Stayin' Alive: Examining Gender-Based Differences in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1017/S1049023X25101295
Abagayle E Bierowski, Julie A Calabrese, Patrice J Baptista, Paul C Comber, Alexander Kuc, Aman Shah, Gerard Carroll
{"title":"Stayin' Alive: Examining Gender-Based Differences in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Abagayle E Bierowski, Julie A Calabrese, Patrice J Baptista, Paul C Comber, Alexander Kuc, Aman Shah, Gerard Carroll","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X25101295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many factors influence the likelihood of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but gender disparities in prehospital care remain under-examined, particularly in relation to the bystander's connection to the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between gender and the likelihood of receiving BCPR in OHCA. The primary outcome of the study was to examine differences in BCPR rates among men and women who experienced OHCA. The secondary outcome was to investigate whether bystanders were more likely to provide CPR based on their relationship to the victim, comparing \"true\" layperson CPR to CPR administered by family members or friends and how these rates differed between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective prehospital chart review included all encounters from a single urban Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency with a cardiac arrest prior to EMS arrival from January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2022 (n = 701). For each encounter, the presence or absence of BCPR was recorded, along with the relation of the bystander to the patient. \"True\" BCPR was defined as CPR performed by a layperson unknown to the patient. Patients were excluded if they exhibited signs of obvious death, were physically inaccessible to bystanders, had CPR initiated by trained facility staff or police, had a do not resuscitate (DNR) order present on EMS arrival, received CPR but were not in cardiac arrest, or were younger than 18 years old (n = 174). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate data, with statistical significance defined at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study examined 701 cardiac arrest encounters: 250 female (35.7%) and 451 male (64.3%). Overall, men (n = 123; 27.3%) were more likely to receive BCPR than women (n = 48; 19.2%); OR = 1.58; 95%CI, 1.08-2.30; P = .02. Among those who received BCPR, women were significantly more likely to have received it from someone they knew (83.3% versus 65.9%; OR = 2.59; 95%CI, 1.11-6.04; P = .03) while men were more likely to receive \"true\" layperson BCPR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies significant gender disparities in prehospital BCPR and highlights an association between the bystander's relationship to the patient and the likelihood of intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X25101295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many factors influence the likelihood of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but gender disparities in prehospital care remain under-examined, particularly in relation to the bystander's connection to the patient.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between gender and the likelihood of receiving BCPR in OHCA. The primary outcome of the study was to examine differences in BCPR rates among men and women who experienced OHCA. The secondary outcome was to investigate whether bystanders were more likely to provide CPR based on their relationship to the victim, comparing "true" layperson CPR to CPR administered by family members or friends and how these rates differed between men and women.

Methods: This retrospective prehospital chart review included all encounters from a single urban Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency with a cardiac arrest prior to EMS arrival from January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2022 (n = 701). For each encounter, the presence or absence of BCPR was recorded, along with the relation of the bystander to the patient. "True" BCPR was defined as CPR performed by a layperson unknown to the patient. Patients were excluded if they exhibited signs of obvious death, were physically inaccessible to bystanders, had CPR initiated by trained facility staff or police, had a do not resuscitate (DNR) order present on EMS arrival, received CPR but were not in cardiac arrest, or were younger than 18 years old (n = 174). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate data, with statistical significance defined at P < .05.

Results: The study examined 701 cardiac arrest encounters: 250 female (35.7%) and 451 male (64.3%). Overall, men (n = 123; 27.3%) were more likely to receive BCPR than women (n = 48; 19.2%); OR = 1.58; 95%CI, 1.08-2.30; P = .02. Among those who received BCPR, women were significantly more likely to have received it from someone they knew (83.3% versus 65.9%; OR = 2.59; 95%CI, 1.11-6.04; P = .03) while men were more likely to receive "true" layperson BCPR.

Conclusions: This study identifies significant gender disparities in prehospital BCPR and highlights an association between the bystander's relationship to the patient and the likelihood of intervention.

保持活力:检查院外心脏骤停旁观者心肺复苏的性别差异。
许多因素影响院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)的可能性,但院前护理中的性别差异仍未得到充分研究,特别是与旁观者与患者的联系有关。目的:本研究的目的是评估性别与OHCA患者接受BCPR的可能性之间的关系。该研究的主要结果是检查经历过OHCA的男性和女性BCPR发生率的差异。次要结果是调查旁观者是否更有可能根据他们与受害者的关系提供心肺复苏术,比较“真正的”外行人心肺复苏术与家庭成员或朋友实施的心肺复苏术,以及这些比率在男性和女性之间有何差异。方法:本回顾性院前图表回顾包括2017年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间来自单一城市紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构的所有在EMS到达之前发生心脏骤停的病例(n = 701)。对于每次接触,记录BCPR是否存在,以及旁观者与患者的关系。“真正的”BCPR被定义为由患者不认识的外行人实施的CPR。如果患者表现出明显的死亡迹象,旁观者无法接触到,由训练有素的设施工作人员或警察进行心肺复苏术,EMS到达时存在不复苏(DNR)命令,接受心肺复苏术但未发生心脏骤停,或年龄小于18岁(n = 174),则排除患者。采用95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)评价资料,P < 0.05定义有统计学意义。结果:本研究共检查了701例心脏骤停病例,其中女性250例(35.7%),男性451例(64.3%)。总体而言,男性(n = 123;27.3%)比女性更有可能接受BCPR (n = 48;19.2%);Or = 1.58;95%置信区间,1.08 - -2.30;P = .02。在接受BCPR的人中,女性更有可能从她们认识的人那里得到它(83.3%对65.9%;Or = 2.59;95%置信区间,1.11 - -6.04;P = .03),而男性更有可能接受“真正的”外行人BCPR。结论:本研究确定了院前BCPR中显著的性别差异,并强调了旁观者与患者的关系与干预可能性之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信