Updating the position of fluoxetine: Editorial shift or evidence-based evolution?

Q3 Medicine
Georgios Mikellides, Olympia Evagorou, Marianna Tantele
{"title":"Updating the position of fluoxetine: Editorial shift or evidence-based evolution?","authors":"Georgios Mikellides, Olympia Evagorou, Marianna Tantele","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2025.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To the Editors, The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry have long been regarded as a cornerstone of psychopharmacological practice internationally. In the recently published 15th edition (2025), a notable shift in the positioning of fluoxetine is observed, particularly regarding its use during pregnancy. Fluoxetine is no longer presented as a first-line option without the inclusion of new robust evidence to justify this downgrading.1 Historically, fluoxetine has been recognized as a first-line SSRI due to its well-established efficacy, favorable tolerability, long half-life protecting against withdrawal symptoms, and safer profile in overdose compared to older antidepressants.3,4 In the 15th edition, it is stated that \"an association between prenatal SSRI use and congenital heart defects has been reported, with some studies suggesting a higher risk with fluoxetine and paroxetine\".1 The only relevant citation is Reefhuis et al (2015),5 which employed Bayesian analysis to reevaluate previous associations. Although a slight increase in risk for specific congenital anomalies (e.g., right ventricular outflow tract obstruction) was identified, the study concludes that the absolute risks are small and that most SSRIs, including fluoxetine, are not significantly associated with specific birth defects. It is important to highlight that this study was already available at the time of the 14th edition (2021),2 where fluoxetine continued to be considered an appropriate and safe choice during pregnancy. This raises concerns about whether the change in tone in the 15th edition reflects genuine new scientific developments or simply evolving clinical preferences. Moreover, current NICE guidelines6,7 do favor sertraline due to a slightly lower observed risk in pregnancy. However, they also emphasize that women benefiting from an existing SSRI treatment should not be advised to switch medications solely because of pregnancy. Notably, fluoxetine remains the only SSRI officially approved for treating moderate to severe depression in adolescents aged 8-18 years.8 While adapting guidelines to evolving prescribing practices is understandable, in authoritative references such as the Maudsley Guidelines, it is crucial to clearly distinguish between evidence-based updates and pragmatic clinical trends. Failure to do so may inadvertently undermine confidence in long-standing, evidence-supported treatments like fluoxetine, ultimately affecting clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2025.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editors, The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry have long been regarded as a cornerstone of psychopharmacological practice internationally. In the recently published 15th edition (2025), a notable shift in the positioning of fluoxetine is observed, particularly regarding its use during pregnancy. Fluoxetine is no longer presented as a first-line option without the inclusion of new robust evidence to justify this downgrading.1 Historically, fluoxetine has been recognized as a first-line SSRI due to its well-established efficacy, favorable tolerability, long half-life protecting against withdrawal symptoms, and safer profile in overdose compared to older antidepressants.3,4 In the 15th edition, it is stated that "an association between prenatal SSRI use and congenital heart defects has been reported, with some studies suggesting a higher risk with fluoxetine and paroxetine".1 The only relevant citation is Reefhuis et al (2015),5 which employed Bayesian analysis to reevaluate previous associations. Although a slight increase in risk for specific congenital anomalies (e.g., right ventricular outflow tract obstruction) was identified, the study concludes that the absolute risks are small and that most SSRIs, including fluoxetine, are not significantly associated with specific birth defects. It is important to highlight that this study was already available at the time of the 14th edition (2021),2 where fluoxetine continued to be considered an appropriate and safe choice during pregnancy. This raises concerns about whether the change in tone in the 15th edition reflects genuine new scientific developments or simply evolving clinical preferences. Moreover, current NICE guidelines6,7 do favor sertraline due to a slightly lower observed risk in pregnancy. However, they also emphasize that women benefiting from an existing SSRI treatment should not be advised to switch medications solely because of pregnancy. Notably, fluoxetine remains the only SSRI officially approved for treating moderate to severe depression in adolescents aged 8-18 years.8 While adapting guidelines to evolving prescribing practices is understandable, in authoritative references such as the Maudsley Guidelines, it is crucial to clearly distinguish between evidence-based updates and pragmatic clinical trends. Failure to do so may inadvertently undermine confidence in long-standing, evidence-supported treatments like fluoxetine, ultimately affecting clinical decision-making.

更新氟西汀的立场:编辑转变还是循证进化?
致编辑们,《精神病学莫兹利处方指南》长期以来一直被视为国际精神药理学实践的基石。在最近出版的第15版(2025年)中,氟西汀的定位发生了显著变化,特别是在怀孕期间使用氟西汀方面。如果没有新的有力证据证明这一降级是合理的,氟西汀将不再作为一线选择从历史上看,氟西汀被认为是一线SSRI,因为它具有良好的疗效、良好的耐受性、较长的半衰期,可以防止戒断症状,并且与较老的抗抑郁药相比,过量服用时更安全。3,4在第15版中,它指出“产前使用SSRI与先天性心脏缺陷之间存在关联,一些研究表明氟西汀和帕罗西汀的风险更高”唯一相关的引用是Reefhuis等人(2015)5,他们使用贝叶斯分析重新评估了之前的关联。虽然确定了特定先天性异常(如右心室流出道梗阻)的风险略有增加,但研究得出的结论是,绝对风险很小,而且大多数ssri类药物,包括氟西汀,与特定出生缺陷没有显著相关性。必须强调的是,这项研究在第14版(2021年)时已经完成,当时氟西汀仍然被认为是怀孕期间适当和安全的选择。这引起了人们的关注,即第15版的语气变化是否反映了真正的新的科学发展,还是仅仅反映了不断变化的临床偏好。此外,由于观察到舍曲林在妊娠期的危险性稍低,目前的NICE指南6,7确实支持使用舍曲林。然而,他们也强调,从现有SSRI治疗中获益的女性不应该仅仅因为怀孕而被建议转换药物。值得注意的是,氟西汀仍然是唯一一种官方批准用于治疗8-18岁青少年中度至重度抑郁症的SSRI虽然调整指南以适应不断发展的处方实践是可以理解的,但在权威参考文献中,如莫兹利指南,明确区分基于证据的更新和实用的临床趋势是至关重要的。如果做不到这一点,可能会在不经意间破坏人们对氟西汀等长期有证据支持的治疗方法的信心,最终影响临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信