Allogeneic fibroblasts vs conventional debridement after successful endovascular interventions for treating chronic ulcers induced by peripheral artery disease.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17959
Azat Chinaliyev, Azat Chinaliyev, Bazylbek Zhakiyev, Didar Khassenov, Gulnara Sakhipova, Natalya Zagorulya, Gaukhar Kuanyshbayeva, Nurlan Zhampeissov, Damir Biktashev, Murat Jakanov, Ainur Donayeva, Ibrahim A Abdelazim
{"title":"Allogeneic fibroblasts vs conventional debridement after successful endovascular interventions for treating chronic ulcers induced by peripheral artery disease.","authors":"Azat Chinaliyev, Azat Chinaliyev, Bazylbek Zhakiyev, Didar Khassenov, Gulnara Sakhipova, Natalya Zagorulya, Gaukhar Kuanyshbayeva, Nurlan Zhampeissov, Damir Biktashev, Murat Jakanov, Ainur Donayeva, Ibrahim A Abdelazim","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fibroblasts are stromal and connective tissue cells that play crucial roles in the intracellular matrix and granulation tissue synthesis during tissue proliferation. They are also responsible for epithelialization and healing of skin lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to compare the use of allogeneic fibroblasts with conventional debridement after successful endovascular interventions (EVIs) for the treatment of chronic ulcers induced by peripheral artery disease (PAD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 116 participants with chronic ulcers due to PAD were randomly assigned, after successful EVI, to receive either allogeneic fibroblasts (study group; n = 58) or conventional debridement (control group; n = 58) for treatment of the ulcers. The participant data were collected over 1 year of follow-up to compare the effectiveness of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) duration of initial and complete healing of chronic ulcers after successful EVI was shorter in the allogeneic fibroblast group (2.59 [0.53] and 5.04 [0.58] months, respectively) than in the controls (3.56 [0.44] and 5.8 [0.35] months, respectively; <i>P</i> <⁠0.001 for all). A correlation analysis showed a moderately significant correlation between the healing of chronic ulcers (both initial and complete) after successful EVI and the use of allogeneic fibroblasts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Allogeneic fibroblasts are an effective and noninvasive option for the treatment of chronic PAD-induced ulcers after successful EVI. The duration of initial and complete healing was significantly shorter in the allogeneic fibroblast group than in the conventional debridement group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 2","pages":"226-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fibroblasts are stromal and connective tissue cells that play crucial roles in the intracellular matrix and granulation tissue synthesis during tissue proliferation. They are also responsible for epithelialization and healing of skin lesions.

Aim: Our aim was to compare the use of allogeneic fibroblasts with conventional debridement after successful endovascular interventions (EVIs) for the treatment of chronic ulcers induced by peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Materials and methods: A total of 116 participants with chronic ulcers due to PAD were randomly assigned, after successful EVI, to receive either allogeneic fibroblasts (study group; n = 58) or conventional debridement (control group; n = 58) for treatment of the ulcers. The participant data were collected over 1 year of follow-up to compare the effectiveness of both methods.

Results: The mean (SD) duration of initial and complete healing of chronic ulcers after successful EVI was shorter in the allogeneic fibroblast group (2.59 [0.53] and 5.04 [0.58] months, respectively) than in the controls (3.56 [0.44] and 5.8 [0.35] months, respectively; P <⁠0.001 for all). A correlation analysis showed a moderately significant correlation between the healing of chronic ulcers (both initial and complete) after successful EVI and the use of allogeneic fibroblasts.

Conclusions: Allogeneic fibroblasts are an effective and noninvasive option for the treatment of chronic PAD-induced ulcers after successful EVI. The duration of initial and complete healing was significantly shorter in the allogeneic fibroblast group than in the conventional debridement group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

同种异体成纤维细胞与血管内介入治疗外周动脉疾病引起的慢性溃疡后的传统清创比较
成纤维细胞是间质细胞和结缔组织细胞,在组织增殖过程中对细胞内基质和肉芽组织的合成起着至关重要的作用。它们也负责皮肤损伤的上皮化和愈合。目的:我们的目的是比较同种异体成纤维细胞与血管内干预(EVIs)成功治疗外周动脉疾病(PAD)引起的慢性溃疡后的常规清创的应用。材料和方法:共有116名因PAD引起的慢性溃疡患者被随机分配,在EVI成功后接受同种异体成纤维细胞(研究组;N = 58)或常规清创(对照组;N = 58)用于治疗溃疡。参与者的数据收集超过1年的随访比较两种方法的有效性。结果:同种异体成纤维细胞组成功EVI后慢性溃疡初始愈合和完全愈合的平均(SD)时间(分别为2.59[0.53]和5.04[0.58]个月)短于对照组(分别为3.56[0.44]和5.8[0.35]个月;结论:同种异体成纤维细胞是治疗EVI成功后慢性pad诱导溃疡的有效且无创的选择。同种异体成纤维细胞组的初始愈合和完全愈合时间明显短于常规清创组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信