Shared Understanding Between Parents and Clinicians Regarding Developmental Screening and Referrals.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Lindsay Schlichte-Seaberg, Sitaram Vangala, Lorena Porras-Javier, Lindsey R Thompson, Paul J Chung, Bergen Nelson, Rebecca Dudovitz
{"title":"Shared Understanding Between Parents and Clinicians Regarding Developmental Screening and Referrals.","authors":"Lindsay Schlichte-Seaberg, Sitaram Vangala, Lorena Porras-Javier, Lindsey R Thompson, Paul J Chung, Bergen Nelson, Rebecca Dudovitz","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of shared understanding between parents and clinicians regarding developmental concerns and referrals during well-child care (WCC) may hinder early intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate discrepancies between clinicians' and parents' recall of developmental concerns and referrals, and to identify factors associated with discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from the Achieving My Potential (AMP) study. English and Spanish-speaking families with children aged 12-42 months were recruited from community clinics. Data included demographics, developmental assessments, parental post-WCC surveys, and medical record abstractions. Two discrepancy types (concern and referral) were identified. Discrepancy frequencies were calculated, and logistic regressions examined characteristics associated with discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 512 enrolled families, there were 94 (18%) concern discrepancies, of which 78% were concerns reported as discussed in parent surveys but not in the medical record. There were 43 (8%) referral discrepancies, of which 63% were referrals reported as made in the medical record but not in parent surveys. Children at moderate developmental risk had greater odds of concern (aOR 1.37; p < 0.05) and referral (aOR 2.65; p < 0.001) discrepancies. Parents' having at least a high school education was associated with lower odds of concern (aOR 0.59; p < 0.05) and referral (AOR 0.34, p < 0.001) discrepancies. Older parental age and higher family-centered care scores were associated with lower odds of referral discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discrepant understanding may arise from miscommunication, misinterpretations, recall, or documentation practices. Attention to shared understanding, particularly among families at high risk for discrepancies, may support early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lack of shared understanding between parents and clinicians regarding developmental concerns and referrals during well-child care (WCC) may hinder early intervention.

Objective: To investigate discrepancies between clinicians' and parents' recall of developmental concerns and referrals, and to identify factors associated with discrepancies.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from the Achieving My Potential (AMP) study. English and Spanish-speaking families with children aged 12-42 months were recruited from community clinics. Data included demographics, developmental assessments, parental post-WCC surveys, and medical record abstractions. Two discrepancy types (concern and referral) were identified. Discrepancy frequencies were calculated, and logistic regressions examined characteristics associated with discrepancies.

Results: Among 512 enrolled families, there were 94 (18%) concern discrepancies, of which 78% were concerns reported as discussed in parent surveys but not in the medical record. There were 43 (8%) referral discrepancies, of which 63% were referrals reported as made in the medical record but not in parent surveys. Children at moderate developmental risk had greater odds of concern (aOR 1.37; p < 0.05) and referral (aOR 2.65; p < 0.001) discrepancies. Parents' having at least a high school education was associated with lower odds of concern (aOR 0.59; p < 0.05) and referral (AOR 0.34, p < 0.001) discrepancies. Older parental age and higher family-centered care scores were associated with lower odds of referral discrepancies.

Conclusions: Discrepant understanding may arise from miscommunication, misinterpretations, recall, or documentation practices. Attention to shared understanding, particularly among families at high risk for discrepancies, may support early intervention.

家长和临床医生对发育筛查和转诊的共同理解。
背景:在儿童保育(WCC)期间,父母和临床医生之间缺乏关于发育问题和转诊的共同理解可能会阻碍早期干预。目的:探讨临床医生和家长对发育问题和转诊情况的回忆差异,并找出差异的相关因素。方法:这是对实现我的潜力(AMP)研究数据的二次分析。从社区诊所招募有12-42个月孩子的英语和西班牙语家庭。数据包括人口统计、发育评估、父母wcc后调查和医疗记录摘要。确定了两种差异类型(关注和转诊)。计算差异频率,并用逻辑回归检验与差异相关的特征。结果:在512个登记的家庭中,有94个(18%)存在担忧差异,其中78%的担忧报告在家长调查中讨论过,但在病历中没有。有43例(8%)转诊差异,其中63%的转诊报告是在医疗记录中进行的,而不是在父母调查中进行的。中等发育风险的儿童有更大的关注几率(aOR 1.37;p < 0.05)和转诊(aOR 2.65;P < 0.001)差异。父母至少受过高中教育与较低的担忧几率相关(aOR 0.59;p < 0.05)和转诊差异(AOR 0.34, p < 0.001)。父母年龄越大,以家庭为中心的护理得分越高,转诊差异的几率越低。结论:不一致的理解可能由误解、误解、回忆或文献实践引起。关注共同的理解,特别是在存在差异高风险的家庭中,可能有助于早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信