Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Prediction Using a Multimodal Ultrasound-Based Hemispheric Modeling Strategy: A Prospective Dual-Center Study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jun Qiu, Tong-Juan Zou, Dong-Mei Wang, Hai-Rong Luo, Hai-Tao Yu, Ling Lei, Wan-Hong Yin
{"title":"Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Prediction Using a Multimodal Ultrasound-Based Hemispheric Modeling Strategy: A Prospective Dual-Center Study.","authors":"Jun Qiu, Tong-Juan Zou, Dong-Mei Wang, Hai-Rong Luo, Hai-Tao Yu, Ling Lei, Wan-Hong Yin","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02339-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate intracranial pressure (ICP) surveillance is a cornerstone of neurocritical care management, yet invasive monitoring still depends on neurosurgical expertise, specialized hardware, and continuous bedside resources-factors that restrict universal use even though insertion-related complications are relatively uncommon. Contemporary noninvasive ultrasound methods have limited predictive accuracy and seldom incorporate affected side information. We therefore preliminarily validated a multimodal, ultrasound-based hemispheric modeling approach that blends hemodynamic and structural indexes while emphasizing affected side specificity to enhance ICP prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, dual-center study, 41 neurosurgical patients provided 216 paired ultrasound and invasive ICP measurements. Affected side and contralateral ultrasound parameters including pulsatility index, resistance index, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), optic disk height, and ONSD-to-eyeball diameter ratio were analyzed. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) predicted continuous ICP, whereas generalized LMMs classified elevated ICP (≥ 20 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Affected side parameters showed consistently stronger ICP correlations than unaffected side parameters. An affected side five-parameter LMM (pulsatility index, resistance index, ONSD, ONSD-to-eyeball diameter ratio, and optic disk height) provided superior continuous ICP prediction (coefficient of determination [R<sup>2</sup>] = 0.618, root mean square error = 0.424), significantly outperforming contralateral models (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.338, root mean square error = 0.558). For binary classification, affected side ONSD demonstrated excellent accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.927, sensitivity = 91.4%, specificity = 79.5%), whereas the optimal affected side seven-parameter generalized LMM reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.829 (sensitivity = 80.8%, specificity = 75.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential advantages of a novel hemispheric (side-specific) modeling strategy for noninvasive ICP assessment. The multiparameter model constructed using affected side ultrasound parameters exhibited promising predictive accuracy, providing a potentially valuable and innovative noninvasive approach for ICP monitoring in neurocritical care patients that may serve as an adjunct when invasive monitoring is unavailable, although further validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02339-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate intracranial pressure (ICP) surveillance is a cornerstone of neurocritical care management, yet invasive monitoring still depends on neurosurgical expertise, specialized hardware, and continuous bedside resources-factors that restrict universal use even though insertion-related complications are relatively uncommon. Contemporary noninvasive ultrasound methods have limited predictive accuracy and seldom incorporate affected side information. We therefore preliminarily validated a multimodal, ultrasound-based hemispheric modeling approach that blends hemodynamic and structural indexes while emphasizing affected side specificity to enhance ICP prediction.

Methods: In this prospective, dual-center study, 41 neurosurgical patients provided 216 paired ultrasound and invasive ICP measurements. Affected side and contralateral ultrasound parameters including pulsatility index, resistance index, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), optic disk height, and ONSD-to-eyeball diameter ratio were analyzed. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) predicted continuous ICP, whereas generalized LMMs classified elevated ICP (≥ 20 mm Hg).

Results: Affected side parameters showed consistently stronger ICP correlations than unaffected side parameters. An affected side five-parameter LMM (pulsatility index, resistance index, ONSD, ONSD-to-eyeball diameter ratio, and optic disk height) provided superior continuous ICP prediction (coefficient of determination [R2] = 0.618, root mean square error = 0.424), significantly outperforming contralateral models (R2 = 0.338, root mean square error = 0.558). For binary classification, affected side ONSD demonstrated excellent accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.927, sensitivity = 91.4%, specificity = 79.5%), whereas the optimal affected side seven-parameter generalized LMM reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.829 (sensitivity = 80.8%, specificity = 75.8%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential advantages of a novel hemispheric (side-specific) modeling strategy for noninvasive ICP assessment. The multiparameter model constructed using affected side ultrasound parameters exhibited promising predictive accuracy, providing a potentially valuable and innovative noninvasive approach for ICP monitoring in neurocritical care patients that may serve as an adjunct when invasive monitoring is unavailable, although further validation is warranted.

使用基于多模态超声半球建模策略的无创颅内压预测:一项前瞻性双中心研究。
背景:准确的颅内压(ICP)监测是神经危重症护理管理的基石,然而侵入性监测仍然依赖于神经外科专业知识、专门的硬件和持续的床边资源——尽管插入相关并发症相对罕见,但这些因素限制了普遍应用。当代的无创超声方法预测准确性有限,很少纳入受累侧信息。因此,我们初步验证了一种多模式、基于超声的半球建模方法,该方法混合了血流动力学和结构指标,同时强调受影响侧的特异性,以增强ICP预测。方法:在这项前瞻性双中心研究中,41例神经外科患者提供了216对超声和有创ICP测量。分析患侧及对侧超声参数包括脉搏指数、阻力指数、视神经鞘直径(ONSD)、视盘高度、ONSD-眼球直径比。线性混合效应模型(lmm)预测持续ICP,而广义lmm模型将ICP升高(≥20 mm Hg)分类。结果:受影响侧参数与未受影响侧参数的ICP相关性始终较强。患侧五参数LMM(脉搏指数、阻力指数、ONSD、ONSD与眼球直径比、视盘高度)提供了优越的连续ICP预测(决定系数[R2] = 0.618,均方根误差= 0.424),显著优于对侧模型(R2 = 0.338,均方根误差= 0.558)。在二元分类中,患侧ONSD具有极好的准确率(受试者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.927,灵敏度= 91.4%,特异度= 79.5%),而最优的患侧七参数广义LMM在受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.829(灵敏度= 80.8%,特异度= 75.8%)。结论:本研究证明了一种新的半球(侧特异性)建模策略用于无创颅内压评估的可行性和潜在优势。使用受影响侧超声参数构建的多参数模型显示出有希望的预测准确性,为神经危重症患者的ICP监测提供了一种潜在的有价值和创新的非侵入性方法,可以作为侵入性监测不可用时的辅助手段,尽管需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信