Associations between exercise patterns and health outcomes in sedentary and non-sedentary individuals: a longitudinal population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-08-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001745
Mayssam Nehme, David De Ridder, Gabriel Kathari, Hélène Baysson, Stephanie Schrempft, Aminata Bouhet, Julien Lamour, María-Eugenia Zaballa, Stephane Joost, Silvia Stringhini, Idris Guessous
{"title":"Associations between exercise patterns and health outcomes in sedentary and non-sedentary individuals: a longitudinal population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland.","authors":"Mayssam Nehme, David De Ridder, Gabriel Kathari, Hélène Baysson, Stephanie Schrempft, Aminata Bouhet, Julien Lamour, María-Eugenia Zaballa, Stephane Joost, Silvia Stringhini, Idris Guessous","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are significant modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases, yet their prevalence remains high despite their well-established negative impact on health. This study evaluates regular moderate exercise compared with intermittent vigorous exercise, and their associations with self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality among sedentary and non-sedentary individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the Specchio population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland, completed yearly follow-ups between 2021 and 2024. Baseline information included self-reported physical activity levels and frequency, health and socioeconomic determinants. Follow-ups included information on general self-rated health, new health events, mental health and sleep quality.Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between exercise level at baseline (2021) and subsequent outcomes (2021-2024) including general self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality in the overall sample and stratified by sedentary status. Linear regression with fitted models was done by exercise level between 2021 and 2024 for general self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, n=5720 participants were included, mean age was 51.2 years. A third of participants reported sedentary behaviour, more likely in young professionals, men, smokers and individuals living with a partner and kids. Older and retired individuals exhibited less sedentary behaviour. Individuals who engaged in intermittent vigorous exercise had higher scores for self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality compared with regular moderate exercise and partial to no exercise. Intermittent vigorous exercise was a determinant for better self-rated health (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.43 (1.18-1.72)) and better mental health (aOR 1.77 (1.47-2.13)). Intermittent vigorous activity remained associated with favourable health outcomes including self-rated health aOR 1.25 (1.03-1.52) and mental health aOR 1.39 (1.17-1.66) in sedentary individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intermittent vigorous exercise could be a good option that primary care physicians can recommend especially for young professionals with a busy schedule and increasing sedentary behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are significant modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases, yet their prevalence remains high despite their well-established negative impact on health. This study evaluates regular moderate exercise compared with intermittent vigorous exercise, and their associations with self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality among sedentary and non-sedentary individuals.

Methods: Participants from the Specchio population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland, completed yearly follow-ups between 2021 and 2024. Baseline information included self-reported physical activity levels and frequency, health and socioeconomic determinants. Follow-ups included information on general self-rated health, new health events, mental health and sleep quality.Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between exercise level at baseline (2021) and subsequent outcomes (2021-2024) including general self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality in the overall sample and stratified by sedentary status. Linear regression with fitted models was done by exercise level between 2021 and 2024 for general self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality.

Results: Overall, n=5720 participants were included, mean age was 51.2 years. A third of participants reported sedentary behaviour, more likely in young professionals, men, smokers and individuals living with a partner and kids. Older and retired individuals exhibited less sedentary behaviour. Individuals who engaged in intermittent vigorous exercise had higher scores for self-rated health, mental health and sleep quality compared with regular moderate exercise and partial to no exercise. Intermittent vigorous exercise was a determinant for better self-rated health (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.43 (1.18-1.72)) and better mental health (aOR 1.77 (1.47-2.13)). Intermittent vigorous activity remained associated with favourable health outcomes including self-rated health aOR 1.25 (1.03-1.52) and mental health aOR 1.39 (1.17-1.66) in sedentary individuals.

Conclusion: Intermittent vigorous exercise could be a good option that primary care physicians can recommend especially for young professionals with a busy schedule and increasing sedentary behaviour.

久坐和不久坐人群的运动模式与健康结果之间的关系:瑞士日内瓦的一项纵向人群研究
引言:缺乏身体活动和久坐行为是慢性病的可改变的重要危险因素,尽管它们对健康的负面影响已得到证实,但其患病率仍然很高。这项研究评估了定期适度运动与间歇性剧烈运动的比较,以及它们与久坐和不久坐个体的自评健康、心理健康和睡眠质量的关系。方法:来自瑞士日内瓦Specchio人群研究的参与者在2021年至2024年间完成了每年的随访。基线信息包括自我报告的身体活动水平和频率、健康和社会经济决定因素。后续调查包括一般自我评估健康、新的健康事件、心理健康和睡眠质量的信息。使用逻辑回归模型评估基线(2021年)运动水平与随后结果(2021-2024年)之间的关系,包括总体样本的总体自评健康、心理健康和睡眠质量,并按久坐状态分层。根据2021年至2024年间的运动水平,对一般自评健康、心理健康和睡眠质量进行了线性回归。结果:总共纳入n=5720名参与者,平均年龄为51.2岁。三分之一的参与者报告说他们有久坐不动的行为,更有可能是年轻的专业人士、男性、吸烟者和有伴侣和孩子的人。老年人和退休人员的久坐行为较少。与定期适度运动和部分不运动的人相比,进行间歇性剧烈运动的人在自我评估健康、心理健康和睡眠质量方面得分更高。间歇性剧烈运动是改善自我评价健康(调整后的OR (aOR) 1.43(1.18-1.72))和改善心理健康(aOR 1.77(1.47-2.13))的决定因素。间歇性剧烈运动仍然与良好的健康结果相关,包括久坐个体的自评健康aOR为1.25(1.03-1.52)和心理健康aOR为1.39(1.17-1.66)。结论:间歇性剧烈运动可能是初级保健医生推荐的一个很好的选择,特别是对于那些日程繁忙、久坐不动的年轻专业人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信