Induction of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tristen L Hall, Douglas H Fernald, Vivian Jiang, Kristen Curcija, Joseph W LeMaster, John M Westfall, Donald E Nease, Linda Zittleman
{"title":"Induction of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.","authors":"Tristen L Hall, Douglas H Fernald, Vivian Jiang, Kristen Curcija, Joseph W LeMaster, John M Westfall, Donald E Nease, Linda Zittleman","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240317R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overdoses and deaths from synthetic opioids grew sharply in the past decade. Most people with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive recommended evidence-based treatment: nationally, 72% to 87% of people who need OUD treatment do not receive medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Little is known about practice teams' experiences with home, office, and telehealth induction for MOUD, particularly in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with primary care clinicians and staff from February through September 2023 to understand experiences providing MOUD via home, office, and telehealth induction. Interviews were part of a PCORI-funded trial, Home versus Office versus telehealth for Medication Enhanced Recovery (HOMER). We used template and editing coding styles to categorize text according to deductive codes derived from research questions and inductive codes derived from multiple readings of transcripts. We used immersion-crystallization to iteratively review coded text and identify interview themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight clinicians and staff from 21 US primary care practices participated in interviews. Home induction is increasingly common and preferred by patients and practice teams, social determinants of health affect induction and maintenance in treatment, clinicians and staff use honest communication to build trusting relationships with patients, practices identified patients as MOUD candidates through word-of-mouth and referrals, and an evolving OUD landscape are causing practices to adapt their care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care practices are committed to offering MOUD. Findings offer insights about the challenges facing primary care practices in their efforts to deliver MOUD to address a rapidly evolving opioid epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"539-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240317R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overdoses and deaths from synthetic opioids grew sharply in the past decade. Most people with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive recommended evidence-based treatment: nationally, 72% to 87% of people who need OUD treatment do not receive medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Little is known about practice teams' experiences with home, office, and telehealth induction for MOUD, particularly in primary care.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with primary care clinicians and staff from February through September 2023 to understand experiences providing MOUD via home, office, and telehealth induction. Interviews were part of a PCORI-funded trial, Home versus Office versus telehealth for Medication Enhanced Recovery (HOMER). We used template and editing coding styles to categorize text according to deductive codes derived from research questions and inductive codes derived from multiple readings of transcripts. We used immersion-crystallization to iteratively review coded text and identify interview themes.

Results: Thirty-eight clinicians and staff from 21 US primary care practices participated in interviews. Home induction is increasingly common and preferred by patients and practice teams, social determinants of health affect induction and maintenance in treatment, clinicians and staff use honest communication to build trusting relationships with patients, practices identified patients as MOUD candidates through word-of-mouth and referrals, and an evolving OUD landscape are causing practices to adapt their care.

Conclusion: Primary care practices are committed to offering MOUD. Findings offer insights about the challenges facing primary care practices in their efforts to deliver MOUD to address a rapidly evolving opioid epidemic.

初级保健中阿片类药物使用障碍的诱导用药。
背景:合成阿片类药物过量和死亡在过去十年中急剧增长。大多数阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者没有接受推荐的循证治疗:在全国范围内,72%至87%需要阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的患者没有接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗。实践团队对家庭、办公室和远程医疗诱导mod的经验知之甚少,特别是在初级保健方面。方法:我们于2023年2月至9月对初级保健临床医生和工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,以了解通过家庭、办公室和远程医疗诱导提供mod的经验。访谈是pcori资助的一项试验的一部分,家庭与办公室与远程医疗的药物促进康复(HOMER)。我们使用模板和编辑编码风格,根据从研究问题中得到的演绎代码和从多次阅读文本中得到的归纳代码对文本进行分类。我们使用浸没结晶法迭代审查编码文本并确定采访主题。结果:来自21个美国初级保健实践的38名临床医生和工作人员参加了访谈。家庭诱导越来越普遍,并且受到患者和实践团队的青睐,健康的社会决定因素影响治疗的诱导和维持,临床医生和工作人员使用诚实的沟通与患者建立信任关系,实践通过口口相传和转诊确定患者为OUD候选人,以及不断变化的OUD环境正在促使实践调整其护理。结论:初级保健实践致力于提供mod。研究结果提供了关于初级保健实践在努力提供mod以应对快速发展的阿片类药物流行方面面临的挑战的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信