Adductor tubercle as a reliable landmark for knee joint line determination: a comparative radiological study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yüksel Yüksel, Mehmet Sait Akar
{"title":"Adductor tubercle as a reliable landmark for knee joint line determination: a comparative radiological study","authors":"Yüksel Yüksel,&nbsp;Mehmet Sait Akar","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06031-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Accurate anatomical determination of the knee joint line is critically important for the success of both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of anatomical landmarks for determining the knee joint line using plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the Turkish population.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 186 patients. Anatomical reference points for the knee joint line were defined as the adductor tubercle, medial and lateral epicondyles, fibular head, tibial tuberosity, and inferior pole of the patella. Measurements obtained from all three imaging modalities were compared, and the relationships between femoral width (FW) and reference points were analyzed using correlation and linear regression analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant differences were found between the measurement results of the reference points across the imaging methods (lowest <i>r</i> = 0.91, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A strong correlation was observed between FW and the adductor tubercle joint line (ATJL) and medial epicondyle joint line (MEJL). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were greater than 0.90, indicating excellent reliability.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The adductor tubercle was identified as a reliable anatomical landmark for determining the knee joint line. Additionally, plain radiography, which offers advantages in terms of cost and reduced radiation exposure, may be a sufficient alternative for clinical applications. These findings can provide valuable contributions to surgical planning for accurate joint line determination. However, further studies are needed to validate these results in patients requiring surgical intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06031-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate anatomical determination of the knee joint line is critically important for the success of both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of anatomical landmarks for determining the knee joint line using plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the Turkish population.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 186 patients. Anatomical reference points for the knee joint line were defined as the adductor tubercle, medial and lateral epicondyles, fibular head, tibial tuberosity, and inferior pole of the patella. Measurements obtained from all three imaging modalities were compared, and the relationships between femoral width (FW) and reference points were analyzed using correlation and linear regression analyses.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between the measurement results of the reference points across the imaging methods (lowest r = 0.91, p < 0.001). A strong correlation was observed between FW and the adductor tubercle joint line (ATJL) and medial epicondyle joint line (MEJL). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were greater than 0.90, indicating excellent reliability.

Conclusions

The adductor tubercle was identified as a reliable anatomical landmark for determining the knee joint line. Additionally, plain radiography, which offers advantages in terms of cost and reduced radiation exposure, may be a sufficient alternative for clinical applications. These findings can provide valuable contributions to surgical planning for accurate joint line determination. However, further studies are needed to validate these results in patients requiring surgical intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内收肌结节作为膝关节线确定的可靠标志:一项比较放射学研究。
膝关节线的准确解剖测定对于初次和翻修全膝关节置换术的成功至关重要。本研究旨在评估土耳其人群中使用x线平片、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)确定膝关节线的解剖标志的可靠性。材料与方法:回顾性研究186例患者。膝关节线的解剖学参考点定义为内收肌结节、内外侧上髁、腓骨头、胫骨结节和髌骨下极。比较所有三种成像方式的测量结果,并使用相关和线性回归分析股骨宽度(FW)与参考点之间的关系。结果:不同成像方法测量参考点的结果无统计学差异(r最低= 0.91,p)。结论:内收肌结节是确定膝关节线的可靠解剖标志。此外,x线平片在成本和减少辐射暴露方面具有优势,可能是临床应用的充分选择。这些发现可以为手术计划提供有价值的贡献,以准确确定关节线。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果是否适用于需要手术干预的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信