Incidence, outcome, and risk factors of contrast media extravasation injury during contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans: an observational cohort study.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-2332
Lijian Wang, Qinlan Chen, Haipeng Liu, Xiaomi Wang, Qian Qian, Mengxi Xu, Linlin Ma, Xinhong Wang
{"title":"Incidence, outcome, and risk factors of contrast media extravasation injury during contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans: an observational cohort study.","authors":"Lijian Wang, Qinlan Chen, Haipeng Liu, Xiaomi Wang, Qian Qian, Mengxi Xu, Linlin Ma, Xinhong Wang","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-2332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast media (CM) is widely used in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to enhance the visualization of abnormal structures. CM extravasation, a recognized complication, may cause mild swelling or severe injuries (e.g., ulceration, necrosis). Current research on severe extravasation is limited to case reports or lacks large-cohort analyses of risk factors. This study aimed to explore risk factors, validate incidence and outcomes, and compare patient/technique/CM-related factors between mild and severe CM extravasation injuries using large-scale clinical data to aid early recognition and prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 586,812 CM injections were performed during CECT scans at a single institution between November 2012 and December 2023. Among these, 709 cases (334 males, 375 females; age: 62.9±15.2 years) with CM extravasation injuries were included. Extravasation injuries were classified by severity. The frequency and clinical outcomes of different severities of injuries were investigated. Risk factors of serious injuries were evaluated using logistic regression with generalized estimating equation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CM extravasation occurred in 0.12% (709/586,812) of cases. Of the 709 extravasation injuries, 672 (94.8%) were mild, 32 (4.5%) were moderate, and 5 (0.7%) were severe. Only 5 patients received consultations from dermatologists or burn specialists, and none required surgery. Multivariate analysis underscored the presence of diabetes mellitus [DM, odds ratio (OR) =8.04; P<0.01], injections in the dorsum of the hand (OR =4.86; P<0.01), without saline test (OR =2.58; P=0.02), and large-volume extravasation (OR =5.49; P<0.01) as potential risk factors of moderate or severe CM extravasation injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most CM extravasation injuries are mild and without serious consequences. Multiple modifiable risk factors for serious CM extravasation injury have been identified that could mitigate the severity of the injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 8","pages":"7338-7351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-2332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contrast media (CM) is widely used in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to enhance the visualization of abnormal structures. CM extravasation, a recognized complication, may cause mild swelling or severe injuries (e.g., ulceration, necrosis). Current research on severe extravasation is limited to case reports or lacks large-cohort analyses of risk factors. This study aimed to explore risk factors, validate incidence and outcomes, and compare patient/technique/CM-related factors between mild and severe CM extravasation injuries using large-scale clinical data to aid early recognition and prevention.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 586,812 CM injections were performed during CECT scans at a single institution between November 2012 and December 2023. Among these, 709 cases (334 males, 375 females; age: 62.9±15.2 years) with CM extravasation injuries were included. Extravasation injuries were classified by severity. The frequency and clinical outcomes of different severities of injuries were investigated. Risk factors of serious injuries were evaluated using logistic regression with generalized estimating equation analyses.

Results: CM extravasation occurred in 0.12% (709/586,812) of cases. Of the 709 extravasation injuries, 672 (94.8%) were mild, 32 (4.5%) were moderate, and 5 (0.7%) were severe. Only 5 patients received consultations from dermatologists or burn specialists, and none required surgery. Multivariate analysis underscored the presence of diabetes mellitus [DM, odds ratio (OR) =8.04; P<0.01], injections in the dorsum of the hand (OR =4.86; P<0.01), without saline test (OR =2.58; P=0.02), and large-volume extravasation (OR =5.49; P<0.01) as potential risk factors of moderate or severe CM extravasation injury.

Conclusions: Most CM extravasation injuries are mild and without serious consequences. Multiple modifiable risk factors for serious CM extravasation injury have been identified that could mitigate the severity of the injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对比增强计算机断层扫描期间造影剂外渗损伤的发生率、结果和危险因素:一项观察性队列研究。
背景:造影剂(CM)被广泛应用于对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT),以增强异常结构的可视化。CM外渗是一种公认的并发症,可引起轻度肿胀或严重损伤(如溃疡、坏死)。目前对严重外渗的研究仅限于病例报告或缺乏对危险因素的大队列分析。本研究旨在通过大规模临床数据探讨轻度和重度CM外渗损伤的危险因素,验证发病率和结局,并比较患者/技术/CM相关因素,以帮助早期识别和预防。方法:回顾性队列研究。在2012年11月至2023年12月期间,同一家机构在CECT扫描期间共进行了586812次CM注射。其中,709例,男334例,女375例;年龄:62.9±15.2岁),CM外渗损伤。外渗损伤按严重程度分类。研究不同程度损伤的发生频率和临床结果。采用logistic回归和广义估计方程分析对严重损伤的危险因素进行评价。结果:CM外渗占0.12%(709/586,812)。709例外渗伤中,轻度672例(94.8%),中度32例(4.5%),重度5例(0.7%)。只有5名患者接受了皮肤科医生或烧伤专家的咨询,没有人需要手术。多因素分析强调糖尿病的存在[DM],优势比(OR) =8.04;结论:CM外渗损伤多为轻度,无严重后果。已经确定了严重CM外渗损伤的多个可改变的危险因素,可以减轻损伤的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信