Organisational Interventions for Compassionate Care: The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Lydia Tunstall, Philip Molyneux, Tim Alexander
{"title":"Organisational Interventions for Compassionate Care: The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.","authors":"Lydia Tunstall, Philip Molyneux, Tim Alexander","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish 'what works' and inform future interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods and data sources: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete 'findings/results' sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish 'what works' and inform future interventions.

Aims: To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.

Design: Qualitative evidence synthesis.

Methods and data sources: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete 'findings/results' sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.

Conclusion: Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.

Implications: The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.

Reporting method: PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.

体恤关怀的组织干预:医疗保健专业人员的观点。定性证据综合。
背景:为了应对全球医疗保健不良的呼声,组织干预措施已经实施,目的是促进富有同情心的护理。全面综合定性数据,包括参与干预的卫生保健工作人员的观点,可以确定“什么有效”,并为未来的干预提供信息。目的:综合现有的研究,探索医护人员如何体验体恤护理的组织干预。设计:定性证据合成。方法与数据来源:于2023年8月进行定性证据综合。检索了五个数据库:MEDLINE、Academic Search Premier、CINAHL、APA PsycInfo和APA PsycArticles。文章符合以下标准:(a)报告了参与有组织的同情护理干预措施的卫生保健工作人员的经验,(b)发生在卫生保健环境中,(c)使用定性或混合方法方法,(d)以英文出版,(e)自2010年以来出版。使用NVivo软件进行主题合成以合成研究结果。来自完整的“发现/结果”部分的数据包括在综合中。最终的搜索协议和搜索策略已在PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404)上注册,并使用PRISMA指南进行报告。结果:本综述纳入了18项定性或混合方法研究,概括了8个国家卫生保健人员的经验。确定了四个主题:(1)抑制,(2)人性化医疗,(3)灌输价值观,(4)可持续性很重要。结论:富有同情心的卫生保健的组织干预受到卫生保健人员的重视和赞赏,并促进了反思和联系。干预措施促进临床创造力,改善员工福利,加强员工之间的沟通。含义:应鼓励在医疗保健机构实施体恤护理的组织干预措施。考虑组织文化的干预措施是由组织价值观驱动的,并考虑到可持续性,可以改善员工的福祉,并对患者护理的提供产生积极影响。报告方法:本综述的报告遵循PRISMA指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信