Measuring the general public artificial intelligence attitudes and literacy: Measurement scales validation by national multistage omnibus survey in Bulgaria

Ekaterina Markova, Gabriela Yordanova
{"title":"Measuring the general public artificial intelligence attitudes and literacy: Measurement scales validation by national multistage omnibus survey in Bulgaria","authors":"Ekaterina Markova,&nbsp;Gabriela Yordanova","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines public attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and self-perceived AI literacy in Bulgaria, using two validated instruments: the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS). Administered within a national multistage omnibus survey (N = 1006), the study represents the first large-scale assessment of AI-related perceptions in an Eastern European context. The research has a dual focus: to test the psychometric performance of both scales in a new linguistic and methodological setting, and to explore how AI attitudes and literacy are distributed across key sociodemographic groups. Both GAAIS and MAILS demonstrate strong internal consistency in the face-to-face survey setting, supporting their applicability beyond online convenience samples. ANOVA and regression analyses reveal that education and age are significant predictors of AI literacy, while positive AI attitudes also vary by gender. In contrast, negative attitudes appear more evenly distributed, reflecting broader societal concerns. The results confirm the conceptual distinction between attitudes and perceived literacy, and demonstrate the benefit of administering the two instruments in parallel. The study offers a multidimensional approach to measuring public AI readiness and contributes a validated framework for future cross-cultural and policy-oriented research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines public attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and self-perceived AI literacy in Bulgaria, using two validated instruments: the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS). Administered within a national multistage omnibus survey (N = 1006), the study represents the first large-scale assessment of AI-related perceptions in an Eastern European context. The research has a dual focus: to test the psychometric performance of both scales in a new linguistic and methodological setting, and to explore how AI attitudes and literacy are distributed across key sociodemographic groups. Both GAAIS and MAILS demonstrate strong internal consistency in the face-to-face survey setting, supporting their applicability beyond online convenience samples. ANOVA and regression analyses reveal that education and age are significant predictors of AI literacy, while positive AI attitudes also vary by gender. In contrast, negative attitudes appear more evenly distributed, reflecting broader societal concerns. The results confirm the conceptual distinction between attitudes and perceived literacy, and demonstrate the benefit of administering the two instruments in parallel. The study offers a multidimensional approach to measuring public AI readiness and contributes a validated framework for future cross-cultural and policy-oriented research.
测量公众对人工智能的态度和素养:保加利亚国家多阶段综合调查的测量量表验证
本研究调查了保加利亚公众对人工智能(AI)的态度和自我感知的人工智能素养,使用了两种经过验证的工具:对人工智能的一般态度量表(GAAIS)和元人工智能素养量表(mail)。在一项全国多阶段综合调查(N = 1006)中,该研究代表了在东欧背景下对人工智能相关认知的第一次大规模评估。这项研究有两个重点:在新的语言和方法环境中测试这两个量表的心理测量表现,并探索人工智能的态度和读写能力如何在关键的社会人口群体中分布。GAAIS和邮件在面对面调查设置中都表现出很强的内部一致性,支持它们在在线便利样本之外的适用性。方差分析和回归分析显示,教育程度和年龄是人工智能素养的重要预测因素,而对人工智能的积极态度也因性别而异。相反,消极态度似乎分布更均匀,反映了更广泛的社会问题。结果证实了态度和感知识字之间的概念区别,并证明了并行管理这两种工具的好处。该研究提供了一种多维度的方法来衡量公众对人工智能的准备程度,并为未来的跨文化和政策导向研究提供了一个有效的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信