper Narendorf ,&nbsp;Beth Hoffman","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Previous research has found that exposure to abortion plotlines on fictional television programs may influence viewers’ knowledge about abortion, and that examining comments under health-related YouTube videos provides insight into discourse around the health topics. We conducted an exploratory quantitative content analysis of YouTube video clips from television abortion plotlines and comments.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We identified YouTube clips posted in a five-year period (2018–2023) on official network accounts that depicted abortion plotlines. Two research assistants independently coded the top 20 comments and associated replies for each video using a systematically developed codebook. We calculated descriptive statistics and used chi-square tests to assess for differences in the distribution of content code by sentiment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 275 abortion plotlines in our sample period, we identified 25 YouTube videos that met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen of these clips had more than 10 relevant comments, for a total of 619 relevant comments. Slightly less than half (43.8 %) expressed abortion positive sentiment, 22.0 % expressed abortion restrictive sentiment, and 19 % expressed complex sentiment. The most frequent content category was <em>arguing with another poster</em> (41.2 %,) followed by <em>hostility toward another poster</em> (16.2 %). <em>Potential misinformation</em> was present in 10.4 % of comments; these were significantly more likely to express abortion restrictive sentiment compared to abortion positive or complex sentiment (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results of this exploratory study suggest that YouTube comments posted under abortion plotline videos express a mix of sentiment, and social media data may offer a unique opportunity for researchers to investigate viewers’ reactions to these plotlines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575625000734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Previous research has found that exposure to abortion plotlines on fictional television programs may influence viewers’ knowledge about abortion, and that examining comments under health-related YouTube videos provides insight into discourse around the health topics. We conducted an exploratory quantitative content analysis of YouTube video clips from television abortion plotlines and comments.

Study Design

We identified YouTube clips posted in a five-year period (2018–2023) on official network accounts that depicted abortion plotlines. Two research assistants independently coded the top 20 comments and associated replies for each video using a systematically developed codebook. We calculated descriptive statistics and used chi-square tests to assess for differences in the distribution of content code by sentiment.

Results

Of the 275 abortion plotlines in our sample period, we identified 25 YouTube videos that met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen of these clips had more than 10 relevant comments, for a total of 619 relevant comments. Slightly less than half (43.8 %) expressed abortion positive sentiment, 22.0 % expressed abortion restrictive sentiment, and 19 % expressed complex sentiment. The most frequent content category was arguing with another poster (41.2 %,) followed by hostility toward another poster (16.2 %). Potential misinformation was present in 10.4 % of comments; these were significantly more likely to express abortion restrictive sentiment compared to abortion positive or complex sentiment (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Results of this exploratory study suggest that YouTube comments posted under abortion plotline videos express a mix of sentiment, and social media data may offer a unique opportunity for researchers to investigate viewers’ reactions to these plotlines.
阅读评论:对YouTube评论对虚构电视节目中堕胎情节的回应进行探索性定量分析
先前的研究发现,在虚构的电视节目中看到堕胎的情节可能会影响观众对堕胎的了解,而检查与健康相关的YouTube视频下的评论可以洞察围绕健康话题的话语。我们对YouTube视频片段中的电视堕胎情节和评论进行了探索性的定量内容分析。研究设计我们确定了在官方网络账户上发布的五年间(2018-2023年)描述堕胎情节的YouTube片段。两名研究助理使用系统开发的代码本,对每个视频的前20条评论和相关回复进行独立编码。我们计算了描述性统计数据,并使用卡方检验来评估情感内容代码分布的差异。在我们的样本期内的275个堕胎情节中,我们确定了25个YouTube视频符合我们的纳入标准。其中15个视频的相关评论超过10条,总共有619条相关评论。略少于一半(43.8%)的人表示堕胎是积极的,22.0%的人表示堕胎是限制的,19%的人表示堕胎是复杂的。最常见的内容类别是与另一位发帖者争吵(41.2%),其次是对另一位发帖者的敌意(16.2%)。10.4%的评论中存在潜在的错误信息;与堕胎积极或复杂的情绪相比,这些人更有可能表达堕胎限制情绪(p <;0.001)。这项探索性研究的结果表明,YouTube上关于堕胎情节视频的评论表达了各种各样的情绪,社交媒体数据可能为研究人员提供了一个独特的机会来调查观众对这些情节的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信