Biosensor-based approaches: Exploring hapten-protein interactions for the prediction of skin sensitisation.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1177/02611929251363484
Teh Ubaidah Noh, Nurul Izzah Khalid
{"title":"Biosensor-based approaches: Exploring hapten<i>-</i>protein interactions for the prediction of skin sensitisation.","authors":"Teh Ubaidah Noh, Nurul Izzah Khalid","doi":"10.1177/02611929251363484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assays to predict the skin sensitisation potential of substances commonly address the molecular initiating event (MIE) of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP), which is the covalent binding of chemicals to proteins. This represents the first key event in the pathway. <i>In chemico</i> approaches have emerged as validated alternatives to conventional animal testing methods to determine this process. This review explores the integration of biosensor-based approaches to supplement other <i>in chemico</i> methods, for use as alternatives to the 'gold standard' Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) in skin sensitisation testing. While surface plasmon resonance-based biosensors have shown promise, they exhibit limitations such as poor sensitivity. To overcome such limitations, this review highlights the use of impedance-based biosensors in the study of hapten-skin protein interactions, which are associated with the MIE in skin sensitisation. Impedance-based biosensors have exhibited impressive performance, with a specificity of 97%, a sensitivity of 83% and an accuracy of 92% being obtained in one study (<i>N</i> = 49 substances). The advantages of impedance-based biosensors include label-free methodologies, high sensitivity, low cost and operational simplicity. This review also covers recent advancements in the use of biosensors in cosmetic studies and skin research, as well as comparisons of the limitations of the various <i>in chemico</i> methods and future perspectives for skin sensitisation assessment. The use of impedance-based biosensors as part of integrated testing approaches alongside other <i>in chemico</i> testing methods, can represent a reliable approach for skin sensitisation assessment, while supporting the reduction and replacement of animal use in toxicity testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"281-300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929251363484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assays to predict the skin sensitisation potential of substances commonly address the molecular initiating event (MIE) of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP), which is the covalent binding of chemicals to proteins. This represents the first key event in the pathway. In chemico approaches have emerged as validated alternatives to conventional animal testing methods to determine this process. This review explores the integration of biosensor-based approaches to supplement other in chemico methods, for use as alternatives to the 'gold standard' Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) in skin sensitisation testing. While surface plasmon resonance-based biosensors have shown promise, they exhibit limitations such as poor sensitivity. To overcome such limitations, this review highlights the use of impedance-based biosensors in the study of hapten-skin protein interactions, which are associated with the MIE in skin sensitisation. Impedance-based biosensors have exhibited impressive performance, with a specificity of 97%, a sensitivity of 83% and an accuracy of 92% being obtained in one study (N = 49 substances). The advantages of impedance-based biosensors include label-free methodologies, high sensitivity, low cost and operational simplicity. This review also covers recent advancements in the use of biosensors in cosmetic studies and skin research, as well as comparisons of the limitations of the various in chemico methods and future perspectives for skin sensitisation assessment. The use of impedance-based biosensors as part of integrated testing approaches alongside other in chemico testing methods, can represent a reliable approach for skin sensitisation assessment, while supporting the reduction and replacement of animal use in toxicity testing.

基于生物传感器的方法:探索半抗原蛋白相互作用预测皮肤致敏。
预测物质皮肤致敏潜力的试验通常涉及不良结果途径(AOP)的分子起始事件(MIE),这是化学物质与蛋白质的共价结合。这代表了通路中的第一个关键事件。化学方法已成为传统动物试验方法的有效替代方法,以确定这一过程。这篇综述探讨了基于生物传感器的方法的整合,以补充其他化学方法,作为皮肤致敏测试中“金标准”局部淋巴结测定(LLNA)的替代方法。虽然基于表面等离子共振的生物传感器显示出了希望,但它们表现出灵敏度差等局限性。为了克服这些限制,本综述强调了在半抗原-皮肤蛋白相互作用研究中使用基于阻抗的生物传感器,这与皮肤致敏中的MIE有关。基于阻抗的生物传感器表现出了令人印象深刻的性能,在一项研究(N = 49种物质)中获得了97%的特异性,83%的灵敏度和92%的准确性。基于阻抗的生物传感器的优点包括无标签方法、高灵敏度、低成本和操作简单。这篇综述还涵盖了生物传感器在化妆品研究和皮肤研究中的最新进展,以及各种化学方法的局限性的比较和皮肤致敏评估的未来前景。使用基于阻抗的生物传感器作为综合测试方法的一部分,与其他化学测试方法一起,可以代表一种可靠的皮肤致敏评估方法,同时支持减少和替代毒性测试中的动物使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信