Similar cost-better results: the case of the hybrid Assertive Community Treatment model of care for severely mentally ill patients in rural Greece.

Q3 Medicine
Fotini Tsoli, Ioanna Athina Botsari, Nefeli Menti, Panagiota Kontoudi, Aikaterini Pouliasi, Vaios Peritogiannis
{"title":"Similar cost-better results: the case of the hybrid Assertive Community Treatment model of care for severely mentally ill patients in rural Greece.","authors":"Fotini Tsoli, Ioanna Athina Botsari, Nefeli Menti, Panagiota Kontoudi, Aikaterini Pouliasi, Vaios Peritogiannis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2025.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study evaluated the impact of a hybrid Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care on the direct medical costs of treating severe mental illness (SMI) patients in rural Greece. The study aimed to determine whether this model resulted in significant cost differences compared to usual treatment while also assessing its cost-effectiveness based on clinical improvements. A total of 23 patients with SMI and multiple hospitalizations were followed up for 16 months under the hybrid ACT model. Direct medical costs were estimated using previously published Greek data on schizophrenia treatment costs. Cost differences before and after the implementation of the hybrid ACT model were calculated, and cost-effectiveness was assessed using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), which reflects the cost per unit increase in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. There was no statistically significant difference in direct medical costs between usual care (310,029€) and hybrid ACT care (313,896€), with a small cost increase of 3,867€ (p = 0.077). However, hybrid ACT care significantly reduced hospitalizations and length of inpatient stay, leading to an 86.9% reduction in total inpatient days. Clinical improvements were also observed, with GAF scores increasing from 40.43 to 47.26. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a particularly low ICER of 25.9€ per GAF point gained, suggesting a cost-efficient intervention. In an alternative scenario, the 2024 pricing was estimated with the use of the Consumer Price Index. In this case, the hybrid ACT care appeared to be significantly cost-saving by 25.5%. A rough estimation of indirect costs revealed further cost savings in favor of the hybrid ACT. The hybrid ACT model proved to be cost-effective due to its strong impact on reducing inpatient care and improving patient functioning. These findings align with international studies demonstrating the economic and clinical benefits of community-based mental health care. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter studies to confirm cost-effectiveness and explore the impact on indirect costs, such as caregiver burden and law enforcement involvement. The results support further investment in hybrid ACT services in rural Greece to enhance mental health care delivery in low-resourced settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2025.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study evaluated the impact of a hybrid Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care on the direct medical costs of treating severe mental illness (SMI) patients in rural Greece. The study aimed to determine whether this model resulted in significant cost differences compared to usual treatment while also assessing its cost-effectiveness based on clinical improvements. A total of 23 patients with SMI and multiple hospitalizations were followed up for 16 months under the hybrid ACT model. Direct medical costs were estimated using previously published Greek data on schizophrenia treatment costs. Cost differences before and after the implementation of the hybrid ACT model were calculated, and cost-effectiveness was assessed using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), which reflects the cost per unit increase in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. There was no statistically significant difference in direct medical costs between usual care (310,029€) and hybrid ACT care (313,896€), with a small cost increase of 3,867€ (p = 0.077). However, hybrid ACT care significantly reduced hospitalizations and length of inpatient stay, leading to an 86.9% reduction in total inpatient days. Clinical improvements were also observed, with GAF scores increasing from 40.43 to 47.26. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a particularly low ICER of 25.9€ per GAF point gained, suggesting a cost-efficient intervention. In an alternative scenario, the 2024 pricing was estimated with the use of the Consumer Price Index. In this case, the hybrid ACT care appeared to be significantly cost-saving by 25.5%. A rough estimation of indirect costs revealed further cost savings in favor of the hybrid ACT. The hybrid ACT model proved to be cost-effective due to its strong impact on reducing inpatient care and improving patient functioning. These findings align with international studies demonstrating the economic and clinical benefits of community-based mental health care. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter studies to confirm cost-effectiveness and explore the impact on indirect costs, such as caregiver burden and law enforcement involvement. The results support further investment in hybrid ACT services in rural Greece to enhance mental health care delivery in low-resourced settings.

类似的成本效益更好的结果:在希腊农村,对严重精神疾病患者的混合自信社区治疗模式护理的案例。
本研究评估了混合自信社区治疗(ACT)模式对治疗希腊农村严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的直接医疗费用的影响。该研究旨在确定该模型与常规治疗相比是否会产生显着的成本差异,同时根据临床改善评估其成本效益。在混合ACT模式下,共对23例重度精神障碍和多次住院的患者进行了16个月的随访。直接医疗费用是根据希腊先前公布的精神分裂症治疗费用数据估计的。计算实施混合ACT模型前后的成本差异,并使用增量成本-效果比(ICER)评估成本-效果,该比率反映了全球功能评估(GAF)评分中单位增加的成本。常规护理(310,029欧元)和混合ACT护理(313,896欧元)之间的直接医疗费用无统计学差异,费用增加了3,867欧元(p = 0.077)。然而,混合ACT护理显著减少了住院次数和住院时间,导致住院总天数减少了86.9%。临床也有改善,GAF评分从40.43提高到47.26。成本效益分析表明,每获得GAF点的ICER为25.9欧元,这表明该干预措施具有成本效益。在另一种情况下,使用消费者价格指数来估计2024年的价格。在这种情况下,混合ACT护理似乎显着节省了25.5%的费用。对间接成本的粗略估计显示,混合ACT将进一步节省成本。混合ACT模式被证明具有成本效益,因为它对减少住院治疗和改善患者功能有很大的影响。这些发现与国际研究一致,证明了社区精神卫生保健的经济和临床效益。未来的研究应该集中在更大的、多中心的研究上,以确认成本效益,并探索对间接成本的影响,如照顾者负担和执法参与。研究结果支持进一步投资希腊农村地区的混合ACT服务,以加强资源匮乏地区的精神卫生保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信