Impact of smoking on the effectiveness of different non-small-cell lung cancer therapies.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2025-07-30 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2025-145
Kairui Yang
{"title":"Impact of smoking on the effectiveness of different non-small-cell lung cancer therapies.","authors":"Kairui Yang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2025-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Smoking reshapes tumor genetics, host immunity, and drug metabolism in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet its therapy-specific impact is often overlooked. This review sought to clarify how current, former, and never smokers respond to each major NSCLC modality and to outline opportunities for treatment optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to April 2025 identified 146 high-quality trials, cohorts, and meta-analyses that reported outcomes by smoking status. Hazard ratios, response rates, and complication data, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Immune-checkpoint inhibitors improved overall survival across all smoking groups (pooled HR_OS =0.74), although active smokers exhibited shorter response durability because of faster drug clearance and persistent immune dysfunction despite higher tumor-mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Never-smokers achieved markedly better progression-free survival with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32 <i>vs.</i> 0.54 in smokers], whereas ALK inhibitors showed little disparity. Smoking attenuated chemotherapy and radiotherapy benefits through cytochrome-P450 induction, tumor hypoxia, and enhanced DNA repair, and it increased postoperative pulmonary-complication rates two- to five-fold after lung resection; cessation ≥8 weeks reduced but did not eliminate this surgical risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking status is a potent, modifiable determinant of NSCLC outcomes. Embedding structured cessation programs, tailoring dose or schedule, and incorporating smoking-informed molecular profiling into routine care could heighten efficacy and reduce toxicity. Future trials should stratify participants by detailed tobacco history to advance truly personalized, behavior-integrated oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"14 7","pages":"4461-4473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2025-145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Smoking reshapes tumor genetics, host immunity, and drug metabolism in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet its therapy-specific impact is often overlooked. This review sought to clarify how current, former, and never smokers respond to each major NSCLC modality and to outline opportunities for treatment optimization.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to April 2025 identified 146 high-quality trials, cohorts, and meta-analyses that reported outcomes by smoking status. Hazard ratios, response rates, and complication data, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Key content and findings: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors improved overall survival across all smoking groups (pooled HR_OS =0.74), although active smokers exhibited shorter response durability because of faster drug clearance and persistent immune dysfunction despite higher tumor-mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Never-smokers achieved markedly better progression-free survival with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32 vs. 0.54 in smokers], whereas ALK inhibitors showed little disparity. Smoking attenuated chemotherapy and radiotherapy benefits through cytochrome-P450 induction, tumor hypoxia, and enhanced DNA repair, and it increased postoperative pulmonary-complication rates two- to five-fold after lung resection; cessation ≥8 weeks reduced but did not eliminate this surgical risk.

Conclusions: Smoking status is a potent, modifiable determinant of NSCLC outcomes. Embedding structured cessation programs, tailoring dose or schedule, and incorporating smoking-informed molecular profiling into routine care could heighten efficacy and reduce toxicity. Future trials should stratify participants by detailed tobacco history to advance truly personalized, behavior-integrated oncology.

吸烟对不同非小细胞肺癌治疗效果的影响。
背景和目的:吸烟重塑非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的肿瘤遗传学、宿主免疫和药物代谢,但其治疗特异性影响往往被忽视。本综述旨在阐明当前吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者对每种主要非小细胞肺癌治疗方式的反应,并概述优化治疗的机会。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,截至2025年4月,确定了146项高质量的试验、队列和荟萃分析,这些试验、队列和荟萃分析报告了吸烟状况的结果。进行了风险比、有效率、并发症数据和随机效应荟萃分析。关键内容和发现:免疫检查点抑制剂提高了所有吸烟组的总生存率(HR_OS =0.74),尽管活跃吸烟者表现出较短的反应持久性,因为更快的药物清除和持续的免疫功能障碍,尽管更高的肿瘤突变负担和程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达。从不吸烟者使用EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂获得明显更好的无进展生存[危险比(HR) 0.32 vs.吸烟者0.54],而ALK抑制剂几乎没有差异。吸烟通过细胞色素p450诱导、肿瘤缺氧和增强DNA修复减弱化疗和放疗的益处,并使肺切除术后的术后肺部并发症发生率增加2至5倍;戒烟≥8周降低但未消除手术风险。结论:吸烟状况是影响非小细胞肺癌预后的一个有效的、可改变的决定因素。嵌入结构化的戒烟计划,调整剂量或时间表,并将吸烟信息分子分析纳入常规护理可以提高疗效并减少毒性。未来的试验应该根据详细的吸烟史对参与者进行分层,以推进真正的个性化、行为整合肿瘤学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信