Jingcheng Huang , Dejuan Shen , Jun Sun , Jie Shi , Weiqiang Dou , Martin Prince , Jing Ye , Xianfu Luo
{"title":"Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI distinguishes hepatocellular carcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Jingcheng Huang , Dejuan Shen , Jun Sun , Jie Shi , Weiqiang Dou , Martin Prince , Jing Ye , Xianfu Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the potential of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>76 Patients with histo-pathologically confirmed HCC or MF-ICC underwent dynamic contrast enhanced(DCE) MRI,APTw and DWI. Mean APTw and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver tumors were measured independently by two radiologists. Five-point scale were scored with DCE images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of APTw, ADC,DCE in differentiating HCC from MF-ICC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The HCC group (<em>n</em> = 53) exhibited higher APTw values compared to the MF-ICC group (<em>n</em> = 23)(1.37 ± 0.99 % vs. −0.31 ± 0.79 %, <em>P</em> < 0.001). The ADC values of HCC were lower than those of MF-ICC (0.87 ± 0.14 mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.20 mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <em>P</em> < 0.001). In differentiating HCC from MF-ICC, APTw demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than ADC (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.72; P < 0.001) and comparable efficacy to DCE-MRI (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.92; <em>P</em> > 0.05). The optimal APTw threshold for differentiating HCC from MF-ICC was 0.04 %, with a sensitivity of 92 % and a specificity of 78 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>APTw MRI demonstrated superior discrimination to DWI and comparable diagnostic efficacy to DCE-MRI in differentiating HCC from MF-ICC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 110491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25001754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the potential of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC).
Methods
76 Patients with histo-pathologically confirmed HCC or MF-ICC underwent dynamic contrast enhanced(DCE) MRI,APTw and DWI. Mean APTw and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver tumors were measured independently by two radiologists. Five-point scale were scored with DCE images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of APTw, ADC,DCE in differentiating HCC from MF-ICC.
Results
The HCC group (n = 53) exhibited higher APTw values compared to the MF-ICC group (n = 23)(1.37 ± 0.99 % vs. −0.31 ± 0.79 %, P < 0.001). The ADC values of HCC were lower than those of MF-ICC (0.87 ± 0.14 mm2/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.20 mm2/s, P < 0.001). In differentiating HCC from MF-ICC, APTw demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than ADC (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.72; P < 0.001) and comparable efficacy to DCE-MRI (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.92; P > 0.05). The optimal APTw threshold for differentiating HCC from MF-ICC was 0.04 %, with a sensitivity of 92 % and a specificity of 78 %.
Conclusion
APTw MRI demonstrated superior discrimination to DWI and comparable diagnostic efficacy to DCE-MRI in differentiating HCC from MF-ICC.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.