Real-world effectiveness of rope-ladder in situ cannulation in reducing pain and complications for hemodialysis patients with autogenous arteriovenous fistula.
Ming-Cong Cao, Wei Jiang, Ru-Fu Jia, Ke-Li Pan, Jingyi Sun
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of rope-ladder in situ cannulation in reducing pain and complications for hemodialysis patients with autogenous arteriovenous fistula.","authors":"Ming-Cong Cao, Wei Jiang, Ru-Fu Jia, Ke-Li Pan, Jingyi Sun","doi":"10.1177/11297298251364339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the rope-ladder in situ puncture technique in autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 AVF patients from the Hemodialysis Center of Cangzhou Central Hospital. The observation group (<i>n</i> = 40) received the Rope Ladder-in-Situ Cannulation Technique (RLiSCT), while the control group (<i>n</i> = 48) underwent conventional rope-ladder or area puncture. Outcomes included puncture pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), single-puncture success rate, aneurysm incidence, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 1 month, single-puncture success rates showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05). By 3 and 6 months, the observation group achieved 100% success, significantly higher than the control group (91.83% and 94.39%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated lower pain scores (4.36 ± 1.65 vs 6.23 ± 2.01, <i>p</i> < 0.05), reduced aneurysm incidence (2.50% vs 16.67%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and fewer total complications (7.50% vs 31.25%, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rope-ladder in situ puncture technique reduces pain, improves single-puncture success rates, and lowers aneurysm risk without increasing overall complications, supporting its clinical utility in hemodialysis AVF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251364339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251364339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the rope-ladder in situ puncture technique in autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for hemodialysis patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 AVF patients from the Hemodialysis Center of Cangzhou Central Hospital. The observation group (n = 40) received the Rope Ladder-in-Situ Cannulation Technique (RLiSCT), while the control group (n = 48) underwent conventional rope-ladder or area puncture. Outcomes included puncture pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), single-puncture success rate, aneurysm incidence, and complication rates.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). At 1 month, single-puncture success rates showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). By 3 and 6 months, the observation group achieved 100% success, significantly higher than the control group (91.83% and 94.39%, p < 0.05). At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated lower pain scores (4.36 ± 1.65 vs 6.23 ± 2.01, p < 0.05), reduced aneurysm incidence (2.50% vs 16.67%, p < 0.05), and fewer total complications (7.50% vs 31.25%, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The rope-ladder in situ puncture technique reduces pain, improves single-puncture success rates, and lowers aneurysm risk without increasing overall complications, supporting its clinical utility in hemodialysis AVF management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.