Investigation of metric properties of the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Serife Demirbas, İlknur Naz, Melissa Köprülüoğlu Koç, Elvan Felekoglu, Ceyda Anar
{"title":"Investigation of metric properties of the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.","authors":"Serife Demirbas, İlknur Naz, Melissa Köprülüoğlu Koç, Elvan Felekoglu, Ceyda Anar","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2544192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often experience a decline in activities of daily living (ADL) due to progressive lung impairment. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate ADL performance in a way that reflects real-life challenges.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the metric properties of the Londrina ADL Protocol in patients with IPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three patients (66.7% men, age: 66.7 ± 5.2 years) participated in this observational metric analysis study. We evaluated the protocol's validity, reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC<sub>95</sub>). To assess validity, we calculated correlation coefficients between the Londrina-ADL protocol and the Glittre Test (TGlittre), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the London Chest-ADL (LCADL) Scale, hand grip strength, knee extension strength, and respiratory functions. Intra-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), paired sample t-test, SEM, MDC<sub>95</sub>, and the learning effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Londrina-ADL protocol showed significant correlations with the TGlittre, the 6MWT, the LCADL, hand grip strength, knee extension strength, and respiratory functions (<i>r</i> = 0.742, <i>r</i> = -0.619, <i>r</i> = 0.665, <i>r</i> = -0.601, <i>r</i> = -0.587, <i>p</i> < .001, respectively.). The protocol demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.939). Test durations differed significantly between tests (<i>p</i> < .001). The SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> values were 8.69 seconds and 24.01 seconds, respectively, with a learning effect of 4.7% observed between the first and second tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its strong metric properties, the Londrina-ADL protocol may serve as a practical and sensitive tool for evaluating daily functional capacity and guiding individualized rehabilitation strategies in patients with IPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2544192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often experience a decline in activities of daily living (ADL) due to progressive lung impairment. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate ADL performance in a way that reflects real-life challenges.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the metric properties of the Londrina ADL Protocol in patients with IPF.

Methods: Thirty-three patients (66.7% men, age: 66.7 ± 5.2 years) participated in this observational metric analysis study. We evaluated the protocol's validity, reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95). To assess validity, we calculated correlation coefficients between the Londrina-ADL protocol and the Glittre Test (TGlittre), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the London Chest-ADL (LCADL) Scale, hand grip strength, knee extension strength, and respiratory functions. Intra-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), paired sample t-test, SEM, MDC95, and the learning effect.

Results: The Londrina-ADL protocol showed significant correlations with the TGlittre, the 6MWT, the LCADL, hand grip strength, knee extension strength, and respiratory functions (r = 0.742, r = -0.619, r = 0.665, r = -0.601, r = -0.587, p < .001, respectively.). The protocol demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.939). Test durations differed significantly between tests (p < .001). The SEM and MDC95 values were 8.69 seconds and 24.01 seconds, respectively, with a learning effect of 4.7% observed between the first and second tests.

Conclusion: Given its strong metric properties, the Londrina-ADL protocol may serve as a practical and sensitive tool for evaluating daily functional capacity and guiding individualized rehabilitation strategies in patients with IPF.

特发性肺纤维化患者Londrina日常生活活动方案的度量特性研究。
背景:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者通常由于进行性肺损伤而导致日常生活活动(ADL)下降。因此,必须以反映现实挑战的方式评估ADL的性能。目的:本研究旨在探讨Londrina ADL方案在IPF患者中的度量特性。方法:33例患者(男性66.7%,年龄:66.7±5.2岁)参与观察性计量分析研究。我们评估了方案的有效性、可靠性、测量标准误差(SEM)和95%置信度的最小可检测变化(MDC95)。为了评估有效性,我们计算了Londrina-ADL方案与Glittre测试(TGlittre)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、London Chest-ADL (LCADL)量表、手部握力、膝关节伸展力和呼吸功能之间的相关系数。采用类内相关系数(ICC)、配对样本t检验、扫描电镜(SEM)、MDC95和学习效应分析了组内信度。结果:Londrina-ADL方案与TGlittre、6MWT、LCADL、手掌握力、膝关节伸展力、呼吸功能有显著相关性(r = 0.742, r = -0.619, r = 0.665, r = -0.601, r = -0.587, p < 0.001)。该方案具有良好的内部可靠性(ICC = 0.939)。测试持续时间在测试之间差异显著(p 95值分别为8.69秒和24.01秒),在第一次和第二次测试之间观察到4.7%的学习效果。结论:鉴于其强大的度量特性,Londrina-ADL方案可作为评估IPF患者日常功能能力和指导个性化康复策略的实用且敏感的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信