Pain management for medical abortion beyond 12 weeks of gestation: a cross-sectional study in Sweden.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Johanna Rydelius, Helena Kopp Kallner, Ove Karlsson, Helena Hognert, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
{"title":"Pain management for medical abortion beyond 12 weeks of gestation: a cross-sectional study in Sweden.","authors":"Johanna Rydelius, Helena Kopp Kallner, Ove Karlsson, Helena Hognert, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical abortion beyond 12 weeks' gestation increases experienced pain. The effectiveness of pain management protocols remains to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, conducted in six Swedish hospitals from 2019 to 2022, investigating home administration of the first misoprostol dose. Paracetamol 1000 mg and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) were provided with the first misoprostol dose and subsequent breakthrough pain medication as required. We recruited persons >18 years of age, with a viable singleton pregnancy between 12 weeks+1 day and 21 weeks+6 days of gestation. We collected data on patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) at fetal expulsion and maximum pain assessed retrospectively prior to discharge. We collected data on the use of breakthrough pain medication, satisfaction scores with pain relief, and VAS scores before/after administration of breakthrough analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 425 individuals. The participants reported a mean VAS of 39.1 (SD 34.4) at expulsion and 65.4 (SD 28.6) as maximum pain (assessed after abortion before discharge) and 352/425 (82.8%) received breakthrough pain medication, with 266/425 (62.6%) receiving an oral opioid, 163/425 (38.4%) a paracervical block (PCB) and 86/425 (20.2%) a parenteral opioid. A total of 357/392 (91.1%) participants were satisfied with the pain relief. Administration of a PCB alone or following an opioid resulted in the largest decrease in VAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many participants reported high VAS scores but most of them were satisfied with their analgesic treatment. A PCB was associated with the highest effectiveness in alleviating pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical abortion beyond 12 weeks' gestation increases experienced pain. The effectiveness of pain management protocols remains to be evaluated.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, conducted in six Swedish hospitals from 2019 to 2022, investigating home administration of the first misoprostol dose. Paracetamol 1000 mg and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) were provided with the first misoprostol dose and subsequent breakthrough pain medication as required. We recruited persons >18 years of age, with a viable singleton pregnancy between 12 weeks+1 day and 21 weeks+6 days of gestation. We collected data on patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) at fetal expulsion and maximum pain assessed retrospectively prior to discharge. We collected data on the use of breakthrough pain medication, satisfaction scores with pain relief, and VAS scores before/after administration of breakthrough analgesia.

Results: We included 425 individuals. The participants reported a mean VAS of 39.1 (SD 34.4) at expulsion and 65.4 (SD 28.6) as maximum pain (assessed after abortion before discharge) and 352/425 (82.8%) received breakthrough pain medication, with 266/425 (62.6%) receiving an oral opioid, 163/425 (38.4%) a paracervical block (PCB) and 86/425 (20.2%) a parenteral opioid. A total of 357/392 (91.1%) participants were satisfied with the pain relief. Administration of a PCB alone or following an opioid resulted in the largest decrease in VAS.

Conclusions: Many participants reported high VAS scores but most of them were satisfied with their analgesic treatment. A PCB was associated with the highest effectiveness in alleviating pain.

妊娠12周以上药物流产的疼痛管理:瑞典的一项横断面研究。
背景:妊娠12周以上药物流产会增加所经历的疼痛。疼痛管理方案的有效性仍有待评估。方法:这是对一项随机对照试验的二次分析,该试验于2019年至2022年在瑞典六家医院进行,调查了首剂米索前列醇的家庭给药情况。给予扑热息痛1000 mg和非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),第一剂米索前列醇,随后根据需要给予突破性止痛药。我们招募了年龄在bb0 - 18岁之间,怀孕12周+1天至21周+6天的单胎妊娠。我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS, 0-100 mm)收集胎儿排出时患者报告的疼痛数据,并在分娩前回顾性评估最大疼痛。我们收集了突破性止痛药的使用、疼痛缓解的满意度评分以及突破性镇痛前后的VAS评分。结果:我们纳入了425人。参与者报告的平均VAS在排出时为39.1 (SD 34.4),最大疼痛(流产后出院前评估)为65.4 (SD 28.6), 352/425(82.8%)接受突破性止痛药,266/425(62.6%)接受口服阿片类药物,163/425(38.4%)接受宫颈旁阻滞(PCB)和86/425(20.2%)接受肠外阿片类药物。392名参与者中有357人(91.1%)对疼痛缓解感到满意。单独或在阿片类药物后给药PCB导致VAS下降最大。结论:许多参与者的VAS评分较高,但大多数人对镇痛治疗感到满意。PCB与缓解疼痛的最高有效性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信