Telemedicine follow-up for pre-malignant and malignant glottic lesions: a randomised controlled trial study protocol comparing care close to home versus standard of care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Nathalie F Van Rhee, Rosanne C Schoonbeek, Inge Wegner, Karin M Vermeulen, Robert C Maat, Dirk A Dietz de Loos, György B Halmos, Boudewijn E C Plaat
{"title":"Telemedicine follow-up for pre-malignant and malignant glottic lesions: a randomised controlled trial study protocol comparing care close to home versus standard of care.","authors":"Nathalie F Van Rhee, Rosanne C Schoonbeek, Inge Wegner, Karin M Vermeulen, Robert C Maat, Dirk A Dietz de Loos, György B Halmos, Boudewijn E C Plaat","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In the Netherlands, care for head and neck cancer (HNC) is centralised in head and neck oncology centres (HNOCs). Follow-up after treatment requires frequent visits that can burden patients and providers. Telemedicine, through remote evaluation of laryngopharyngoscopy videos recorded at local hospitals, may offer a feasible alternative. This study protocol describes the aim to assess patient satisfaction and safety with telemedicine follow-up after treatment of (pre-)malignant glottic lesions, including severe dysplasia, carcinoma-in-situ and T1 squamous cell carcinoma, conducted at one HNOC and participating general hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>As a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial, 90 patients with a one-way travel time by car of over 45 min to the HNOC will be allocated to the intervention group (follow-up by an Ear, Nose and Throat surgeon at a nearby participating hospital) or the control group (standard follow-up at the HNOC). All patients undergo guideline-based care. In the intervention group, laryngopharyngoscopy recordings will be remotely reviewed by HNOC specialists on the same day. Surveys will be fulfilled at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is overall patient satisfaction using a 0-10 numeric rating scale at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes are safety, quality of life, fear of recurrence, travel time and carbon-dioxide emission. Safety will be assessed through recurrence, complications, re-referral and survival. Between-group and within-group comparisons will be performed to evaluate differences in outcomes, using appropriate statistical methods based on data distribution.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study explores regional collaboration and sustainable follow-up for HNC patients. The ethics board approved the protocol (M23.325004). The authors commit to publishing the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1035-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: In the Netherlands, care for head and neck cancer (HNC) is centralised in head and neck oncology centres (HNOCs). Follow-up after treatment requires frequent visits that can burden patients and providers. Telemedicine, through remote evaluation of laryngopharyngoscopy videos recorded at local hospitals, may offer a feasible alternative. This study protocol describes the aim to assess patient satisfaction and safety with telemedicine follow-up after treatment of (pre-)malignant glottic lesions, including severe dysplasia, carcinoma-in-situ and T1 squamous cell carcinoma, conducted at one HNOC and participating general hospitals.

Methods and analysis: As a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial, 90 patients with a one-way travel time by car of over 45 min to the HNOC will be allocated to the intervention group (follow-up by an Ear, Nose and Throat surgeon at a nearby participating hospital) or the control group (standard follow-up at the HNOC). All patients undergo guideline-based care. In the intervention group, laryngopharyngoscopy recordings will be remotely reviewed by HNOC specialists on the same day. Surveys will be fulfilled at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is overall patient satisfaction using a 0-10 numeric rating scale at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes are safety, quality of life, fear of recurrence, travel time and carbon-dioxide emission. Safety will be assessed through recurrence, complications, re-referral and survival. Between-group and within-group comparisons will be performed to evaluate differences in outcomes, using appropriate statistical methods based on data distribution.

Ethics and dissemination: This study explores regional collaboration and sustainable follow-up for HNC patients. The ethics board approved the protocol (M23.325004). The authors commit to publishing the findings.

恶性前病变和恶性声门病变的远程医疗随访:一项随机对照试验研究方案,比较在家附近的护理与标准护理。
背景和目的:在荷兰,头颈癌(HNC)的治疗集中在头颈肿瘤中心(hnoc)。治疗后的随访需要频繁访问,这可能给患者和提供者带来负担。远程医疗,通过远程评估在当地医院录制的喉喉镜检查视频,可能提供一种可行的替代方案。本研究方案旨在评估患者对(前)恶性声门病变(包括严重发育不良、原位癌和T1鳞状细胞癌)治疗后远程医疗随访的满意度和安全性,该研究在一家HNOC和参与的综合医院进行。方法与分析:作为一项非盲、随机对照试验,90例单程乘车时间超过45分钟的患者将被分配到干预组(由附近参与医院的耳鼻喉外科医生随访)或对照组(在HNOC进行标准随访)。所有患者均接受基于指南的护理。在干预组,HNOC专家将在当天远程审查喉喉镜检查记录。调查将于基线、6个月及12个月完成。主要结果是在12个月的随访中使用0-10的数字评分量表进行总体患者满意度。次要结果是安全性、生活质量、对复发的恐惧、旅行时间和二氧化碳排放量。安全性将通过复发、并发症、再转诊和生存来评估。采用基于数据分布的适当统计方法,进行组间和组内比较,以评估结果的差异。伦理和传播:本研究探讨了HNC患者的区域合作和可持续随访。伦理委员会批准了该方案(M23.325004)。作者承诺将发表这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信