Continuity of Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Examining Patient-Provider Relationships and Patient Centered Medical Home Recognition.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jodi Simon, Jeffrey Panzer, Abbey Ekong, David T Liss, Christine A Sinsky, Katherine M Wright
{"title":"Continuity of Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Examining Patient-Provider Relationships and Patient Centered Medical Home Recognition.","authors":"Jodi Simon, Jeffrey Panzer, Abbey Ekong, David T Liss, Christine A Sinsky, Katherine M Wright","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240365R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuity of care between patients and physicians is a defining element of primary care and a pillar of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) program. We aimed to investigate the level of short- and long-term continuity within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and the relationship of continuity to PCMH recognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-method study utilized Electronic Health Record data to investigate patient continuity, and survey data to investigate PCMH history. The study population included patients with at least 2 visits between 2008 and 2023 to one of 18 FQHCs. Continuity was measured by calculating the number of primary care providers (PCPs) seen by the patient and the usual provider of care index (UPC Index [the number of visits with the most frequent PCP/total visits]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our population consisted of 1,323,547 patients and 19,768,516 encounters. The mean (SD) number of PCPs per patient over one year was 2.01 (1.1). For patients who had visits spanning at least 5 years, the mean was 7.2 (4.7). The mean one-year UPC was .72 (.25) and 5+ year UPC was .47 (.21). No meaningful association was found between continuity measures and PCMH recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show, on average, high numbers of PCPs and poor continuity with a single \"usual provider of care\" for each patient's care over time at FQHCs. Leveraging performance measures, such as PCMH recognition, to incentivize continuity may be inadequate. Different approaches should be considered to preserve the long-term continuity at the heart of primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"490-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240365R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Continuity of care between patients and physicians is a defining element of primary care and a pillar of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) program. We aimed to investigate the level of short- and long-term continuity within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and the relationship of continuity to PCMH recognition.

Methods: This multi-method study utilized Electronic Health Record data to investigate patient continuity, and survey data to investigate PCMH history. The study population included patients with at least 2 visits between 2008 and 2023 to one of 18 FQHCs. Continuity was measured by calculating the number of primary care providers (PCPs) seen by the patient and the usual provider of care index (UPC Index [the number of visits with the most frequent PCP/total visits]).

Results: Our population consisted of 1,323,547 patients and 19,768,516 encounters. The mean (SD) number of PCPs per patient over one year was 2.01 (1.1). For patients who had visits spanning at least 5 years, the mean was 7.2 (4.7). The mean one-year UPC was .72 (.25) and 5+ year UPC was .47 (.21). No meaningful association was found between continuity measures and PCMH recognition.

Conclusions: These findings show, on average, high numbers of PCPs and poor continuity with a single "usual provider of care" for each patient's care over time at FQHCs. Leveraging performance measures, such as PCMH recognition, to incentivize continuity may be inadequate. Different approaches should be considered to preserve the long-term continuity at the heart of primary care.

联邦合格医疗中心的护理连续性:检查患者-提供者关系和以患者为中心的医疗家庭认可。
目的:患者和医生之间的连续性护理是初级保健的一个决定性因素,也是以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)计划的支柱。我们的目的是调查联邦合格医疗中心(fqhc)网络内的短期和长期连续性水平,以及连续性与PCMH认可的关系。方法:本研究采用多种方法,利用电子病历资料调查患者连续性,并利用调查资料调查PCMH病史。研究人群包括在2008年至2023年间至少两次到18个fqhc之一就诊的患者。通过计算患者就诊的初级保健提供者(PCP)的数量和通常的护理提供者指数(UPC指数[就诊次数最多的PCP/总就诊次数])来衡量连续性。结果:我们的人群包括1,323,547名患者和19,768,516次接触。每位患者一年内pcp的平均(SD)数为2.01(1.1)。对于就诊时间超过5年的患者,平均为7.2(4.7)。平均1年UPC为0.72(0.25),5年以上UPC为0.47(0.21)。连续性措施与PCMH识别之间没有发现有意义的关联。结论:这些发现表明,平均而言,在fqhc中,pcp的数量很高,并且每个患者的护理都有一个单一的“常规提供者”,这种连续性很差。利用绩效指标(如PCMH认可)来激励连续性可能是不够的。应考虑采取不同的方法,以保持初级保健核心的长期连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信