Evaluation of Objective Sedation Monitoring Practices in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001297
Natalia Jaworska, Areej Hezam, Thérèse Poulin, Julie A Kromm, Lisa D Burry, Daniel J Niven, Kirsten M Fiest
{"title":"Evaluation of Objective Sedation Monitoring Practices in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Natalia Jaworska, Areej Hezam, Thérèse Poulin, Julie A Kromm, Lisa D Burry, Daniel J Niven, Kirsten M Fiest","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if objective sedation monitoring practices reduce duration of mechanical ventilation and other clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes in critically ill adult patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PROSPERO, and the grey literature.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational or interventional original research studies, conducted in adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, evaluating any objective sedation monitoring practice (e.g., electroencephalography [EEG]), and reporting on duration of mechanical ventilation or other secondary outcomes (e.g., length of stay) were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Meta-analysis was performed for pooled estimates of the primary outcome and each individual secondary outcome using random-effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twenty studies (3410 patients) were included with 15 studies evaluating processed EEG monitoring, 2 evaluating EEG monitoring, and 3 evaluating processed facial electromyography (EMG). Processed EEG was not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.33; 95% CI, -0.91 to 0.25; I2 = 84.4%). Secondary outcomes of processed EEG monitoring showed decreased hospital length of stay (days) (SMD -0.89; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.62; I2 = 13.4%), reduced total sedative dose (reported in propofol equivalents, mg) (SMD -1.29; 95% CI, -2.27 to -0.31; I2 = 96.6%), and reduced total opioid dose (reported in morphine equivalents, mg) (SMD -0.40; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.04; I2 = 77.0%). Processed facial EMG was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (risk ratio 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90; I2 = 0.00%). Risk of bias was serious for 65% (n = 13/20) of included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Processed EEG monitoring is not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation but may be associated with reduced sedative and opioid exposure and decreased hospital length of stay. Processed facial EMG monitoring may be associated with increased adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 8","pages":"e1297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if objective sedation monitoring practices reduce duration of mechanical ventilation and other clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes in critically ill adult patients.

Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PROSPERO, and the grey literature.

Study selection: Observational or interventional original research studies, conducted in adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, evaluating any objective sedation monitoring practice (e.g., electroencephalography [EEG]), and reporting on duration of mechanical ventilation or other secondary outcomes (e.g., length of stay) were included.

Data extraction: Meta-analysis was performed for pooled estimates of the primary outcome and each individual secondary outcome using random-effects modeling.

Data synthesis: Twenty studies (3410 patients) were included with 15 studies evaluating processed EEG monitoring, 2 evaluating EEG monitoring, and 3 evaluating processed facial electromyography (EMG). Processed EEG was not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.33; 95% CI, -0.91 to 0.25; I2 = 84.4%). Secondary outcomes of processed EEG monitoring showed decreased hospital length of stay (days) (SMD -0.89; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.62; I2 = 13.4%), reduced total sedative dose (reported in propofol equivalents, mg) (SMD -1.29; 95% CI, -2.27 to -0.31; I2 = 96.6%), and reduced total opioid dose (reported in morphine equivalents, mg) (SMD -0.40; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.04; I2 = 77.0%). Processed facial EMG was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (risk ratio 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90; I2 = 0.00%). Risk of bias was serious for 65% (n = 13/20) of included studies.

Conclusions: Processed EEG monitoring is not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation but may be associated with reduced sedative and opioid exposure and decreased hospital length of stay. Processed facial EMG monitoring may be associated with increased adverse events.

危重成人患者客观镇静监测实践的评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定客观镇静监测措施是否可以减少危重成人患者机械通气时间和其他临床和医疗保健利用结果。数据来源:Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library和PROSPERO,以及灰色文献。研究选择:纳入对接受有创机械通气的成年危重患者进行的观察性或介入性原始研究,评估任何客观镇静监测实践(如脑电图[EEG]),并报告机械通气持续时间或其他次要结局(如住院时间)。数据提取:采用随机效应模型对主要结局和每个次要结局的汇总估计进行meta分析。资料综合:纳入20项研究(3410例患者),其中15项研究评价处理脑电图监测,2项研究评价处理脑电图监测,3项研究评价处理面肌电图。处理后的脑电图与机械通气持续时间的缩短无关(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.33;95% CI, -0.91 ~ 0.25;I2 = 84.4%)。处理脑电图监测的次要结果显示住院时间(天)缩短(SMD -0.89;95% CI, -1.17 ~ -0.62;I2 = 13.4%),总镇静剂量减少(报告异丙酚当量,mg) (SMD -1.29;95% CI, -2.27 ~ -0.31;I2 = 96.6%),阿片类药物总剂量(吗啡当量,mg)减少(SMD -0.40;95% CI, -0.76 ~ -0.04;I2 = 77.0%)。处理过的面部肌电图与不良事件风险增加相关(风险比1.40;95% ci, 1.03-1.90;I2 = 0.00%)。纳入的研究中有65% (n = 13/20)存在严重偏倚风险。结论:经过处理的脑电图监测与机械通气时间的缩短无关,但可能与镇静剂和阿片类药物暴露的减少以及住院时间的缩短有关。经过处理的面部肌电图监测可能与不良事件增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信