Anjan Tibrewala MD, MS , Duc Thinh Pham MD , Mo Hu MS , Lucia C. Petito PhD , Jonathan D. Rich MD , Finn Gustafsson MD, PhD , Theo M.M.H. de By MBA, PhD , Kevin Veen MD, PhD , Donald M. Lloyd-Jones MD, ScM , Sanjiv J. Shah MD
{"title":"Risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices","authors":"Anjan Tibrewala MD, MS , Duc Thinh Pham MD , Mo Hu MS , Lucia C. Petito PhD , Jonathan D. Rich MD , Finn Gustafsson MD, PhD , Theo M.M.H. de By MBA, PhD , Kevin Veen MD, PhD , Donald M. Lloyd-Jones MD, ScM , Sanjiv J. Shah MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients.
Methods
Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated.
Results
The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts.
Conclusions
We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.