Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara
{"title":"Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25-49) and 62% (ages 50-64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25-49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50-64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points-a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25-49) and 82% (ages 50-64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.
Local problem: Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25-49) and 62% (ages 50-64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.
Methods: Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.
Results: This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25-49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50-64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points-a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25-49) and 82% (ages 50-64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.
Conclusions: This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.