The influence of antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation on the microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery: A pilot study

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Undine Gabriele Lange , Konrad Lehr , René Thieme , Albrecht Hoffmeister , Jürgen Feisthammel , Ines Gockel , Alexander Link , Boris Jansen-Winkeln
{"title":"The influence of antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation on the microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery: A pilot study","authors":"Undine Gabriele Lange ,&nbsp;Konrad Lehr ,&nbsp;René Thieme ,&nbsp;Albrecht Hoffmeister ,&nbsp;Jürgen Feisthammel ,&nbsp;Ines Gockel ,&nbsp;Alexander Link ,&nbsp;Boris Jansen-Winkeln","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backround</h3><div>The extent to which bowel preparation mechanical (MBP) or oral antibiotic (OA) or in combination (MBP/OA)) should be performed prior to elective colorectal surgery is the subject of ongoing debate. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of MPB/OA [with single-shot intravenous antibiotic administration before incision (MPB/OA+ivAB)] on the microbiome of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) operated minimally-invasive.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We were studying 16 consecutive patients who underwent elective resection surgery for CRC at our centre in a prospective panel study. MBP was performed and 1 g parmomomycin/500 mg metronidazole was administered orally one day preoperatively; 1 g ertapenem was administered intravenously 30 min prior incision. Three mucosal samples were taken preoperatively during colonoscopy and intraoperatively and analysed by 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before MPB/OA+ivOA, the genera <em>Phocaeicola</em> (10 %), <em>Bacteroides</em> (7 %) and <em>unclassified Ruminococcaceae</em> (6 %) were predominant. After preparation, all bacteria were reduced except <em>Enterococcus</em> (7 %) and <em>Escherichia/Shigella</em> (6 %), which had increased. Significant reductions were seen for <em>Bacteroides</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.01), <em>Haemophilus</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.047), <em>Holdemanella</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.004), <em>Neisseria</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.004), <em>Odoribacter</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.027), <em>unclassified Clostridiales</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.008) and <em>unclassified Ruminococcacaeae</em> (<em>p</em> = 0.009). Large effect sizes (Cohens’d) were seen for <em>Bacteroidetes</em> (<em>d</em> = 0.864) and <em>unclassified Ruminococcacaeae</em> (<em>d</em> = 0.909).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our pilot study, we observed a significant reduction in seven bacterial genera after MBP/OA+ivAB in patients with CRC. Some of these bacterial genera have been associated with anastomotic insufficiency. Further, large in-depth analyses are needed to evaluate perioperative microbial drift with postoperative complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262025000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backround

The extent to which bowel preparation mechanical (MBP) or oral antibiotic (OA) or in combination (MBP/OA)) should be performed prior to elective colorectal surgery is the subject of ongoing debate. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of MPB/OA [with single-shot intravenous antibiotic administration before incision (MPB/OA+ivAB)] on the microbiome of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) operated minimally-invasive.

Methods

We were studying 16 consecutive patients who underwent elective resection surgery for CRC at our centre in a prospective panel study. MBP was performed and 1 g parmomomycin/500 mg metronidazole was administered orally one day preoperatively; 1 g ertapenem was administered intravenously 30 min prior incision. Three mucosal samples were taken preoperatively during colonoscopy and intraoperatively and analysed by 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing.

Results

Before MPB/OA+ivOA, the genera Phocaeicola (10 %), Bacteroides (7 %) and unclassified Ruminococcaceae (6 %) were predominant. After preparation, all bacteria were reduced except Enterococcus (7 %) and Escherichia/Shigella (6 %), which had increased. Significant reductions were seen for Bacteroides (p = 0.01), Haemophilus (p = 0.047), Holdemanella (p = 0.004), Neisseria (p = 0.004), Odoribacter (p = 0.027), unclassified Clostridiales (p = 0.008) and unclassified Ruminococcacaeae (p = 0.009). Large effect sizes (Cohens’d) were seen for Bacteroidetes (d = 0.864) and unclassified Ruminococcacaeae (d = 0.909).

Conclusions

In our pilot study, we observed a significant reduction in seven bacterial genera after MBP/OA+ivAB in patients with CRC. Some of these bacterial genera have been associated with anastomotic insufficiency. Further, large in-depth analyses are needed to evaluate perioperative microbial drift with postoperative complications.
抗生素和机械肠道准备对结直肠癌手术中微生物组的影响:一项初步研究
在选择性结直肠手术前,肠准备机械(MBP)或口服抗生素(OA)或联合(MBP/OA)的应用程度是一个持续争论的主题。我们的研究目的是探讨MPB/OA[切口前单次静脉给药(MPB/OA+ivAB)]对微创结直肠癌(CRC)手术患者微生物组的影响。方法:我们在一项前瞻性小组研究中研究了16例连续在本中心接受选择性结直肠癌切除手术的患者。行MBP,术前1天口服帕莫霉素1 g /甲硝唑500 mg;切开前30分钟静脉滴注格拉他培南1 g。术前及术中取3例粘膜标本,采用16S rRNA V1-V2基因测序分析。结果MPB/OA+ivOA前以Phocaeicola属(10%)、Bacteroides属(7%)和未分类Ruminococcaceae属(6%)为主。制备后,除肠球菌(7%)和埃希菌/志贺氏菌(6%)增加外,其余细菌均减少。Bacteroides (p = 0.01)、Haemophilus (p = 0.047)、Holdemanella (p = 0.004)、Neisseria (p = 0.004)、Odoribacter (p = 0.027)、Clostridiales (p = 0.008)和Ruminococcacaeae (p = 0.009)的感染率均有显著降低。拟杆菌门(d = 0.864)和未分类的Ruminococcacaeae (d = 0.909)的效应值较大(Cohens 'd)。在我们的初步研究中,我们观察到MBP/OA+ivAB治疗结直肠癌患者后,7种细菌属显著减少。其中一些细菌属与吻合口功能不全有关。此外,需要大量深入的分析来评估围手术期微生物漂移与术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信