Geolocation tracking to monitor spatial distribution and habitat selection of cows, horses and sheep grazing in mountainous areas

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Roger Vidal-Cardos, Emma Fàbrega, Antoni Dalmau
{"title":"Geolocation tracking to monitor spatial distribution and habitat selection of cows, horses and sheep grazing in mountainous areas","authors":"Roger Vidal-Cardos,&nbsp;Emma Fàbrega,&nbsp;Antoni Dalmau","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies offer an opportunity to monitor livestock, enhancing farmers’ decision-making for improved control, better animal performance, and reduced environmental impact through proper management of pasture areas. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of data provided by commercial geolocation collars, along with open data resources such as information on natural habitats, topography, and vegetation, to detect grazing preferences of mountain livestock. We monitored 240 animals from three different herds and species (140 cows, 50 horses, and 50 sheep) during the grazing season (6 months) using geolocation collars in the Alt Pirineu Natural Park (80,000 ha), located in Catalonia, Spain. Animal distributions were analysed spatially and temporally across different seasonal periods (Spring: May-Jun, Summer: Jul-Aug and Autumn: Sep-Oct). Geolocation data were used to assess livestock preferences and avoidances regarding different types of terrain, land cover, and vegetation, estimated using Jacob’s selection index (JSI), a metric indicating whether animals use a particular area more or less than expected based on its availability. Additionally, we examined the influence of these environmental factors and the distance to water sources on animal distribution, and we identified high-density grazing hotspots. Results indicated that cows and horses positively selected areas with lower altitudes (JSI = 0.29 and 0.17, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and gentler slopes (JSI = 0.38 and 0.22, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas sheep preferred higher altitudes (JSI = 0.10, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Only cows showed a preference for areas with bare or dispersed vegetation. In general, all three species selected land covers such as open forests, meadows, wetlands, and water points, but changed depending on the season and species. The distance to water was greater for cows and sheep, particularly during the summer, whereas only horses showed a strong dependence on proximity to water sources. Finally, we identified and compared high-density grazing hotspots among the three species. These findings reveal not only interesting heterogeneity in distribution patterns among species sharing the same area, but also clear seasonal differences. In conclusion, data automatically collected from geolocation collars demonstrate strong potential for studying livestock grazing preferences, particularly in remote or hard-to-access mountainous areas. This information improves our understanding of livestock-environment interactions without requiring physical presence and can be effectively applied to support extensive grazing management.</div></div><div><h3>Simple summary</h3><div>Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies, such as geolocation collars, help farmers monitor animals more effectively and manage pastures sustainably. In this study, we tracked 240 animals (cows, horses, and sheep) in a mountainous natural park in Catalonia, Spain, over six months. Using geolocation data combined with information about the landscape, we analysed where and when different species preferred to graze. We found that cows and horses tend to use lower, gentler areas, while sheep prefer higher ground. All species avoid dense forests, favouring open habitats like meadows and wetlands, with seasonal and vegetation-based variations in preference. Horses stay closer to water sources due to their fibrous diet, while cows and sheep showed less dependence on water proximity. Riparian zones and fens, though highly attractive to large grazers, are ecologically sensitive and require careful management, such as selective fencing. Sheep was the most diet selective, with horses being the least. These insights suggest that tailored grazing strategies, such as species rotation, habitat-based planning, and multi-species-grazing, can optimize pasture use while protecting fragile ecosystems. These insights highlight how geolocation tracking can improve livestock management in remote mountain areas, helping farmers make better decisions and improving conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies offer an opportunity to monitor livestock, enhancing farmers’ decision-making for improved control, better animal performance, and reduced environmental impact through proper management of pasture areas. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of data provided by commercial geolocation collars, along with open data resources such as information on natural habitats, topography, and vegetation, to detect grazing preferences of mountain livestock. We monitored 240 animals from three different herds and species (140 cows, 50 horses, and 50 sheep) during the grazing season (6 months) using geolocation collars in the Alt Pirineu Natural Park (80,000 ha), located in Catalonia, Spain. Animal distributions were analysed spatially and temporally across different seasonal periods (Spring: May-Jun, Summer: Jul-Aug and Autumn: Sep-Oct). Geolocation data were used to assess livestock preferences and avoidances regarding different types of terrain, land cover, and vegetation, estimated using Jacob’s selection index (JSI), a metric indicating whether animals use a particular area more or less than expected based on its availability. Additionally, we examined the influence of these environmental factors and the distance to water sources on animal distribution, and we identified high-density grazing hotspots. Results indicated that cows and horses positively selected areas with lower altitudes (JSI = 0.29 and 0.17, p < 0.05) and gentler slopes (JSI = 0.38 and 0.22, p < 0.05), whereas sheep preferred higher altitudes (JSI = 0.10, p < 0.05). Only cows showed a preference for areas with bare or dispersed vegetation. In general, all three species selected land covers such as open forests, meadows, wetlands, and water points, but changed depending on the season and species. The distance to water was greater for cows and sheep, particularly during the summer, whereas only horses showed a strong dependence on proximity to water sources. Finally, we identified and compared high-density grazing hotspots among the three species. These findings reveal not only interesting heterogeneity in distribution patterns among species sharing the same area, but also clear seasonal differences. In conclusion, data automatically collected from geolocation collars demonstrate strong potential for studying livestock grazing preferences, particularly in remote or hard-to-access mountainous areas. This information improves our understanding of livestock-environment interactions without requiring physical presence and can be effectively applied to support extensive grazing management.

Simple summary

Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies, such as geolocation collars, help farmers monitor animals more effectively and manage pastures sustainably. In this study, we tracked 240 animals (cows, horses, and sheep) in a mountainous natural park in Catalonia, Spain, over six months. Using geolocation data combined with information about the landscape, we analysed where and when different species preferred to graze. We found that cows and horses tend to use lower, gentler areas, while sheep prefer higher ground. All species avoid dense forests, favouring open habitats like meadows and wetlands, with seasonal and vegetation-based variations in preference. Horses stay closer to water sources due to their fibrous diet, while cows and sheep showed less dependence on water proximity. Riparian zones and fens, though highly attractive to large grazers, are ecologically sensitive and require careful management, such as selective fencing. Sheep was the most diet selective, with horses being the least. These insights suggest that tailored grazing strategies, such as species rotation, habitat-based planning, and multi-species-grazing, can optimize pasture use while protecting fragile ecosystems. These insights highlight how geolocation tracking can improve livestock management in remote mountain areas, helping farmers make better decisions and improving conservation.
利用地理定位跟踪技术监测山区放牧牛、马、羊的空间分布和生境选择
精准畜牧业(PLF)技术提供了监测牲畜的机会,通过对牧场的适当管理,加强农民的决策,以改进控制,提高动物生产性能,减少对环境的影响。本研究的目的是评估商业地理定位项圈提供的数据以及开放数据资源(如自然栖息地、地形和植被信息)在检测山地牲畜放牧偏好方面的潜力。在放牧季节(6个月),我们在位于西班牙加泰罗尼亚的Alt Pirineu自然公园(80,000 ha)使用地理定位圈监测了来自3个不同畜群和物种(140头牛、50匹马和50只羊)的240只动物。不同季节(春季:5 - 6月,夏季:7 - 8月,秋季:9 - 10月)动物分布的时空分析。地理位置数据用于评估牲畜对不同类型地形、土地覆盖和植被的偏好和回避,使用雅各布选择指数(JSI)来估计,这是一种指标,表明动物根据其可用性对特定区域的使用是否比预期的多或少。此外,我们还研究了这些环境因素和与水源的距离对动物分布的影响,并确定了高密度放牧热点。结果表明,牛和马积极选择海拔较低的地区(JSI = 0.29和0.17,p <; 0.05)和坡度较缓的地区(JSI = 0.38和0.22,p <; 0.05),而羊则倾向于海拔较高的地区(JSI = 0.10, p <; 0.05)。只有牛对光秃秃或植被分散的地区表现出偏好。一般来说,这三种物种都选择了开阔的森林、草地、湿地和水点等土地覆盖,但随季节和物种的不同而变化。牛和羊离水的距离更大,特别是在夏天,而只有马对靠近水源表现出强烈的依赖。最后,我们对3个物种的高密度放牧热点进行了识别和比较。这些发现不仅揭示了在同一地区物种之间分布模式的有趣异质性,而且还揭示了明显的季节差异。总之,从地理定位项圈中自动收集的数据显示了研究牲畜放牧偏好的巨大潜力,特别是在偏远或难以进入的山区。这些信息提高了我们对牲畜与环境相互作用的理解,而不需要实际存在,并且可以有效地应用于支持广泛的放牧管理。精确畜牧业(PLF)技术,如地理定位项圈,可以帮助农民更有效地监测动物并可持续地管理牧场。在这项研究中,我们在西班牙加泰罗尼亚的一个山区自然公园里追踪了240只动物(牛、马和羊),历时6个月。利用地理位置数据结合景观信息,我们分析了不同物种喜欢在何时何地吃草。我们发现牛和马倾向于使用较低、较温和的地方,而羊更喜欢高地。所有物种都避开茂密的森林,喜欢草地和湿地等开放栖息地,偏好随季节和植被而变化。马因其纤维性饮食而更靠近水源,而牛和羊对水源的依赖程度较低。河岸地带和沼泽虽然对大型食草动物很有吸引力,但对生态很敏感,需要精心管理,比如选择性围栏。绵羊是最挑剔饮食的,马是最不挑剔的。这些见解表明,量身定制的放牧策略,如物种轮作、基于栖息地的规划和多物种放牧,可以优化牧场利用,同时保护脆弱的生态系统。这些见解突出了地理位置跟踪如何改善偏远山区的牲畜管理,帮助农民做出更好的决策并改善保护工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信