Jina Li, Congyu Yin, Man Ye, Lu Kang, Jie Zhu, Lingzhi Huang
{"title":"Psychological Distress in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients: Trajectories, Influencing Factors and Impacts on Quality of Life.","authors":"Jina Li, Congyu Yin, Man Ye, Lu Kang, Jie Zhu, Lingzhi Huang","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate psychological distress trajectories in surgical lung cancer patients and their influencing factors, and explore the impact of trajectories on quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 324 patients at a Chinese tertiary hospital were collected within 48 h of admission (T0), 3 days after surgery (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 1 year after discharge (T5). Latent class growth models identified psychological distress trajectories, logistic regression analysed their influencing factors, and linear regression analysed the effects of psychological distress trajectories on QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological distress peaked at T1, then decreased steadily. Three trajectories emerged: low-level stable group (Class 1, 45.06%), intermediate-level decreased group (Class 2, 39.51%) and high-level stable group (Class 3, 15.43%). Compared with Class 1, Class 3 was predicted by surgical modality, lymph node metastasis, postoperative adjuvant therapy, symptom burden, anxiety and self-efficacy, while Class 2 was predicted by surgical modality, postoperative adjuvant therapy and self-efficacy. Furthermore, psychological distress trajectories negatively predicted QoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical lung cancer patients experience an initial increase in psychological distress, followed by a gradual decline, with three distinct trajectories. Surgical modality, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative adjuvant therapy, symptom burden, anxiety and self-efficacy were the major influencing factors of psychological distress trajectories. Persistent distress adversely impacts QoL, underscoring the need for early, personalised psychological interventions to improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To investigate psychological distress trajectories in surgical lung cancer patients and their influencing factors, and explore the impact of trajectories on quality of life (QoL).
Design: Prospective longitudinal study.
Methods: Data from 324 patients at a Chinese tertiary hospital were collected within 48 h of admission (T0), 3 days after surgery (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 1 year after discharge (T5). Latent class growth models identified psychological distress trajectories, logistic regression analysed their influencing factors, and linear regression analysed the effects of psychological distress trajectories on QoL.
Results: Psychological distress peaked at T1, then decreased steadily. Three trajectories emerged: low-level stable group (Class 1, 45.06%), intermediate-level decreased group (Class 2, 39.51%) and high-level stable group (Class 3, 15.43%). Compared with Class 1, Class 3 was predicted by surgical modality, lymph node metastasis, postoperative adjuvant therapy, symptom burden, anxiety and self-efficacy, while Class 2 was predicted by surgical modality, postoperative adjuvant therapy and self-efficacy. Furthermore, psychological distress trajectories negatively predicted QoL.
Conclusions: Surgical lung cancer patients experience an initial increase in psychological distress, followed by a gradual decline, with three distinct trajectories. Surgical modality, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative adjuvant therapy, symptom burden, anxiety and self-efficacy were the major influencing factors of psychological distress trajectories. Persistent distress adversely impacts QoL, underscoring the need for early, personalised psychological interventions to improve long-term outcomes.
目的:了解外科肺癌患者的心理困扰轨迹及其影响因素,探讨其对生活质量的影响。设计:前瞻性纵向研究。方法:收集国内某三级医院324例患者入院48 h (T0)、术后3 d (T1)、2周(T2)、3个月(T3)、6个月(T4)、出院1年(T5)的资料。潜在类别增长模型识别心理困扰轨迹,逻辑回归分析其影响因素,线性回归分析心理困扰轨迹对生活质量的影响。结果:心理困扰在T1时达到高峰,随后逐渐下降。出现了低水平稳定组(第1类,45.06%)、中等水平下降组(第2类,39.51%)和高水平稳定组(第3类,15.43%)三个轨迹。与1类相比,3类通过手术方式、淋巴结转移、术后辅助治疗、症状负担、焦虑和自我效能感进行预测,2类通过手术方式、术后辅助治疗和自我效能感进行预测。此外,心理困扰轨迹负向预测生活质量。结论:手术肺癌患者的心理困扰在初始阶段增加,随后逐渐下降,有三个明显的轨迹。手术方式、淋巴结转移、术后辅助治疗、症状负担、焦虑和自我效能是影响心理困扰轨迹的主要因素。持续的痛苦会对生活质量产生不利影响,因此需要进行早期、个性化的心理干预,以改善长期结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.